1887
Volume 2 Number 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Surface‐wave analysis is a key tool for seismologists, ranging from near‐surface characterization in geotechnical applications to global seismology. Even in exploration seismology, where surface waves are regarded as a kind of noise, the fact that they typically represent the bulk of the recorded energy makes an understanding of surface‐wave propagation important. On the other hand, the heterogeneity of the near surface can make such analyses difficult since the heterogeneity is responsible for scattering and mode conversion.

Here, we show how multichannel seismic records of scattered surface waves can be used to obtain spatial images of the heterogeneity. We discuss both data processing and imaging and illustrate our method on laboratory‐scale data. Further, synthetic examples show that we can locate individual scatterers accurately, even when many scatterers produce interfering surface waves. Our laboratory results show that the method has the potential to locate near‐surface heterogeneities in the field.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004019
2004-08-01
2020-04-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Practice. W.H. Freeman & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BehoodianA., ScottJr.W.R. and McClellanJ.H.1999. Signal processing of elastic surface waves for localizing land mines. 33rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Asilomar, Ca.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BlonkB., HermanG.C. and DrijkoningenG.G.1995. An elastodynamic inverse scattering method for removing scattered surface waves from field data. Geophysics60, 1897–1905.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CampmanX.H., van WijkK., ScalesJ.A. and HermanG.C.2004. Imaging and suppressing near‐receiver scattered waves. Geophysics, in print.
  5. HansenP.C.1997. Rank‐deficient and Discrete Ill‐posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HarrM.E.1966. Foundations of Theoretical Soil Mechanics. McGraw–Hill Book Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HermanG.C. and PerkinsC.2004. Predictive scattered noise removal. 66th EAGE Conference, Paris, France, Extended Abstracts, D027.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HermanG.C., MilliganP.A., HugginsR.J. and RectorJ.W.2000. Imaging shallow objects and heterogeneities with scattered surface waves. Geophysics65, 247–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LeparouxD., BitriA. and GrandjeanG.2000. Underground cavity detection: a new method based on seismic Rayleigh waves. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics5, 33–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LosH.S., HermanG.C. and HölscherP.2001. Dynamic interaction between train wheels and the subsurface. Journal of Sound and Vibration247, 917–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MarsJ., RectorJ.W. and LazaratosS.K.1999. Filter formulation and wavefield separation of cross‐well seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting47, 610–636.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. NishizawaO., SatoT., LeiX. and KuwaharaY.1997. Laboratory studies of seismic wave propagation in inhomogeneous media using a laser Doppler vibrometer. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America87, 809–823.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. NoletG.1977. The upper mantle under Western Europe inferred from the dispersion of Rayleigh modes. Journal of Geophysics43, 265–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ParkC.B., MillerR.D. and XiaJ.1998. Ground roll as a tool to image near‐surface anomaly. 68th SEG Meeting, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 874–877.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ParkC.B., MillerR.D. and XiaJ.1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics64, 800–808.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. RiyantiC.D. and HermanG.C.2004. Elastic modeling of near‐surface scattering. 66th EAGE Conference, Paris, France, Extended Abstracts, P‐094.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RowbothamP.S. and GoultyN.R.1994. Wavefield separation by 3D filtering in cross‐hole seismic reflection processing. Geophysics59, 1065–1071.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ScalesJ.A. and MalcolmA.2003. Laser characterization of ultrasonic wave propagation in random media. Physics Review E67, 046618–046624.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ScalesJ.A. and van WijkK.1999. Multiple scattering attenuation and anisotropy of ultrasonic surface waves. Applied Physics Letters74, 3899–3901.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SniederR.K.1987. Surface wave holography. In: Seismic Tomography (ed. G.Nolet ), pp. 323–337. D. Reidel Pub. Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. StokoeIIK., WrightG.W., BayJ.A. and RoessetJ.M.1994. Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method. In: Geophysical Characterization of Sites (ed. R.D.Woods ). Oxford Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. TarantolaA.1984. Linearized inversion of seismic reflection data. Geophysical Prospecting32, 998–1015.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WestergaardH.M.1938. A problem of elasticity suggested by a problem in soil mechanics: Soft material reinforced by numerous strong horizontal sheets. Contributions toThe Mechanics of Solids, dedicated to S. Timoshenko on the occasion of his 60th birthday anniversary. The Macmillan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004019
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2004019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error