1887
Volume 10 Number 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Physically‐based ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data processing is essential for quantitative characterization of soils and materials. A novel near‐field GPR antenna model coupled with layered media Green's functions was used to investigate the effect of antenna‐medium coupling in the analysis of GPR data. The radar antennas are modelled using an equivalent set of infinitesimal electric dipoles and characteristic, frequency‐dependent, global reflection and transmission coefficients. These coefficients determine through plane wave decomposition, wave propagation between the radar reference plane, point sources and field points. We calibrated an actual commercial 400 MHz time‐domain antenna, from which synthetic GPR data sets were generated. We observed that, depending on the model configuration, antenna effects may affect the topography of the objective function in full‐waveform inverse problems. In addition, antenna‐medium coupling has a significant impact on the medium surface reflection, whether in terms of amplitude or propagation time (which usually defines the so‐called time zero). We also showed that an effective source cannot be used for simulating near‐field radar data as the antenna‐medium coupling strongly depends on medium properties. In this respect, numerical experiments demonstrated promising perspectives for simultaneous estimates of medium permittivity and conductivity from antenna‐medium coupling.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012005
2012-02-01
2020-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlvarezY., