1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 8, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The applicability of tunnel‐to‐tunnel electrical resistance tomography (ERT) for imaging disruptive geological structures ahead of mining, in an igneous platinum mining environment is assessed. The geophysical targets of interest are slump structures or ‘potholes’ that disrupt the lateral continuity of the thin, tabular platinum orebodies of the Bushveld Complex, South Africa. The study involves a combination of model studies, laboratory property measurements and trial surveys. The property studies indicate that the problem reduces to the challenging scenario of a high‐resistivity background (orebody horizon) in which an even more resistive target (pothole) is embedded. The model studies show that ERT can potentially image disruptive potholes ahead of mining. It is further demonstrated that the 2D approach can generally be used as a reconnaissance tool but that a variety of 3D effects need to be considered and, in some instances, appropriate corrections should be applied. 3D scenarios that are considered include targets with limited extent perpendicular to the image plane, targets with a relatively small volume and targets that are asymmetrical about the image plane. Other 2D model assumption violations considered include the effect of tunnels and multi‐layered backgrounds. Finally, results from an experimental in‐mine survey are included to illustrate that ERT can be used to detect and delineate potholes ahead of mining.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2010 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010021
2010-06-01
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010021
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AraiE.1995. A resistivity tomography test survey in the Toyoha mine, Hokkaido, Japan. Exploration Geophysics25, 45–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BarkerR.D. and MooreJ.1998. The application of time‐lapse electrical tomography in groundwater studies. The Leading Edge17, 1454–1458.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BinleyA. and KemnaA.2005. DC resistivity and induced polarization methods. In: Hydrogeophysics (eds Y.Rubin & S. S.Hubbard ), pp. 129–156. Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. CawthornR.G.1999a. Platinum in South Africa. South African Journal of Science95, 481–489.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. CawthornR.G.1999b. The discovery of the platiniferous Merensky Reef in 1924. South African Journal of Geology102, 178–183.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Day‐LewisF., SinghaK. and BinleyA.2005. Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations. Journal of Geophysical Research110, B08206.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. DüwekeW. and TrickettJ.C.2001. Three‐dimensional reflection seismics as a tool to optimise mine design, planning and development in the Bushveld Igneous Complex. 7th Biennial SAGA Conference and Exhibition, Drakensburg, South Africa, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. EsoR.A., MaxwellM., OldenburgD.W. and UnrauJ.2006a. Delineation of water inflow in an underground potash mine with 3‐D electrical resistivity imaging. SAGEEP 2006 meeting, Seattle, Washington, USA, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. EsoR.A., OldenburgD.W. and MaxwellM.2006b. Application of 3D electrical resistivity imaging in an underground potash mine. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. GibertD., NicollinF., KergosienB., BossartP., NussbaumC., Grislin‐MouëzyA., ConilF. and HoteitN.2006. Electrical tomography monitoring of the excavation damaged zone of the Gallery 04 in the Mont Terri rock laboratory: Field experiments, modelling, and relationship with structural geology. Applied Clay Science33, 21–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GroomR.W. and AlvarezC.2002. 3D EM modelling – Application of the localised non‐linear approximator to near surface applications. SAGEEP 2002 meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. HabashyT.M., GroomR.W. and SpiesB.R.1993. Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering. Journal of Geophysical Research98, 1759–1775.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. JämtlidA., MagnussonK., OlssonO. and StenbergL.1984. Electrical borehole measurements for the mapping of fractures zones in crystalline rock. Geoexploration22, 203–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. KemnaA.2005a. CRTomo – 2D Complex Resistivity Inversion.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. KemnaA.2005b. CRMod, 2.5D Geoelectrical Modelling Tool, Version 1.2ip ed.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. KruschwitzS. and YaramanciU.2004. Detection and characterisation of the disturbed rock zone in claystone with the complex resistivity method. Journal of Applied Geophysics57, 63–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Leeb‐du ToitA.1986. The Impala platinum mines. In: Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, Vol. II: 1091–1106 (eds C.R.Anhaeusser and S.Maske ). Geological Society of South Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. MossomR.J.1986. The Atok platinum mine. In: Mineral Deposits of South Africa, Vol. II: 1143–1154 (eds C.R.Anhaeusser and S.Maske ). Geological Society of South Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. MurrayI.R.1997. On extending the localized non‐linear approximation to inductive modes. 