1887
Volume 2 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

High‐resolution magnetics and ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) prospecting methods are both employed over large areas (125 000 and 45 000 m2) at the Roman town of Flavia Solva in Austria. High‐resolution magnetics using a multisensor caesium gradiometer were used in a survey in a raster of 0.5 x 0.125 m. GPR measurements using a PulseEKKO 1000 device applying 450 and 900 MHz antennae were carried out in a raster of 0.5 x 0.05 m. The collected data are evaluated and visualized in grey scale, using the self‐developed software, and . In addition, the small prospected areas are combined automatically into one coherent image and transformed into global coordinate system (geo‐referencing) for archaeological interpretation in the Geographical Information System (GIS). The magnetic prospecting shows very clearly the extent of the Roman town of Flavia Solva. The Roman streets and walls appear in the magnetics as negative anomalies (black). The positive magnetic anomalies could be due to brick walls, which did not show up as structures in the GPR. On the other hand, GPR provides a lot of detailed three‐dimensional information about the archaeological structures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004004
2004-03-01
2020-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeckerH., 1995. From nanotesla to picotesla – a new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology. Archaeological Prospection2, 217–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eder‐HinterleitnerA., NeubauerW. and MelicharP.1996. Restoring magnetic anomalies. Archaeological Prospection3, 185–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. NeubauerW.2001. Magnetische Prospektion in der Archäologie. Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Komission44. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA. and MelicharP.1996. Collection, visualisation and simulation of magnetic prospection data. In: Interfacing the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (eds H.Kamermans and K.Fennema ), pp. 121–129. (Leiden: Anelacta Praehistorica Leidensia No. 28, CAA95)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., SerenS. and MelicharP.2002. Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria: An approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SerenS., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., NeubauerW. and MelicharP.2002. Large‐scale integrated archaeological prospection: Verifying magnetics, resistivity and GPR. 64th EAGE Conference, Florence, Italy, Extended Abstracts, D046.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004004
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error