Land 3D Acquisition Design: Theory of Wavefield Sampling. Part 2: Present 3D Design Tests for Environmentally Sustainable Sparse Perturbed Parallel Geometries

References

1. Claerbout, J. F. [2004]. Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing versus Inversion: Chapter 8, Missing-data restoration p 181–211.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cambois, G. [2001]. AVO and the general inverse theory. CSEG Recorder, 26(6).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cary, P. W. [1999]. Common-offset-vector gathers: An alternative to cross-spreads for wide-azimuth 3-D surveys. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1496–1499.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cordsen, A., Galbraith, M., Peirce, J., and Hardage, B. A. [2000]. Planning land 3-D seismic surveys. Geophysical Developments, 9. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Crook, A. [2018]. Seismic Acquisition Innovations Applied in Canada. CSEG Recorder, 43(5), 22–29.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crook, A., McGrory, R., Baker, N., and Westlake, A. [2019]. Transitioning to High Density Vibroseis Seismic Acquisition: A Case Study. GeoConvention conference abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crook, A., Bossaer, S., Boutin, M., Contenti, S., Crook, C., Nwafor, K., and Sun, F. [2021]. Case study: The use of miniaturized seismic sources for reduced environmental impact. 82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition Extended Abstracts, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crook, A. [2022]. Evaluating seismic acquisition techniques for reduced environmental impact. Second EAGE Workshop on Near-Surface and Mineral Exploration in Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia (Abstract).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Crook, A., Naghizadeh, M., Vermeulen, P., Gagnier, D., and Reine, C. [2023]. The use of miniaturized seismic sources for reduced environmental impact. First Break, 41(1), 77–84.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cova, R., Rodriguez, M., Goodway, B., Vermeulen, P., Crook, A., and Pardasie, W. [2023]. Sustainable subsurface imaging technology part 2: Using AVO seismic inversion as a tool to assess seismic survey designs. Recent Discoveries, Exploration Opportunities, and Sustainable Development Strategies in Caribbean Basins, AAPG Workshop Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Duncan, E., O'Byrne, A., and Dalsin, J. [2014]. Real vs. '5D’ Data: An analysis of acquired vs. interpolated data in both the post-stack and pre-stack domains for parallel and orthogonal geometries. CSEG Recorder, 39(3).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Goodway, W., and Ragan, B. [1996]. “Mega-Bin”: Toward a cost-effective "near symmetric patch geometry for improved S/N & resolution from regular acquisition sampling and cooperative image processing. CSEG Convention Abstracts, 99–102.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goodway, W., and Ragan, B. [1996]. MegaBin patent “Three-dimensional seismic acquisition” awarded to PanCanadian. Patent number 5787051.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goodway, B., Chen, T., and Downton, J. [1997]. Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters; “λρ”, “μρ”, & “λ/μ fluid stack”, from P and S inversions. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 183–186.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goodway, W. [2013]. Cost-efficient acquisition to reduce coarse land 3D line spacings through beyond Nyquist interpolation and wavefield reconstruction for signal and noise. CSEG Convention Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goodway, B., Cova, R., Pardasie, W., Crook, A., Naghizadeh, M., Crook, C., Hons, M., & Rodriguez, M. [2024]. Land 3D Acquisition Design: Theory of wavefield sampling. part 1: Past 3D design testing and assessment of cross-spread and parallel geometries. First Break, 42(9), 59–70.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jiang, T., Jiang, Y., Gong, B., Li, T., Huang, C., Mondriel, S., and Garcia, V. [2020]. Shot domain seismic reconstruction with EPOCS. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2020, 3309–3313.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Larson, A. [2020]. A review of exploration tools and techniques to support the COSIA Land Challenge: Near Zero Footprint Seismic Exploration. https://www.cclmportal.ca/resource/review-exploration-tools-and-tech-niques-support-cosia-land-challenge-near-zero-footprint.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Linden, D. A. [1959]. A discussion of sampling theorems. Proceedings of the IRE, 47(7), 1219–1226.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Liu, B., and Sacchi, M. D. [2004]. Minimum weighted norm interpolation of seismic records. Geophysics, 69(6), 1560–1568.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Monk, D. J. [2009]. Fresnel zone binning: Application to 3D seismic fold and coverage assessments. The Leading Edge, 28(3), 288–295.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Monk, D. J. [2010]. Fresnel-zone binning: Fresnel-zone shape with offset and velocity function. Geophysics, 75(1), T9–T14.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Monk, D. J. [2020]. Survey design and seismic acquisition for land, marine, and in-between in light of new technology and techniques. SEG Distinguished Instructor, 23. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Naghizadeh, M. [2012]. Seismic data interpolation and denoising in the frequency-wavenumber domain. Geophysics, 77(2), V71–V80.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Naghizadeh, M., and Sacchi, M. D. [2010]. On sampling functions and Fourier reconstruction methods. Geophysics, 75(6), WB137–WB151.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Naghizadeh, M., and Sacchi, M. [2013]. Multidimensional de-aliased Cadzow reconstruction of seismic records. Geophysics, 78(1), A1–A5.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Naghizadeh, M. [2015]. Double-weave 3D seismic acquisition — Part 1: Sampling and sparse Fourier reconstruction. Geophysics, 80(6), WD143–WD162.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Naghizadeh, M., Vermeulen, P., Crook, A., Birce, A., Ross, S., Stanton, A., Rodriguez, M., and Cookson, W. [2023]. EcoSeis: A novel acquisition method for optimizing seismic resolution while minimizing environmental footprint. The Leading Edge, 42(1), 61–68.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nyquist, H. [1928]. Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory: Trans. Am.Inst.Elec.Eng. 47, 617–644.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ourabah, A., Bradley, J., Hance, T., Kowalczyk-Kedzierska, M., Grimshaw, M., and Murray, E. [2015]. Impact of acquisition geometry on AVO/ AVOA attributes quality - A decimation study onshore Jordan. Proceedings of the 77th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pawelec, I., and Sava, P. [2024]. High dynamic range land wavefield reconstruction from randomized acquisition. Geophysics, 89, V563–V572.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shannon, C. E. [1949]. Communication in the presence of noise. Proceedings of the IRE, 37(1), 10–21.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Spitz, S. [1991]. Seismic trace interpolation in the F-X domainCommunication in the presence of noise. Geophysics, 56(6), 785–794.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Trad, D., and Deere, J. [2005]. Understanding land data interpolation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2158–2161.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Trad, D. [2009]. Five-dimensional interpolation: Recovering from acquisition constraints. Geophysics, 74(6), V123–V132.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Vassallo, M., Özbek, A., Özdemir, K., and Eggenberger, K. [2010]. Crossline wavefield reconstruction from multicomponent streamer data: Part 1 — Multichannel interpolation by matching pursuit (MIMAP) using pressure and its crossline gradient. Geophysics, 75(6), WB53–WB67.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vermeer, G. J. O. [1994]. 3-D symmetric sampling. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 906–909.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Vermeer, G. J. O. [1995]. 3D symmetric sampling in land data acquisition. CSEG Annual Convention Abstracts, 169–170.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Vermeer, G. J. O. [2002]. 3-D seismic survey design. Geophysical Reference Series, 12. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Vermeer, G. J. O. [2022]. Comments on Fresnel zone binning — Can it be used to determine maximum allowable holes in coverage of long offsets?The Leading Edge, 41(6), 418–422.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Vermeulen, P., Crook, A., Naghizadeh, M., and Ross, S. [2022]. Turn your seismic program into a lean, green, resolution machine. GeoConvention Conference Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]