1887
Volume 36 Number 1
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

In the current challenging oil and gas environment it is now more important than ever to maximize return on investment. At a time when projects can face time and budget constraints, and the number of wells required to access both unconventional and conventional resources increases, improvements in the accuracy of seismic information can create significant value during the decision-making process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0065
2018-01-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BagainiC
    : “Acquisition and Processing of Simultaneous Vibroseis Data,” Geophysical Prospecting58, no. 1 (January 2010): 81–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BagainiC, BuntingT, El-EmamA, LaakeA and StrobbiaC
    : “Land Seismic Techniques for High-Quality Data,” Oilfield Review22, no. 2 (Summer 2010): 28–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BagainiC
    : “Low-Frequency Vibroseis Data with Maximum Displacement Sweeps,” The Leading Edge27, no. 5 (May 2008): 582–591
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BusanelloG, MitchellB
    Optimally Preparing the Surface Seismic Dataset for Azimuthal Studies and Inversion” Extended Abstracts 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2015 IFEMA Madrid, Spain, 1–4 June 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaiser, J.E.
    [1995] 3D prestack f-x coherent noise suppression. 65th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1,354–1,357.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Halliday, D., Bilsby, P., West, L. and Quigley, J.
    [2015] Scattered ground-roll attenuation using model-driven interferometry. Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 63, 116 – .
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HootmanB. W.
    “Robust Surface-Consistent Deconvolution: Creating Inversion Ready Land Data”, Extended abstracts: 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011Vienna, Austria, 23–26 May 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ji, Y., Kragh, E., and Bagaini, C.
    [2010] Noise attenuation methods for point-receiver land seismic data. 80th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3,545–3,549.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PooleA, BilsbyP, GilesM, MorganG
    , “Wide Azimuth Acquisition with Radial Domain Interpolation for Fluvial Morphology Interpretation. Extended Abstracts 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition 2015 IFEMA Madrid, Spain, 1–4 June 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Peter van BaarenP, BaioumyM, CunnellC, MohamedG, ZarkhidzeA, ZubayE and Al QuadiA
    : “Integrated High-Density Point-Source, Point-Receiver Land Seismic,”E&P86, no. 6 (June 2013)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SchonewilleM, ZhimeiYan, BaylyM and BisleyR
    , 2013, Matching pursuit Fourier interpolation using priors derived from a second dataset: 83rd SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 36–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Strobbia, C.L., Zarkhidze, A., May, R., Quigley, J., and Bilsby, P.
    [2011] Attenuation of aliased coherent noise: Model based attenuation for complex dispersive wave.First Break, 8(29), 93–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Strobbia, C.L., Zarkhidze, A., and May, R.
    [2012] Model-based attenuation for scattered dispersive waves.74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Vermeer, G.J.O.
    , 3-D Seismic survey design, 2nd Edition, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0065
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0065
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error