A Proposed Standard Seismic Frequency Nomenclature for Geophysical Site Investigation Surveys in the Offshore Energy Sector

Andy W. Hill; Gary Nicol; Mick R. Cook

doi:10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024092

ISSN: 0263-5046
E-ISSN: 1365-2397

A Proposed Standard Seismic Frequency Nomenclature for Geophysical Site Investigation Surveys in the Offshore Energy Sector
Authors Andy W. Hill¹, Gary Nicol² and Mick R. Cook³
View Affiliations Hide Affiliations

Affiliations: ¹ bp ² Engenius/Change Beetle Software ³ MCL Consultancy
Source: First Break, Volume 42, Issue 11, Nov 2024, p. 37 - 41
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024092
- Published online: 01 Nov 2024

Abstract

This paper sets out to provide a suggested standardised set of nomenclature for seismic interpretation data of different frequency (Hz) spectra in use in the offshore energy sector. Historically, a large number of acronyms have been used to describe seismic interpretation data of different frequency content across the oil and gas industry and now in the rapidly growing offshore wind and carbon storage sectors, but the terms in use have not always been consistent or logical.

This paper sets out to understand the history and background behind the evolution of these terms and to remove the confusion from current usage of MR, HR, UHR, UUHR, VHR, or SUHR by definition of a standardised nomenclature for seismic interpretation data ranging from 4Hz up to 5000Hz in frequency content. It is believed application of such a standard throughout the global offshore energy industry will ensure consistency and a common understanding going forward.

EAGE Publications BV

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024092

2024-11-01

2024-12-06

From This Site

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024092

dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword

-contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution

10

5

Full text loading...

References

Arthur, J., Cauquil, E., Hill, A. and Wardell, N. [2017]. Forward: Special Issue on Applied Marine Geophysics.Near Surface Geophysics, 15, 333–334.
[Google Scholar]
Cooper, C. [2023]. 3DHR Seismic Acquisition for CCS and considerations for Windfarm UHR.Seismic 2023: The Evolving Role of Seismic in the Energy Landscape, SPE, Aberdeen, April 2023.
[Google Scholar]
IOGP [2017]. Guidelines for the conduct of offshore drilling hazard site surveys.International Oil and Gas Producers Association, London, Version 2, Revised October 2017.
[Google Scholar]
ISO [2021]. Petroleum and natural gas industries - Specific requirements for offshore structures - Part 10: Marine geophysical investigations.International Organization for Standardization, ISO 19901-10:2021(E), 2021.
[Google Scholar]
Lucas, A.L. [1974]. A High Resolution Marine seismic survey.Geophysical Prospecting, 22, 667–682.
[Google Scholar]
Moore, N.A. [1973]. Multi-Pak: a New Geophysical Method for Marine Engineers.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 29 April–2 May 1973. OTC 1798.
[Google Scholar]
Putri, S.A., Birt, C.S., Galanes-Alvarez, H., Apriani, R., Eloni, R., Manning, T. and Higson, M. [2017]. Tangguh Geotechnics and Geohazards Mitigation Part.1: The big picture. EAGE-HAGI 1st Asia Pacific meeting on Near Surface Geoscience & Engineering, extended abstract.
[Google Scholar]
SUT [2022]. Guidance Notes for the Planning and Execution of Geophysical and Geotechnical Ground Investigations for Offshore Renewable Energy Developments. ISBN 0 906940 59 1, Society of Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics Committee, M.R. Cook Ed. London. Revised September 2022.
[Google Scholar]
UKOOA [1992]. Guidelines for the Conduct of Mobile Drilling Rig Site Surveys, Volumes 1 and 2. United Kingdom Offshore Operators Association (UKOOA).
[Google Scholar]
USCG [1965]. Marine Board of Investigation; explosion, fire and sinking of the Drilling Barge C.P. Baker in the Gulf of Mexico, 30 June 1964. United States Coast Guard, 5943/C.P. Baker, 23 April 1965.
[Google Scholar]
Widmaier, M. [2023]. PGS Live, Wind. PGS online webinar, 1 July 2023.
[Google Scholar]

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024092

A Proposed Standard Seismic Frequency Nomenclature for Geophysical Site Investigation Surveys in the Offshore Energy Sector

First Break 42, 37 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024092

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024092

Data & Media loading...

Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

- Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons
  
  By A. Roberts
- Distributed Acoustic Sensing – a new tool for seismic applications
  
  Authors Tom Parker, Sergey Shatalin and Mahmoud Farhadiroushan
- Effects of igneous intrusions on the petroleum system: a review
  
  Authors Kim Senger, John Millett, Sverre Planke, Kei Ogata, Christian Haug Eide, Marte Festøy, Olivier Galland and Dougal A. Jerram
- Seismic Inversion Methods and some of their constraints
  
  Authors P.C.H. Veeken and M. Da Silva
- MEMS-based accelerometers: expectations and practical achievements
  
  Authors D. Mougenot, A. Cherepovskiy and L. JunJie
- Thematic Set: Full waveform inversion: the next leap forward in imaging at Valhall
  
  Authors L. Sirgue, O.I. Barkved, J. Dellinger, J. Etgen, U. Albertin and J.H. Kommedal
- Automatic seismic prediction ahead of the tunnel boring machine
  
  Authors G. Kneib, A. Kassel and K. Lorenz
- Well log and seismic data analysis using rock physics templates
  
  Authors P. A. Avseth and E. Odegaard
- Geostatistical inversion - a sequential method of stochastic reservoir modelling constrained by seismic data
  
  Authors A. Haas and O. Dubrule
- Two-dimensional resistivity mapping with a computer-controlled array
  
  Authors D.H. Griffiths, J. Turnbull and A.I. Olayinka
More Less

A Proposed Standard Seismic Frequency Nomenclature for Geophysical Site Investigation Surveys in the Offshore Energy Sector

Abstract

Most Read This Month

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed