1887
Volume 8, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Diagnostics of historical buildings is crucial for the definition of a reliable restoration project or in the study of the seismic behaviour of a building. This was one of the objectives of the international project ‘Advanced techniques for Seismic RISK Reduction in Mediterranean Archipelago Regions’ (SE RISK). In particular, in the framework of the project, the present work is concerned with the exploitation of GPR for the inspection of two historical buildings of Crete Island, Greece, the Prefecture of Chania and Venizelo’s House. In particular, the surveys aim at gaining information about the structure of the floors fracture areas and structural joint zones via high‐resolution measurements thanks to the use of a 1500 MHz nominal centre frequency antenna. With regard to the Prefecture of Chania, the specific aim of the survey was to detect and localize fracture areas and joint zones thanks to a scanning line acquired orthogonally to the ‘defects visible’ at the surface of the floors. In Venizelo’s House, the aim was to detect and localize fracture areas in the stone masonry.

Besides the classical time data processing, a microwave tomography based approach was applied to the data. The comparison between the two approaches has shown that the results of both the procedures are in good agreement suggesting both the reliability of the standard processing routine and the new microwave approach. In addition, the microwave tomographic approach provides more detailed and higher resolution images allowing an easier data interpretation. The microwave tomographic approach also offers the advantage of performing an automatic procedure, thus mitigating the risk of introducing subjective elements as in the case of the classical approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010039
2010-07-01
2020-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BavusiM., GiocoliA., BalascoM., FavulliG., MoscatelliM., MinguzziM., GnesiD. and VirgiliS.2009. Magnetic and ground penetrating radar surveys for the research of Medieval settlements in the inland of the Marche Region (Italy). European Geosciences Union meeting, 19–24 April, Vienna, Austria, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BerteroM. and BoccacciP.1998. Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging.Institute of Physics Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BindaL., SaisiA. and ZanziL.2008. Radar investigation and diagnosis of historic masonry. 12th International Conference Structural Faults & Repair, 10–12 June, Edinburgh, UK, Expanded Abstracts.
  4. CameronJ., DemoulinC., DiamantiN., GiannopoulosA. and FordeM.C.2008. Aspects of GPR testing of masonry arch bridges. 12th International Conference Structural Faults & Repair, 10–12 June, Edinburgh, UK, Expanded Abstracts.
  5. ChianeseD., D’EmilioM., BavusiM., LapennaV. and MacchiatoM.2005. Magnetic and ground probing radar measurements for soil pollution mapping in the industrial area of Val Basento (Basilicata Region, Southern Italy): A case study. Environmental Geology49, 389–404. doi: 10.1007/s00254‐005‐0082‐3
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De La HazaA.O., PetersenC.G. and SamokrutovA.2008. Three dimensional imaging of concrete structures using ultrasonic shear waves. 12th International Conference Structural Faults & Repair, 10–12 June, Edinburgh, UK, Expanded Abstracts.
  7. ForestR. and UtsiV.2004. Non destructive crack depth measurements with Ground Penetrating Radar. 10th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 21–24 June, Delft, the Netherlands, Expanded Abstracts.
  8. GrandjeanC. and GourryJ.C.1996. GPR data processing for 3D fracture mapping in a marble quarry (Thassos, Greece). Journal of Applied Geophysics36, 19–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HugenschmidtJ. and MastrangeloR.2006. GPR inspection of concrete bridges. Cement & Concrete Composites28, 384–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LazzariM., GeraldiE., LapennaV. and LoperteA.2006. Natural hazards vs human impact: an integrated methodological approach in geomorphological risk assessing on Tursi historical site, southern Italy. Landslides3, 275–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LeoneG. and SoldovieriF.2003. Analysis of the distorted Born approximation for subsurface reconstruction: truncation and uncertainties effect. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing41, 66–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LeucciG., PersicoR. and SoldovieriF.2007. Detection of fractures from GPR data: the case history of the Cathedral of Otranto. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering4, 452–461.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LoperteA., CristalloF., LapennaV., BavusiM., PiscitelliS. and RizzoE.2004. GPR and electrical tomography survey to detect cavities in the urban area of Matera (Southern Italy). Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium, 28–31 March, Pisa, Italy, Expanded Abstracts.
  14. McCannD.M. and FordeM.C.2001. Review of NDT methods in the assessment of concrete and masonry structures. NDT&E International34, 71–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. OhtsuM., TokayM., OhnoK. and IsodaT.2008. Elastic‐wave methods for crack detection and damage evaluation in concrete. 12th International Conference Structural Faults & Repair, 10–12 June, Edinburgh, UK, Expanded Abstracts.
  16. PiscitelliS., RizzoE., CristalloF., LapennaV., CroccoL., PersicoR. and SoldovieriF.2007. GPR and microwave tomography for detecting shallow cavities in the historical area of “Sassi of Matera” (southern Italy). Near Surface Geophysics5, 275–284. doi:10.3997/1873‐0604.2007009
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SoldovieriF., HugenschmidtJ., PersicoR. and LeoneG.2007. A linear inverse scattering algorithm for realistic GPR applications. Near Surface Geophysics5, 29–42. doi:10.3997/1873‐0604.2006016
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Soldovieri, F., PersicoR. and LeoneG.2006. A microwave tomographic imaging approach for multibistatic configuration: The choice of the frequency step. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement55, 1926–1934.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SoldovieriF. and SolimeneR.2010. Ground penetrating radar subsurface imaging of buried objects. In: Radar Technology, pp. 105–126. IN‐TECH. ISBN 9783902613493.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TsofliasG.P., Van GestelJ.P., BlankenshipD.D. and SenM.2004. Vertical fracture detection by exploiting the polarization properties of ground‐penetrating radar signals. Geophysics69, 803–810.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. UtsiV., BirtwisleA. and CoockJ.2008. Detection of subsurface reflective cracking using GPR. 12th International Conference Structural Faults & Repair, 10–12 June, Edinburgh, UK, Expanded Abstracts.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010039
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error