1887
Volume 36 Number 4
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Real-time microseismic detection at offshore hydrocarbon fields is on its way to becoming a standard monitoring tool. Recently, increased focus on injection and overburden surveillance for an improved health, safety and environment (HSE) and cost saving has led to this development. Several hydrocarbon fields are already equipped with permanent reservoir monitoring (PRM) systems with seismic sensors permanently installed at the seafloor (Caldwell et al., 2015), and similar installations are planned or under consideration for some other offshore fields. PRM systems are in principle designed for acquiring active time-lapse seismic data 1–2 times per years, and as such, they are not used during most of their lifetime. But apart from active seismic, PRM systems can also be used for recording passive seismic data. With appropriate processing and analysis methods, such as microseismic event detection, the continuous stream of passive data can be converted into useful real-time subsurface information. This results in improved HSE, and therefore a more valuable PRM system.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0084
2018-04-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, R.V.
    [1978]. Automatic earthquake recognition and timing single trace.Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 68, 1521–1532.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blunda, Y., and Chambers, K.
    [2013]. A generic procedure for noise suppression in microseismic data.CSPG/CSEF/CWLS GeoConvention, Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bussat, S., Bjerrum, L.W., Dando, B.D.E., Bergfjord, E.V., Iranpour, K., and Oye, V.
    [2016]. Offshore injection and overburden surveillance using real-time passive seismic.First Break, 34, 51–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Caldwell, J., Koudelka, E., Nesteroff, K., Price, R. and Zhang, P.
    [2015]. Seismic permanent reservoir monitoring (PRM) – A growing market.First Break, 33, 65–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elboth, T., Presterud, I.V. and Hermansen, D.
    [2010]. Time-frequency seismic data de-noising.Geophysical Prospecting, 58, 441–453, doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2009.00846.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00846.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Houbiers, M., Bussat, S. and Zarifi, Z.
    [2018]. Real-time microseismic monitoring at Grane, offshore Norway.80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts (submitted).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jones, I.F. and Levy, S.
    [1987]. Signal-to-noise ratio enhancement in multichannel seismic data via the Karhunen-Loéve transform.Geophysical Prospecting, 35, 22–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson, M., Andersen, M., Elde, R.M., Roy, S.S. and Skogland, S.M.
    [2015]. The startup of Permanent Reservoir Monitoring for Snorre and Grane.77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0084
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0084
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error