Application of signal dependent rank‐order mean filter to the removal of noise spikes from 2D electrical resistivity imaging data

References

1. AbreuE., LightstoneM., MitraS.K. and ArakawaK.1996. A new efficient approach for the removal of impulse noise from highly corrupted images.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing5, 1012–1025.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BernstoneC., DahlinT., OhlssonT. and HoglandW.2000. DC‐resistivity mapping of internal landfill structures: Two pre‐excavation surveys.Environmental Geology39, 360–371.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BobachevA.A., MarchenkoM.N., ModinI.N., PervagoE.V., UrusovaA.V. and ShevninV.A.1996. New approaches to electrical soundings of horizontally inhomogeneous media.Physics of the Solid Earth31, 1075–1086.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ChambersJ.E., KurasO., MeldrumP.I., OgilvyR.D. and HollandsJ.2006. Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic and engineering investigations at a former waste‐disposal site.Geophysics71, B231–B239
   [Google Scholar]
5. ChambersJ.E., MeldrumP.I., OgilvyR.D. and WilkinsonP.B.2005. Characterisation of a NAPL‐contaminated former quarry site using electrical impedance tomography.Near Surface Geophysics3, 79–90.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChandraC., MooreM.S. and MitraS.K.1998. An efficient method for the removal of impulse noise from speech and audio signals.Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Circuits and Systems4, 206–208.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CornacchiuloD. and BagtzoglouA.C.2004. Geostatistical reconstruction of gaps in near‐surface electrical resistivity data.Vadoze Zone Journal3, 1215–1229.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DahlinT.1996. 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications.First Break14, 275–283.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DahlinT. and ZhouB.2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imagings with 10 electrode arrays.Geophysical Prospecting52, 379–398.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DailyW., RamirezA. and JohnsonR.1998. Electrical impedance tomography of a perchloroethelyne release.Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics2, 189–201.
    [Google Scholar]
11. DeyA. and MorrisonH.F.1979. Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped three‐ dimensional structures.Geophysics44, 753–780.
    [Google Scholar]
12. EdwardsL.S.1977. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced‐polarization.Geophysics42, 1020–1036.
    [Google Scholar]
13. GersztenkornA. and ScalesJ.A.1988. Smoothing seismic tomograms with alpha‐trimmed means.Geophysical Journal92, 67–72.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GharibiM. and BentleyL.R.2005. Resolution of 3‐D electrical resistivity images from inversions of 2‐D orthogonal lines.Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics10, 339–349.
    [Google Scholar]
15. GonzalezR.C. and WoodsR.E.1992. Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GrellierS., GuérinR., RobainH., BobachevA., VermeerschF. and TabbaghA.2008. Monitoring of leachate recirculation in a bioreactor landfill by 2D electrical resistivity imaging.Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics13, 351–359.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GriffithsD.H. and BarkerR.D.1993. Two‐dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology.Journal of Applied Geophysics29, 211–226.
    [Google Scholar]
18. deGroot‐HedlinC. and ConstableS.1990. Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two‐ dimensional models from magnetotelluric data.Geophysics55, 1613–1624.
    [Google Scholar]
19. GuérinR., BegassatP., BenderitterY., DavidJ., TabbaghA. and ThiryM.2004. Geophysical study of the industrial waste land in Mortagne‐du‐Nord (France) using electrical resistivity.Near Surface Geophysics2, 137–143.
    [Google Scholar]
20. HendersonR.P. and WebsterJ.G.1978. An impedance camera for spatially specific measurements of thorax.IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering25, 250–254.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LaBrecqueD.J., MilettoM., DailyW., RamirezA. and OwenE.1996. The effect of noise on Occam’s inversion of resistivity tomography data.Geophysics61, 538–548.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LokeM.H., AcworthI. and DahlinT.2003. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys.Exploration geophysics34, 182–187.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LokeH. and BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi Newton method.Geophysical Prospecting44, 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LytleR.J. and DinesK.A.1978. An impedance camera: A system for determining the spatial variation of electrical conductivity. California University, Livermore (USA). Lawrence Livermore Lab. Technical report.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL‐52413.
    [Google Scholar]
25. ManglemK.S., SinghP.K.B. and SinghS.B.2002. Impulse noise removal using fuzzy rank selection technique.Second International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 140–143.
    [Google Scholar]
26. MooreM.S., GabboujM. and MitraS.K.1999. Vector SD‐ROM filter for removal of impulse noise from colour images.EURASIP Conference DSP for Multimedia Communications and Services, Krakow, Poland.
    [Google Scholar]
27. MooreM.S. and MitraS.K.2000. Statistical threshold design for the two‐state signal dependent rank order mean filter.Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing1, 904–907.
    [Google Scholar]
28. PeltonW.H., RijoL. and Swift C.M.Jr. 1978. Inversion of two‐dimensional resistivity and induced polarization data.Geophysics43, 788–803.
    [Google Scholar]
29. RitzM., RobainH., PervagoE., AlbouyY., CamerlynckC., DescloitresM. et al. 1999. Improvement to resistivity pseudosection modelling by removal of near‐surface inhomogeneity effects: application to a soil system in south Cameroon.Geophysical Prospecting47, 85–101.
    [Google Scholar]
30. SasakiY.1989. Two‐dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole‐dipole resistivity data.Geophysics54, 254–262.
    [Google Scholar]
31. SasakiY.1992. Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation.Geophysical Prospecting40, 453–464.
    [Google Scholar]
32. WilkinsonP.B., MeldrumP.I., ChambersJ.E., KurasO. and OgilvyR.D.2006a. Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimised sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations.International Geophysical Journal167, 1119–1126.
    [Google Scholar]
33. WilkinsonP.B., KurasO., MeldrumP.I., ChambersJ.E. and OgilvyR.D.2006b. Comparison of the spatial resolution of standard and optimised electrical resistivity tomography arrays.Near Surface 2006, Helsinki, Finland.
    [Google Scholar]
34. ZhouB. and DahlinT.2003. Properties and effects of measurement errors on 2D resistivity imaging surveying.Near Surface Geophysics1, 105–117.
    [Google Scholar]