1887
Volume 36 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Within the last two years six new land seismic nodal acquisition systems have been launched, a pace unmatched even during the oil boom of the late 2000s/early 2010s. Any acquisition system that utilizes recording instrumentation that does not incorporate cables is often referred to as a nodal system. Some instruments, however, are beginning to blur what initially appears to be a clear boundary. For example, the U-Node system from Seismic Instruments utilizes a node that records data from up to 24 different channels that can then be stored locally or transmitted via Wi-Fi to a central system. The reduction in cabling, which is usually cited as the core advantage of nodal recording, is therefore limited to the backbone connecting the central recording system to the field recording units. In this paper we will concentrate on nodes that are designed to record data from a single point and are thus typically limited to six or fewer channels.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0061
2018-01-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldridge, D.
    Opseis 5500. Conference Opseis 5500, 409 – .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Angrove, R.
    [1985]. The Point Torment seismic survey: A semi-portable seismic operation.the APPEA Journal, 25, 248 – .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bays, A.R.
    [1984]. The impact of microelectronic technology on seismic data acquisition.The Leading Edge, 54–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burg, K.E.
    [1941]. Prospecting method and apparatus, patent, 2265513 A.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hawkins, J.E. and Wilcox, S.W.
    [1961]. Method and apparatus for continuous geophysical exploration. Patent US 2990904 A.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Herzog, G.
    [1962]. Radio-link system of seismic exploration. (Ed. US). US.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lansley, M., Laurin, M. and Ronen, S.
    [2008]. Modern land recording systems: How do they weigh up?The Leading Edge, 888–894.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lavergne, M.
    [1989]. Seismic Methods. Institut Francais du Petrole.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ray, C.H. and McDavid, W.T.
    [1979]. Telseis II: An expanded capability in radio telemetry seismic data acquisition. Geophysics, 44, 391.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shave, D.G
    . Seismic group recorder system. Conference Seismic group recorder system, 45–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Stewart, R.R., Chang, L., Sudarshan, S.K.V., Becker, A.T. and LiHuang
    . [2016]. An unmanned aerial vehicle with vibration sensing ability (seismic drone). SEG Annual Conference, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0061
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0061
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error