1887
Volume 44, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

In controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) interpretation and model building, generating accurate resistivity models of the Earth is essential. When hydrocarbons are present, this process requires developing reservoir resistivity models, which typically involve linking expected hydrocarbon saturation to reservoir resistivity at the field scale. In predrill scenarios — where no well logs or core data are available — field-scale resistivity expectations must be derived through modelling. However, these models often rely on simplifying assumptions, such as constant reservoir properties combined with well-established resistivity-saturation relationships. While these relationships are valid at the core or log scale (cm to m), their applicability at the field scale (m to km) is questionable.

This paper examines the impact of these simplifying assumptions and modelling techniques, with a focus on the consequences of neglecting hydrocarbon saturation variability. We explore the relationship between sediment resistivity and water saturation across scales, from core and log to field scale. Our findings highlight the significant role of saturation variability, driven primarily by pressure build up with height and reservoir property variations. To address these challenges, we propose a workflow that accounts for the main sources of variability, enabling the upscaling of core-scale relationships to the field scale. We illustrate our proposed methodology using an example from the North Sea.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2026009
2026-02-01
2026-02-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archie, G.E. [1942]. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Petroleum Technology/American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, 5, 54–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Constable, S. [2010]. Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics, 75(5), A67–A81. doi: 10.1190/1.34834.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.34834.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. MacGregor, L. and Tomlinson, J. [2014]. Marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods in the hydrocarbon industry: A tutorial on method and practice. Interpretation, 2(3), SH13–SH32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2013-0163.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Savage, S.L. and Markowitz, H.M. [2009]. The Flaw of Averages: Why We Underestimate Risk in the Face of Uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2026009
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2026009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error