Cloud computing for large-scale controlled-source electromagnetic inversions, Barents Sea, Norway

References

1. Abubakar, A., Habashy, T.M., Druskin, V.L., Knizhnerman, L. and Alum-baugh, D.
   [2008]. 2.5D forward and inverse modeling for interpreting low-frequency electromagnetic measurements.Geophyscis, 73(4), F165–F177, doi: 10.1190/1.2937466.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2937466 [Google Scholar]
2. Amundsen, L., Løseth, L., Mittet, R., Ellingsrud, S. and Ursin, B.
   [2006]. Decomposition of electromagnetic fields into upgoing and downgoing components.Geophysics, 71 (5), G211–G223, doi: 10.1190/1.2245468.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2245468 [Google Scholar]
3. Baltar, D. and Barker, N.D.
   [2015]. Prospectivity evaluation with 3D CSEM.First Break, 33, 55–62.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Buland, A., Løseth, L.O., Becht, A., Roudot, M. and Røsten, T.
   [2011]. The value of CSEM in exploration.First Break, 29(4), 69–76.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Constable, S.
   [2010]. Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration.Geophysics, 75(5), A67–A81, doi: 10.1190/1.3483451.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3483451 [Google Scholar]
6. Fanavoll, S., Gabrielsen, P.T. and Ellingsrud, S.
   [2014]. CSEM as a tool for better exploration decisions: Case studies from the Barents Sea, Norwegian Continental Shelf.Interpretation, 2(3), SH 55–SH66.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Granli, J.R., Hafslund Veire, H., Gabrielsen, P.T. and Morten, J.P.
   [2017]. Maturing broadband 3D CSEM for improved reservoir property prediction in the Realgrunnen Group at Wisting, Barents Sea.SEG International Exploration and 87th Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Karman, G.P, Ramirez, D., Voon, J. and Rosenquist, L.M.
   [2013]. More than a decade of CSEM in Shell: a global look back study. The 2nd International CSEM Conference CSEM in hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation.NGF, Abstracts and Proceedings of the Geological Society of Norway, 3 (Abstract).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Løseth, L.O., T. Wiik, Olsen, P.A. and J.O.Hansen
   , [2014]. Skrugard by CSEM — Prewell prediction and postwell evaluation.Interpretation, 2(3), SH67–SH77, doi: 10.1190/INT‑2013–0152.1.
   https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2013–0152.1 [Google Scholar]
10. Løseth, L.O., Hansen, J.O., Wiik, T., Roudot, M., Dubois, B. Nguyen, A.K. and Henriksen, L.B.
    [2015]. CSEM pre-well predictions in the Johan Castberg Area, Barents Sea.77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201413218.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Nguyen, K.A., Nordskag, J.I., Wiik, T., Kornberg Bjørke, A., Boman, L., Pedersen, O.M., Ribaudo, J. and Mittet, R.
    [2016]. Comparing large-scale 3D Gauss-Newton and BFGS CSEM inversion. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 872–877.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Nordskag, J.I. and AmundsenL.
    [2007]. Asymptotic airwave modeling for marine controlled-source electromagnetic surveying.Geophyscis, 72(6), F249–F255.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Plessix, R. and Mulder, W.A.
    [2008]. Resistivity imaging with con-trolled-source electromagnetic data: depth and data weighting.Inverse Problems, 24(3), 034012.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Tarantola, A.
    [1987]. Inverse Problem Theory.Elsevier Science B.V., ISBN 0-444-42765-1 (U.S.).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ward, S.H. and Hohmann, G.W.
    [1988]. Electronmagnetic Theory for Goephysical Applications. In: Nabighian, M.N. (Eds.) Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics – Volume 1, Theory. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 131–311.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Zach, J.J., Bjørke, A.K., Støren, T. and Maaø, F.
    [2008]. 3D inversion of marine CSEM data using a fast finite-difference time-domain forward code and approximate hessian-based optimization.78th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 614–618, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3063726.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Zach, J.J., Frenkel, M.A., Ridyard, D., Hincapie, J., Dubois, B. and Morten, J.P.
    [2009]. Marine CSEM time-lapse repeatability for hydrocarbon field monitoring.79th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 820–824.
    [Google Scholar]