Discussion of Paper on the Theory of Wavefield Sampling by Goodway et al. (2024)

References

1. Anstey, N. [1986]. Whatever happened to ground roll?The Leading Edge, 5(3), 40–45.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cary, P. [2011]. Aliasing and 5D interpolation with the MWNI algorithm; 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3080–3084.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Claerbout, J. F. [2004]. Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing versus Inversion: Chapter 8, Missing-data restoration. Note: this reference is missing in Goodway et al. (2024); Claerbout's book is mentioned in Goodway (2013) in a similar context. Copyright Stanford University, GPLv2. https://sepwww.stanford.edu/data/media/public/sep//prof/pvi.pdf (last accessed January 2025).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Goodway, W.N. and Ragan, B.R. [1998]. Three-dimensional seismic acquisition; United States Patent5, 787,051.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Goodway, B. [2013]. Cost efficient acquisition to reduce coarse land 3D line spacings through beyond Nyquist interpolation and wavefield reconstruction for signal and noise; CSEG GeoConvention.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Goodway, B., Cova, R., Pardasie, W., Crook, A., Naghizadeh, M., Crook, C., Hons, M. and Rodriguez, M. [2024]. Land 3D acquisition design: Theory of wavefield sampling. Part 1: Past 3D design testing and assessment of cross-spread and parallel geometries; First Break, 42(9), 59–70.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Liu, B. and Sacchi, M. [2004]. Minimum weighted norm interpolation of seismic records; Geophysics, 69, 1560–1568.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Monk, D. J. [2009]. Fresnel zone binning: Application to 3D seismic fold and coverage assessment; The Leading Edge, 28(3), 288–295.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Monk, D.J. [2020]. Survey design and seismic acquisition for land, marine, and in-between in light of new technology and techniques; SEG, Distinguished Instructor Series, 23.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Naranjo, J., Dieulangard, D. and Pfister, M. [2019]. Using carpet geometries in simultaneous source acquisition; 81st Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Th_P05_04.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Padhi, T. and Holley, T.K. [1997]. Wide azimuths — why not?The Leading Edge, 16, 175–177.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Regone, C., Fry, M. and Etgen, J. [2015]. Dense sources vs. dense receivers in the presence of coherent noise: a land modeling study; 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 12–16.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Sheriff, R.E. and Geldart, L.P. [1995]. Exploration seismology, 2nd edition; University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Spitz, S. [1991]. Seismic trace interpolation in the FX domain; Geophysics, 56, 785–794.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Vermeer, G. [1990]. Seismic wavefield sampling; SEG Geophysical References Series, no. 4.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Vermeer, G.J.O. [2012]. 3D seismic survey design, 2nd edition; SEG Geophysical References Series, no. 12.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Vermeer, G.J.O. [2015]. On the use of coincident shots and receivers in MegaBin geometry and in orthogonal geometry; CSEG Recorder, 40(4), 18–22.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Vermeer, G.J.O. [2020]. Are carpet geometries the way to go?First Break, 38, May, 33–41.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Vermeer, G.J.O. [2022]. Comments on Fresnel zone binning – Can it be used to determine maximum allowable holes in coverage of long offsets?The Leading Edge, 41(6), 418–422, followed with a Reply to the Discussion by David J. Monk, 423–425.
    [Google Scholar]