Utility of the Geological Carbon Sequestration (GCS) Business: Potential Perils and Scenarios till 2150 and Beyond

References

1. Afagwu, C. and Weijermars, R. [2024]. Sensitivity Analysis of CO2-Migration Paths in Geological Carbon-Dioxide Sequestration: Case Study of the Gorgon GCS Project. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4985775.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ali, M., Jha, N.K., Pal, N., Keshavarz, A., Hoteit, H. and Sarmadivaleh, M. [2022]. Recent advances in carbon dioxide geological storage, experimental procedures, influencing parameters, and future outlook. Earth-Science Reviews, 225, 103895, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earsci-rev.2021.103895.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brosch, T. [2021]. Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: a review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.001.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Capros, P., Zazias, G., Evangelopoulou, S., Kannavou, M., Fotiou, T., Siskos, P., De Vita, A. and Sakellaris, K. [2019]. Energy-system modelling of the EU strategy towards climate-neutrality. Energy Policy, 134, 110960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110960
   [Google Scholar]
5. EDF. [2024]. Permian project is measuring and reporting oil and gas methane emissions like never before. https://www.edf.org/energy/were-analyzing-methane-emissions-worlds-largest-oil-patch.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E.J. and Shine, K.P. [2016]. Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43(24), 12614–12623. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071930.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hardin, G. [1968]. The tragedy of commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hauber, G. [2023]. Norway's Sleipner and Snøhvit CCS: Industry models or cautionary tales. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. https://ieefa.org/resources/norways-sleipner-and-snohvit-ccs-industry-models-or-cautionary-tales.
   [Google Scholar]
9. IEA. [2021]. Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050. Interactive iea.li/nzeroadmap.
   [Google Scholar]
10. IEA. [2023]. Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Net Zero Transitions: A World Energy Outlook Special Report on the Oil and Gas Industry and COP28. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/317cbf59-en.
    [Google Scholar]
11. IPCC. [2022]. Emissions Trends and Drivers. In IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.004.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jacobson, T.A., Kler, J.S., Hernke, M.T., Braun, R.K., Meyer, K.C. and Funk, W.E. [2019]. Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nat Sustain, 2, 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0323-1.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Keeling, F.H., Powell, F.L., Shaffer, G., Robbins, P.A. and Simonson, T.S. [2021]. Impacts of Changes in Atmospheric O2 on Human Physiology. Is There a Basis for Concern?Front. Physiol., Sec. Environmental, Aviation and Space Physiology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.571137.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lizana, J.J. [2024]. Analysis of the Theory of Marginal Utility and Marxism according to Bukharin. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5008407.
    [Google Scholar]
15. NEMS. [2024]. National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) modules. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/nems/documentation/.
    [Google Scholar]
16. NOAA. [2022]. History of atmospheric carbon dioxide from 800,000 years ago until the end of the most recent GLOBALVIEW+ CO2 collection. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/history.html.
    [Google Scholar]
17. OECD. [2007]. Ranking of the World's cities most exposed to coastal flooding today and in the future. OECD Environment Working Paper No. 1 (ENV/WKP(2007)1). https://climate-adapt.eea.europa.eu/en/metadata/publications/ranking-of-the-worlds-cities-to-coastal-flooding/11240357.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Peischl, J.S.J., Eilerman, J.A., Neuman, K.C., Aikin, J., de Gouw, J.B., Gilman, S.C., Herndon, R., Nadkarni, M., Trainer, C., Warneke, T. and Ryerson, B. [2018]. Quantifying methane and ethane emissions to the atmosphere from Central and Western U.S. oil and natural gas production regions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123(14), 7725–7740. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028622.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Rekenkamer [2024]. NL Court of Audit. https://english.rekenkamer.nl/latest/news/2024/03/28/if-co2-prices-go-up-industry-benefits-most-from-porthoss-carbon-storage-under-the-north-sea.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Saksvikrønning, H. [2021]. The Flexible Cap — EU's 'ETS Carbon Tax’. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17085.38888.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sweet, W.V. et al. [2022]. Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States: Updated Mean Projections and Extreme Water Level Probabilities Along U.S. Coastlines. NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 111 pp. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/hazards/sealevelrise/noaa-nos-techrpt01-global-regional-SLR-scenarios-US.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Trenberth, K.E. and Smith, L. [2005]. The mass of the atmosphere: A constraint on global analyses. J. Clim., 18, 864–875. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3299.1.
    [Google Scholar]
23. USDA. [2020]. Carbon Dioxide Health Hazard Information Sheet. https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2020-08/Carbon-Dioxide.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Weijermars, R. [2011]. Can we close Earth's sustainability gap?Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 4667–4672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.085.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Weijermars, R. [2024a]. Concurrent Challenges in Practical Operations and Modeling of Geological Carbon-dioxide Sequestration: Review of the Gorgon Project and FluidFlower Benchmark Study. Energy Strategy Reviews, 56, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101586.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Weijermars, R. [2024b]. Deferring flood damage in coastal lowlands: assessing surface uplift by geo-engineered CO2-sequestration with easy-to-use land-uplift model. First Break, 42(4), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024033.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Weijermars, R. [2024c]. CO2 Storage capacity classification and compliance. First Break, 42(11), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024100.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Weijermars, R., Afagwu, C., Tian, Y. and Alves, I.N. [2025]. Estimation of Storage Capacity Coefficients: Porthos GCS Project Case Study. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, in review.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Weijermars, R., Taylor, P., Bahn, O., Das, S.R. and Wei, Y.-M. [2012]. Review of models and actors in energy mix optimization — can leader visions and decisions align with optimum model strategies for our future energy systems?Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2011.10.001.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Wildenborg, T., Loeve, D. and Neele, F. [2022]. Large-scale CO2 transport and storage infrastructure development and cost estimation in the Netherlands offshore. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 118, 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103649.
    [Google Scholar]
31. World Bank. [2023]. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2006-9.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Zhang, Y. et al. [2020]. Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space. Science Advances, 6(17). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120.
    [Google Scholar]