Deterministic deconvolution for GPR data in the t‐f domain †

References

1. BanoM.1996Modeling and inverse Q imaging of ground penetrating radar waves in 1 and 2D. Geophysical Research Letters23, 3123–3126.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BelinaF.A., DafflonB., TronickeJ. and HolligerK.2009. Enhancing the vertical resolution of surface georadar data. Journal of Applied Geophysics68, 26–35.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BerkhoutA. J.1977. Least‐squares inverse filtering and wavelet deconvolution. Geophysics42, 1369–1383.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BradfordJ.2007. Frequency‐dependent attenuation analysis of ground‐penetrating radar data. Geophysics72, J7–J16.
   [Google Scholar]
5. D.F.Findley
   DonohoD.1981. On minimum entropy deconvolution. In: Applied Time Series Analysis II (ed. D.F.Findley ), pp. 565–608. Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. EconomouN. and VafidisA.2010a. Spectral balancing of GPR data using time‐variant bandwidth in t‐f domain. Geophysics75, J19–J27.
   [Google Scholar]
7. EconomouN. and VafidisA.2010b. GPR data time varying deconvolution by kurtosis maximization.13th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 21–25 June, Lecce, Italy, Expanded Abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
8. IrvingJ.D. and KnightR.J.2003Removal of wavelet dispersion from ground‐penetrating radar data. Geophysics68, 960–970.
   [Google Scholar]
9. LahouarS.2003. Development of data analysis algorithms for interpretation of ground penetrating radar data.PhD Thesis. Department of Electrical Engineering, Virginia Tech.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LevyS. and OldenburgD.W.1987Automatic phase correction of common‐midpoint stacked data. Geophysics52, 51–59.
    [Google Scholar]
11. LongbottomJ., WaldenA.T. and WhiteR.E.1988. Principles and application of maximum kurtosis phase estimation. Geophysical Prospecting36, 115–138.
    [Google Scholar]
12. MargraveG.1998. Theory of nonstationary linear filtering in the Fourier domain with application to time‐variant filtering. Geophysics63, 244–259.
    [Google Scholar]
13. NetoP. and MedeirosW.2006. A practical approach to correct attenuation effects in GPR data. Journal of Applied Geophysics59, 140–151.
    [Google Scholar]
14. PorsaniM.J. and UrsinB.1996. Mixed‐phase deconvolution of seismic and ground‐penetrating radar data.66th SEG meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1603–1606.
    [Google Scholar]
15. RobinsonE. and TreitelS.1980. Geophysical Signal Analysis.Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
16. SavelyevT.G., Van KempenL., SahliH., SachsJ. and SatoM.2007. Investigation of time‐frequency features for GPR landmine discrimination. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing45, 118–129.
    [Google Scholar]
17. StockwellR., MansinhaG.L. and LoweR.P.1996. Localization of the complex spectrum: The S‐transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing44, 998–1001.
    [Google Scholar]
18. J.Pilon
    TodoeschuckJ.P., LaFlecheP.T., JensenO.G., JudgeA.S. and PilonJ.A.1992. Deconvolution of ground probing radar data. In: Ground Penetrating Radar, Geological Survey of Canada (ed. J.Pilon ), pp. 227–230.
    [Google Scholar]
19. TurnerG.1994. Subsurface radar propagation deconvolution. Geophysics59, 215–223.
    [Google Scholar]
20. VafidisA.1984. Deconvolution and filter design using skewness and kurtosis criteria. MSc thesis, Department of Mining, Metallurgy and Applied Geophysics of McGill University.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Van der BaanM.2008. Time‐varying wavelet estimation and deconvolution by kurtosis maximization. Geophysics73, V11–V18.
    [Google Scholar]
22. WhiteR.E.1988. Maximum kurtosis phase correction. Geophysical Journal International95, 371–389.
    [Google Scholar]
23. XiaJ., FranseenE.K., MillerR.D. and WeisT.V.2004. Application of deterministic deconvolution of ground‐penetrating radar data in a study of carbonate strata. Journal of Applied Geophysics56, 213–229.
    [Google Scholar]