1887
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2026003
2026-01-01
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dean, T. [2024]. A comparison of two land nodal seismic recording systems. Exploration Geophysics, 55(3), 277–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dean, T. [2024]. Minimising the effects of obstacles on 2D seismic lines. Exploration Geophysics, 55(6), 786–796.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dean, T. [2025]. The accuracy of self-assigned land seismic node positions. Exploration Geophysics, 56(6).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dean, T. and Grant, M. [2021]. The evaluation of alternatives to pre-acquisition surveying for land seismic surveys. Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dean, T. and Grant, M. [2024]. A begineer’s guide to seismic sensors. ASEG Preview, 230, 38–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dean, T. and Grant, M. [2024]. An in-depth look at ultra-high-density 3D seismic acquisition for mining. Fourth International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, Expanded Abstracts, 2503–2507.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dean, T., Grant, M., Barnwell, R. and Barry, D. [2021]. A large-scale study of the reliability of land nodal seismic recording systems. First Break, 39(1), 69–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dean, T., Grant, M. and Nguyen, H. [2020]. Quality control of land nodal seismic recording systems. First Break, 38(1), 53–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dean, T., Grant, M. and Pavlova, M. [2021]. The Efficient Acquisition of High-Resolution 3D Seismic Surveys for Shallow Open-Cut Mining. First Break, 39(8), 43–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dean, T., Grant, M. and Sweeney, D. [2025]. The essential guide to land seismic nodal recording systems. ASEG Preview, 238, 58–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dean, T. and Hooi, J. [2025]. A comparison of data acquired using two different land nodal recording systems as part of a 3D seismic survey. Exploration Geophysics, 56(5), 35–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dean, T., Tulett, J. and Barnwell, R. [2018]. Nodal land seismic acquisition: The next generation. First Break, 36(1), 47–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goujon, N., Ourabah, A., Song, Z. and Gierz, C. [2021]. Which sensor for nodal seismic: Recording acceleration or velocity?First International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, Expanded Abstracts, 91–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jack, I. [1996]. Seismic System 2000. The Leading Edge, 15(10), 1126–1127.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Landrum, R. A. [1967]. Extraction of signals from random noise by crosscorrelation. 37th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Miller, R.D., Ivanov, J., Peterie, S., Bailey, B. and Sloan, S.D. [2014]. Near surface seismic imaging: One size does not fit all. SEG International Exposition and 84th Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 183–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ourabah, A. [2024]. Revisiting the Single Sensor vs Array Debate in the Light of New Nodal System Technology. First Break, 42(1), 71–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shirley, T.E., Linville, A.F., Hadidi, M.T., Davis, A.J., May, C.J. and Jurkevics, A. [1985]. A systems analysis of dynamic range in seismic exploration. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 528–530.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2026003
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2026003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error