1887
Volume 36 Number 6
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Over the past eight years the evolution of machine learning in the form of unsupervised neural networks has been applied to improve and gain more insights in the seismic interpretation process (Smith and Taner, 2010; Roden et al., 2015; Santogrossi, 2016: Roden and Chen, 2017; Roden et al., 2017). Today’s interpretation environment involves an enormous amount of seismic data including regional 3D surveys with numerous processing versions and dozens if not hundreds of seismic attributes. This ‘Big Data’ issue poses problems for geoscientists attempting to make accurate and efficient interpretations. Multi-attribute machine learning approaches such as self-organizing maps (SOMs), an unsupervised learning approach, not only incorporates numerous seismic attributes, but often reveals details in the data not previously identified. The reason for this improved interpretation process is that SOM analyses data at each data sample (sample interval X bin) for the multiple seismic attributes that are simultaneously analysed for natural patterns or clusters. The scale of the patterns identified by this machine learning process is on a sample basis, unlike conventional amplitude data where resolution is limited by the associated wavelet (Roden et al., 2017).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0100
2018-06-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Roden, R. and Chen, C.
    [2017]. Interpretation of DHI Characteristics with machine learning.First Break, 35, 55–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Roden, R., Smith, T. and Sacrey, D.
    [2015]. Geologic pattern recognition from seismic attributes: Principal component analysis and self-organizing maps.Interpretation, 3, SAE59–SAE83.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Roden, R., Smith, T., Santogrossi, P., Sacrey, D. and Jones, G.
    [2017]. Seismic interpretation below tuning with multi-attribute analysis.The Leading Edge, 36, 330–339.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Santogrossi, P.
    [2017]. Technology reveals Eagle Ford insights.American Oil & Gas Reporter, January.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith, T. and Taner, M.T.
    [2010]. Natural clusters in multi-attribute seismics found with self-organizing maps. Extended Abstracts, Robinson-Treitel Spring Symposium by GSH/SEG, March 10–11, 2010, Houston, Tx.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0100
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0100
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error