1887
Volume 36 Number 12
  • ISSN: 0263-5046
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2397

Abstract

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is not some elusive, mystical technology that humanity is chasing, especially in regard to its usage in digital subsurface workflows. Artificial intelligence has been complementing human intelligence since the 1960s, and AI was deeply integrated into our personal and professional lives long before the technological revolutions of the 21st century. However, we tend to not realize how intrinsic AI is to our lives already. We are constantly moving the goalposts for defining AI as it solves more and more problems. This is known as the AI effect, where people tend to only think of AI as ‘whatever hasn’t been done yet’ (Hofstadter, 1979). This article attempts to review the historical melding of human and artificial intelligence in digital subsurface workflows, with some extra focus on the field of geophysics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0138
2018-12-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hofstadter, D.R.
    [1979]. Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books, United States.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K. J.
    [2005]. Seismic Attributes - A historical perspective. Geophysics, 70 (5), 3SO–28SO.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Roden, R.
    [2005]. The evolution of the interpreter’s toolkit - past, present, and future. The Leading Edge, 24, 72–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dragoset, B.
    [2005]. A historical reflection on reflections. The Leading Edge, 24 (1), s46–s70.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pepper, R. and Bejarano, G.
    [2005]. Advances in Seismic Fault Interpretation Automation. AAPG Search and Discovery, 40169.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hami-Eddine, K., Klein, R, Richard, L., de Ribet, B. and Grout, M.
    [2015]. A new technique for lithology and fluid content prediction from prestack data: An application to a carbonate reservoir. Interpretation, 3 (1), SC19–SC32.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Consentino, L.
    [2001]. Integrated Reservoir Studies, Editions Technip, Paris, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Craig, P.S., Goldstein, M., Seheult, AH. and Smith, JA.
    [1997]. Pressure matching for Hydrocarbon Reservoirs: A Case Study in the Use of Bayes Linear Strategies for Large Computer Experiments. Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics, 37–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Webb, S.J., Revus, D.E., Myhre, A.M., Goodwin, N.H., Dunlop, K.N.B, and Heritage, J.R.
    [2008]. Rapid Model Updating with Right-Time Data - Ensuring Models Remain. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Aarnes, I, Midtveit, K. and Skorstad, A.
    [2015]. Evergreen workflows that capture uncertainty - the benefits of an unlocked structure. First Break, 33, 89–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Marroquín, I.D.
    [2015]. Automated seismic facies for data integration: an example from Fort Worth Basin, Texas (USA). First Break, 33, 51–62.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0138
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0138
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error