1887
Volume 36 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Seismic contractors and their clients constantly strive to increase the productivity of land seismic acquisition projects, and this combined with a trend for denser receiver geometries is resulting in much larger volumes of data being acquired on a daily basis. This has created a challenge for the checking of data consistency and its suitability for imaging, and has led to new approaches to in-field quality control.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0062
2018-01-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baris, S., Badel, N., Ribeiro, H., Layan, F., Herrmann, P., Lamerain, O., Jacques, A. and Faure, P.
    [2014]. Allowing Seismic Surveys to Boldly Go Where No Surveys Have Gone Before. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cotton, J., Beilles, M., Mahrooqi, S., Porter, J., Denis, M., Baris, S., Forgues, E. and Chauris, H.
    [2016]. Automated and Real-time Field PSTM - How to QC More Efficiently 10 Billion Traces Today and More Tomorrow. 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tims, H.A. and Cahill, D.R.
    [1983]. OPSEIS seismic recording system. 12th AAPG Annual Convention, Proceedings (Volume 1), 345–357.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wilcox, S.
    [2013]. Seismic data recording. US patent8,547,797.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [2015]. Drone support seismic acquisition. E&P Magazine, June, 67–69.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0062
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0062
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error