Comparison of instruments for geoelectrical soil mapping at the field scale

References

1. AllredB.J., DanielsJ.D. and EhsaniM.R.2008. Handbook of Agricultural Geophysics. CRC Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AllredB., EhsaniM.R. and SaraswatD.2006. Comparison of electromagnetic induction, capacitively‐coupled resistivity and galvanic contact resistivity methods for soil electrical conductivity measurement.Applied Engineering in Agriculture22, 215–230.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson‐CookC.M., AlleyM.M., RoygardJ.K.F., KhoslaR., NobleR.B. and DoolittleJ.A.2002. Differentiating soil types using electrical conductivity and yield maps.Soil Science Society of America Journal66, 1562–1570.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CorwinD.L. and LeschS.M.2005. Application of soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture46, 11–43.
   [Google Scholar]
5. B.J.Allred
   CorwinD.L. and LeschS.M.2008. Trends of soil electrical conductivity measurement using geophysical methods. In: Handbook of Agricultural Geophysics (eds B.J.Allred , J.DDaniels and M.R.Ehsani ), pp. 17–44.CRC Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. J.Stafford
   DabasM. and TabbaghA.2002. A comparison of EMI and DC methods used in soil mapping – theoretical considerations for precision agriculture. In: Precision Agriculture (eds J.Stafford and A.Werner ), pp. 121–129. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
7. B.J.Allred
   DanielsJ.J., VendlM., Ehsani, R.M. and AllredB.J.2008. Electromagnetic induction methods. In: Handbook of Agricultural Geophysics (eds B.J.Allred , J.DDaniels and M.R.Ehsani ), pp. 109–128. CRC Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DollW.E., GameyT.J., NyquistJ.E., MandellW., GroomD. and RohdewaldS.2001. Evaluation of new geophysical tools for investigation of a landfill, Camp Roberts, California.Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), Denver, Colorado, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DomschH. and GiebelA.2004. Estimation of soil textural features from soil electrical conductivity recorded using the EM38.Precision Agriculture3, 389–409.
   [Google Scholar]
10. EdwardsL.S.1977. A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP.Geophysics42, 1020–1036.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eijkelkamp2003. Operating Instructions. 14.01 EC‐probe Set for Soil Conductivity Measurements.Eijkelkamp Agrisearch Equipment.
    [Google Scholar]
12. FarahaniH.J. and FlynnR.L.2007. Map quality and zone delineation as affected by width of parallel swaths of mobile agricultural sensors.Biosystems Engineering96, 151–159.
    [Google Scholar]
13. J.V.Stafford
    GebbersR. and LückE.2005. Comparison of geoelectrical methods for soil mapping. In: Precision Agriculture ’05 (ed. J.V.Stafford ), pp. 473–479. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GebbersR. and LückE.2007. Der OhmMapper – Geoelektrik‐Kartierung mit kapazitiver Ankopplung. (The OhmMapper – geoelectrical mapping based on capacitive coupling).Landtechnik2, 82–83.
    [Google Scholar]
15. B.J.Allred
    GebbersR. and LückE.2008. Comparison of geoelectrical instruments in different soilscapes. In: Handbook of Agricultural Geophysics (eds B.J.Allred , J.DDaniels and M.R.Ehsani ), pp. 295–302. CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Geometrics2001. OhmMapper TR1 29005‐01 REV.F Operation Manual. Geometrics Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
17. ISO1995. Soil Quality Determination of Potential Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchangeable Cations Using Barium Chloride Solution Buffer at pH 8.1. International Organization for Standardization.
    [Google Scholar]
18. de JongE., BallantyneA.K., CameronD.R. and ReadD.W.L.1979. Measurement of apparent electrical conductivity of soils by an electromagnetic induction probe to aid salinity surveys.Soil Science Society of America Journal43, 810–812.
    [Google Scholar]
19. KachanoskiR.G., GregorichE.G. and van WesenbeckJ.1988. Estimating spatial variations of soil water content using noncontacting electromagnetic induction methods.Canadian Journal of Soil Science68, 715–722.
    [Google Scholar]
20. KerryR. and OliverM.2003. Variograms of ancillary data to aid sampling for soil surveys.Precision Agriculture4, 261–278.
    [Google Scholar]
21. KingJ.A., DampneyP.M.R., LarkR.M., WheelerH.C., BradleyR.I. and MayrT.R.2005. Mapping potential crop management zones within fields: Use of yield‐map series and patterns of soil physical properties identified by electromagnetic induction.Precision Agriculture6, 167–181.
    [Google Scholar]
22. KurasO., BeamishD., MeldrumP.I. and OgilvyR.D.2006. Fundamentals of the capacitive resistivity technique.Geophysics70, G135–G152.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LandonJ.R.1991. Booker Tropical Soil Manual. A Handbook for Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropics and Subtropics. Longman Group.
    [Google Scholar]
24. J.Stafford
    LundE., ChristyC. and DrummondP.1999. Practical applications of soil electrical conductivity mapping. In: Precision Agriculture ’99 (ed. J.Stafford ), pp. 771–779. Sheffield Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. McNeillJ.D.1980. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurements at low induction numbers.Geonics Technical Note TN‐6.
    [Google Scholar]
26. OldenbourgD.W. and LiY.1998. Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys.Geophysics64, 403–416.
    [Google Scholar]
27. PanissodC., DabasM., JolivetA. and TabbaghA.1997. A novel mobile multipole system (MUCEP) for shallow (0–3 m) geoelectrical investigation: The ‘Vol‐de‐canards’ array.Geophysical Prospecting45, 983–1002.
    [Google Scholar]
28. RoyA. and ApparaoA.1971. Depth of investigation in direct current methods.Geophysics36, 943–959.
    [Google Scholar]
29. SamouëlianA., CousinI., TabbaghA., BruandA. and RichardG.2005. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review.Soil and Tillage Research83, 173–193.
    [Google Scholar]
30. SchefferF. and SchachtschabelP.2002. Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde (Textbook of Soil Science).Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
31. G.Grenier
    SchmidhalterU., ZintelA. and NeudeckerE.2003. Calibration of electromagnetic induction measurements to survey the spatial variability of soils. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Precision Agriculture (eds G.Grenier and S.Blackmore ), pp. 479–484. Agro Montpellier.
    [Google Scholar]
32. SiegelS.1985. Nichtparametrische statistische Methoden. Fachbuchhandlung fuer Psychologie.(Translation of Siegel S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.McGraw‐Hill)
    [Google Scholar]
33. SudduthK.A., KitchenN.R., BolleroG.A., BullockD.G. and WieboldW.J.2003. Comparison of electromagnetic induction and direct sensing of soil electrical conductivity.Agronomy Journal95, 472–482.
    [Google Scholar]
34. SudduthK.A., KitchenN.R., WieboldW.J., BatchelorW.D., BolleroG.A., BullockD.G. et al. 2005. Relating apparent electrical conductivity to soil properties across the north‐central USA.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture46, 263–283.
    [Google Scholar]
35. TarrA.B., MoorK.J, BurrasC.L., BullockD.G. and DixonP.M.2005. Improving map accuracy of soil variables using soil electrical conductivity as a covariate.Precision Agriculture6, 255–270.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Veris2002. Veris Technologies 3100 Soil EC Mapping System.Operating Instructions. Pub. #OM 1CM02–1. Veris Technologies.
    [Google Scholar]
37. WhiteR.E.2006. Principles and Practices of Soil Science. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]