A Breakthrough in the Imaging of a CO2 Plume — using OBN Data to the Full

References

1. Carter, A. J., Caceres, V.A.T., Duffaut, K. and Stovas, A. [2020]. Velocity-attenuation model from check-shot drift trends in North Sea well data. Geophysics, 85, D65–D74.
   [Google Scholar]
2. David, S., Cho, E., Stock, G., Kroode, F.T. and Zuberi, M.A.H. [2024]. Sparse OBN acquisition in shallow water at CCS Sleipner field: the role of multiples in FWI. SEG IMAGE. https://library.seg.org/doi/10.1190/image2024-4093367.1
   [Google Scholar]
3. David, S., Kroode, F.T., Cho, E., Zuberi, M.Stock, G., Baldock, S., Mispel, J., Westerdahl, H., Thompson, M. and Pedersen, S. [2024]. Short streamers and sparse OBN acquisition: Potential for CCS monitoring?First Break, 42(11), 49–57.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dehghan-Niri, R., Pedersen, Å.S., Thompson, M., Furre, A.-K., David, S., Westerdahl, H. and Holm-Trudeng, T. [2024]. Seismic mini-streamers as a potential method for CO2 storage monitoring. First Break, 42(10), 59–65.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eiken, O., Ringrose, P, Hermanrud, C., Nazarian, B., Torp, T.A. and Høier, L. [2011]. Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snøhvit. Energy Procedia, 4, 5541–5548. ISSN 1876-6102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.541
   [Google Scholar]
6. Furre, A.-K. and Eiken, O. [2014]. Dual sensor streamer technology used in Sleipner CO2 injection monitoring. Geophysical Prospecting, 62, 1075–1088.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Furre, A.-K., Warchoł, M.J., Alnes, H. and Pontén, A.S.M. [2024]. Sleipner 26 years: how well-established subsurface monitoring work processes have contributed to successful offshore CO2 injection. Geoenergy, 2, geoenergy 2024-015. https://doi.org/10.1144/geoenergy2024-015
   [Google Scholar]
8. Martinez, R., Vinje, V., Stovas, A., Ringrose, P, Mispel, J. and Landrø, M. [2024]. Learnings from recent full-waveform inversion analysis on the CO2 plume at Sleipner. 85th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Martinez, R., Vinje, V., Mispel, J., Ringrose, P, Stovas, A. and Landrø, M. [2025a]. Enhanced Imaging of Multi-Layer CO2 Plumes using Full-Waveform Inversion: Insights from the Sleipner Storage Site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. Published online at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5131891
   [Google Scholar]
10. Martinez, R., Vinje, V., Moore, H., Hollingworth, S., Ringrose, P. and Stovas, A. [2025b]. Full-waveform imaging the Sleipner CO2 plume using multi-azimuth OBN data. 86th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mispel, J., Furre, A., Sollid, A. and Maaø, F. [2019]. High frequency 3D FWI at Sleipner: A closer look at the CO2 plume. 81st EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Nazarian, B. and Furre, A-K. [2022]. Simulation Study of Sleipner Plume on Entire Utsira Using A Multi-Physics Modelling Approach. 16th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Norwegian Offshore Directorate [2024]. New industries - The Norwegian Offshore Directorate, Resource Report. https://www.sodir.no/aktuelt/publikasjoner/rapporter/ressursrapporter/ressursrap-port-2024
    [Google Scholar]
14. Zhang, Z., Mei, J., Lin, F., Huang, R. and Wang, P. [2018]. Correcting for salt misinterpretation with full-waveform inversion. 88th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1143–1147.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Wei, Z.Mei, J., Huang, R. and Wang, P. [2020]. FWI imaging: Full-wavefield imaging through fullwaveform inversion. 90th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 656–660.
    [Google Scholar]