1887
Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Unidentified structural features, primarily faults, are estimated to cost the coal mining industry in Australia alone $6 billion per year. Although seismic surveys are routinely used to characterise structures ahead of mining, these are often limited to 2D lines, with only the most recent being high-resolution 3D surveys. The most common approach for providing detailed structural definition is to drill a series of holes. In this paper we show a comparison between a full high-resolution 3D survey and a much smaller mini-survey over an area of particular structural complexity. The extracted surfaces, corresponding to three different coal seams, and the resulting structural interpretations, were consistent. Based on these results we are confident this approach can be used as an alternative to drilling to quickly and easily identify possible structural issues in high-priority areas. The method could also be used to accurately measure the strike of faults identified from 2D surveys.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2025004
2025-01-01
2025-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bachrach, R. and Freeman, E. [2002]. Using small-scale 2D and 3D pilot surveys to evaluate the seismic response and image unsaturated sedimentary units at depths of 80 m and 20 m at the Hanford site. SEG Technical Program 2002, Expanded Abstracts, 1504–1507.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bagaini, C., Dean, T., Quigley, J. and Tite, G.-A. [2008]. Systems and methods for enhancing low-frequency content in Vibroseis acquisition. Patent WO-2007068891-A9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Charles, S., Lin, J., Kuzmiski, R., Leung, P., Mouaki, A., Looi, S. Y. and Liu, Q. [2019]. A high-density, high-resolution joint 3D VSP–3D surface seismic case study in the Canadian oil sands. The Leading Edge, 38(1), 35–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Colombo, D., Sandoval-Curiel, E., Alyousuf, T., Turkoglu, E. and Rovetta, D. [2024]. Ultra-dense nodal seismic acquisition for automated geohazard analysis. The Leading Edge, 43(8), 484–493.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dean, T. [2023a]. The application of graph theory to optimise the design of onshore 2D seismic surveys. The Leading Edge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dean, T. [2023b]. Quantitative measurement of the environmental disturbance caused by onshore seismic surveys. Exploration Geophysics, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dean, T. [2024]. A comparison of two land nodal seismic recording systems. Exploration Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dean, T. [2024]. An Integrated Approach to Vibroseis Sweep Design. First Break, 42(1), 59–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dean, T., Grant, M. and Pavlova, M. [2021]. The Efficient Acquisition of High-Resolution 3D Seismic Surveys for Shallow Open-Cut Mining. First Break, 39(8), 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dean, T., Grant, M. and Pavolva, M. [2021]. A brief history of 3D seismic acquisition in BHP Coal and some predictions for the future. Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dean, T., Pavlova, M., Grant, M., Bayly, M., Sweeney, D., Re, S. and Strobbia, C. [2021]. Imaging the near surface using velocity inversions of ultra-high-density 3D seismic data. The Leading Edge, 40(8), 584–589.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dean, T., Quigley, J., MacDonald, S. and Readman, C. [2016]. The design of optimized broadband vibroseis sweeps. The Leading Edge, 35(8), 684–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dean, T., Tulett, J. and Barnwell, R. [2018]. Nodal land seismic acquisition: The next generation. First Break, 36, 47–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hart, B., Sarzalejo, S. and McCullagh, T. [2007]. Seismic stratigraphy and small 3D seismic surveys. The Leading Edge, 26(7), 876–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ishiyama, T., Sato, H., Abe, S., Kawasaki, S. and Kato, N. [2019]. High-resolution 3D seismic reflection imaging across active faults and its impact on seismic hazard estimation in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Technophysics, 689, 79–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaprowski, N. and Stewart, R. [2004]. 3C-3D seismic micro-survey at a Maya plaza ruin in Belize, Central America. CSEG Recorder, 29(9).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Monrigal, O., de Jong, I. and Duarte, H. [2017]. An ultra-high-resolution 3D marine seismic system for detailed site investigation. Near Surface Geophysics, 15(4), 335–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pavlova, M., Grant, M. and Dean, T. [2021]. Maximising the value of high-definition 3D coal seismic data. Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pranoto, N., Lawell, E., Dean, T. and Grant, M. [2022]. Lighting up the dark – the use of 3D seismic to optimise mine plans at structurally complex Blackwater mine. 12th International Mining Geology Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stewart, R., Spikes, K., Sisson, J., Hall, S., Huang, J. and Danbom, S. [2012]. Outstanding in the field: Hands-on geophysical education. The Leading Edge, 31, 278–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Strobbia, C., Bayly, M., Sweeney, D., Dean, T., Pavlova, M. and Grant, M. [2021]. Overburden measurement for coal mine management with 3D high resolution compressional and shear velocity seismic inversion. Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Strobbia, C., Re, S., Dean, T., Grant, M., Bayly, M., Nightingale, M. and Sweeney, D. [2021]. Integrated Seismic Exploration for Open-Cut Mining: The Importance of the Near Surface. First Break, 39(8), 87–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Urosevic, M., Kepic, A., Sheppard, S. and Johnson, D. [2008]. Nickel exploration with 3D seismic – Lake Lefroy, Kambalda, WA. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3607–3608.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vermeer, G. J. O. [2012]. 3D Seismic Survey design, 2nd Ed. SEG, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2025004
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2025004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error