1887
Volume 42, Issue 10
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology is recognised as an important contribution to mitigate climate changes, and monitoring of the injected carbon dioxide (CO is an important element of this technology to ensure that the CCS system operates within the required legal and regulatory standards. To be able to offer more flexible monitoring solutions, the potential of mini streamers for overburden and shallow CCS monitoring has been investigated. The results from a series of 2D and 3D mini-streamer operations across the Sleipner CO storage site are assessed and compared with conventional streamer seismic. The results show a clear enhancement in overburden imaging and higher detail at the CO plume level compared to conventional streamer seismic data. However, the mini streamers also come with limitations related to the acquisition configuration (for example limited fold, offset, etc.).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024085
2024-10-01
2024-10-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berndt, C., Planke, S., Mienert, J., Bunz, S. and Eriksen, F. [2006]. The Plumbing System of the Håkon Mosby Mud Volcano – New Insights from High-Resolution 3D seismic data.AAPG/GSTT Hedberg Conference, Mobile Shale Basins – Genesis, Evolution and Hydrocarbon Systems (Abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fayemendy, C., Erlandsen, E.P. and Sadikhov, E. [2020]. First Use of a Triple Seismic Source for PRM acquisitions on the Johan Sverdrup Field.Second EAGE Marine Acquisition workshop (Abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Furre, A.K., Eiken, O., Alnes, H., Vevatne, J.N. and Kiær, A.F., 20 years of monitoring CO2-injection at Sleipner, 2017. 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Furre, A.K. and Eiken, O. [2014]. Dual sensor streamer technology used in Sleipner CO2 injection monitoring, Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 1075–1088.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatchell, P., Bakku, S. and Yang, Z. [2019]. 4D seismic of deep reservoirs with a low-cost P-cable system.81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition (Abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hibben, T. and Burnett, M.J. [2015]. The development of a dual containerized source system.Third EAGE workshop on permanent reservoir monitoring (Abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nicoll, G.D. [2011]. Evaluation of the Nordland Group overburden as an effective seal for the Sleipner CO2 storage site (offshore Norway) using analytical and stochastic modelling techniques.PhD thesis University of Edinburgh, https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/7813.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Planke, S., Eriksen, O.K., Mienert, J., Bünz, S., Berndt, C., Lie, E. and Eriksen, F.N. [2010]. P-cable High Resolution Seismic Imaging of Shallow Gas in the Barents Sea.72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ryan, C., Liao, K., Moore, H., Westerdahl, H., Thompson, M., Pedersen, Å.S., Mispel, J., Wierzchowska, M., Dehghan-Niri, R. and Biryaltseva, Y. [2024]. Short streamer acquisition- the potential and the challenges. EAGE GeoTech 2024, 4th EAGE workshop on Practical Reservoir Monitoring.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024085
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024085
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error