1887
Volume 36 Number 2
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

We all sense that ultimately ‘nature’ knows best. While we have tried to impose simple models and ordered processes on the world’s geology, we actually continue to encounter nature’s myriad uniqueness. As a result, we have grown comfortable with the butterfly effect of multiple influences randomly expressed at any scale from hand-sample to plate. We observe subsidence occurring offshore Argentina or Somalia while uplift occurs offshore Namibia and assume this is due to local tectonics acting ineffably and unconnectedly. That a sequence is deposited in a stable depositional regime in Angola while shelf collapse and instability produces the geology observed offshore Namibia is more troubling, but such contrasting tectonics acting simultaneously is again an expression of local plate stresses acting on local geology with non-linear results. This is our experience, so we understand our basin geologies on an isolated basin scale. With no common glue of a process we rely on an understanding of local basin tectonics. And this works but are we missing something?

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0074
2018-02-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hodgson, N. and Rodriguez, K.
    [2017]. Shelf Stability and Mantle Convection on Africa’s Passive Margins (part 1). First Break, 35 (03), 93–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, R.W.H. and Turner, J.P.
    [2010]. Gravitational collapse at continental margins: products and processes; an introduction. Journal of the Geological Society, 167, 569–570.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Scarselli, N., McClay, K. and Elders, C.
    [2016]. Seismic geomorphology of Cretaceous megaslides offshore Namibia (Orange Basin): Insights into segmentation and degradation of gravity-driven linked systems. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 75, 151–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoggard, M.J., White, N. and Al-Attar, D.
    [2016]. Global dynamic topography observations reveal limited influence of large-scale mantle flow. Nature Geoscience, 9, 456–463.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Conrad, C.P. and Lithgow-Bertelloni, C.
    [2002]. How Mantle Slabs Drive plate Tectonics, Science, 98 (5591), 207–210.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lentini, M., Fraser, S., Sumner, H.S. and Davies, R.J.
    [2010]. Geodynam-ics of the central South Atlantic conjugate margins: implications for hydrocarbon potential. Petroleum Geoscience, 16, 217–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jackson, M.P.A., Cramez, C. and Fonck, J.
    -M. [1999]. Role of subaerial volcanic rocks and mantle plumes in creation of South Atlantic margins: implications for salt tectonics and source rocks. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 17 (4), 477–498.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0074
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0074
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error