Cone penetration logging for the direct detection of LNAPLs contamination

References

1. BeresM., HuggenbergerP., GreenA.G. and HorstmayerH.1999. Using two‐ and three‐dimensional georadar methods to characterize glaciofluvial architecture. Sedimentary Geology129(1‐2), 1–24.
   [Google Scholar]
2. FrolishR.K. and UrischD.W.2002. The use of geoelectrics and test wells for the assessment of groundwater quality of a coastal industrial site. Journal of Applied Geophysics50(3), 261–278.
   [Google Scholar]
3. GaramboisS., SénéchalP. and PerroudH.2001. On the use of combined geophysical methods to assess water content and water conductivity of near‐surface formations. Journal of Hydrology259(1‐4), 32–48.
   [Google Scholar]
4. GloaguenE., ChouteauM., MarcotteD. and ChapuisR.2001. Estimation of hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined aquifer using cokriging of GPR and hydrostratigraphic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics47(2), 135–152.
   [Google Scholar]
5. HarariZ.1996. Ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) for imaging stratigraphic features and groundwater in sand dunes. Journal of Applied Geophysics36(1), 43–52.
   [Google Scholar]
6. NakashimaY., ZhouH. and SatoM.2001. Estimation of groundwater level by GPR in an area with multiple ambiguous reflections. Journal of Applied Geophysics47(3‐4), 241–249.
   [Google Scholar]
7. TronickeJ., BlindowN., GrossR. and LangeM.A.1999. Joint application of surface electrical resistivity‐ and GPR‐measurements for groundwater exploration on the island of Spiekeroog, northern Germany. Journal of Hydrology223(1‐2), 44–53.
   [Google Scholar]
8. YaramanciU., LangeG. and HertrichM., et al. 2002. Aquifer characterisation using surface NMR jointly with other geophysical techniques at the Nauen/Berlin test site. Journal of Applied Geophysics50(1‐2), 47–65.
   [Google Scholar]