59th EAGE meeting, Geneva, Switzerland, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. NoguchiK., GotoS., YudaT., FurayaK., ShibamotoM. and NishinoH.1991. In‐situ experimental study on resisitivity tomography in tunnels. 7th ISRM International Congress on Rock Mechanics, Aachen, Germany, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. RamirezA. and DailyW.1997a. Electrical Resistivity Monitoring of the Drift Scale Test in Yucca Mountain.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. RamirezA. and DailyW.1997b. Electrical Resistivity Monitoring of the Single Heater Test in Yucca Mountain.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. RamirezA. and DailyW.2001. Electrical imaging at the large block test – Yucca mountain, Nevada. Journal of Applied Geophysics46, 85–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. SasakiY. and MatsuoK.1993. Surface‐to‐tunnel resistivity tomography at the Kamaishi mine. Batsuri‐Tansa46, 128–133.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. ScottJ., LeeF., CarrollR. and RobinsonC.1968. The relationship of geophysical measurements to engineering and construction parameters in the Straight Creek Tunnel pilot bore, Colorado. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanics Abstracts5, 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. SlaterL., BinleyA., DailyW. and JohnsonR.2000. Cross‐hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 85–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. The South African Committee for Stratigraphy (SACS)
    The South African Committee for Stratigraphy (SACS) . 1980. Stratigraphy of South Africa, Handbook 8, Part 1: Lithostratigraphy of the Republic of South Africa, South West Africa/Namibia and the Republics of Bophuthatswana, Transkei and Venda.Department of Mineral and Energy Affairs, Geological Survey.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. TrickettJ.C., StevensonF., VogtD., MasonI., HargreavesJ., EybersH., FynnR. and MeyeringM.2000. The application of borehole radar to South Africa’s ultra‐deep gold mining environment. 8th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Van SchoorM.2009. Using electrical resistance tomography (ERT) and induced polarisation (IP) tomography to map potholes and iron‐rich ultramafic pegmatite bodies in South African platinum mines. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Van SchoorM., Du PisaniP. and VogtD.2006. High‐resolution, short‐range, in‐mine geophysical techniques for the delineation of South African orebodies. South African Journal of Science102, 355–360.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. ViljoenM.J. and HieberR.W.1986. The Rustenburg Section of Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, with reference to the Merensky Reef. In: Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, Vol. II (eds C.R.Anhaeusser and S.Maske ), pp. 1107–1134. Geological Society of South Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. ViljoenM.J., de KlerkW.J., CoetzerP.M., HatchN.P., KinlochE. and PeyerlW.1986a. The Union Section of Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited with reference to the Merensky Reef. In: Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, Vol. II (eds C.R.Anhaeusser and S.Maske ), pp. 1061–1090. Geological Society of South Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. ViljoenM.J., TheronJ., UnderwoodB.M., WaltersJ., WeaverJ. and PeyerlW.1986b. The Amandelbult Section of Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited with reference to the Merensky Reef. In: Mineral Deposits of Southern Africa, Vol. II (eds C.R.Anhaeusser and S.Mask ), pp. 1041–1060. Geological Society of South Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. VogtD., Van SchoorM. and Du PisaniP.2005. The application of radar techniques for in‐mine feature mapping in the Bushveld Complex of South Africa. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy105, 447–452.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. YaramanciU.2000. Geoelectric exploration and monitoring in rock salt for the safety assessment of underground waste disposal sites. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 181–196.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. ZhouB. and DahlinT.2003. Properties and effects of measurement errors on 2D resistivity imaging surveying. Near Surface Geophysics1, 105–117.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010021
Loading
In‐mine (tunnel‐to‐tunnel) electrical resistance tomography in South African platinum mines
Near Surface Geophysics 8, 563 (2010); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2010021
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010021
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010021
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error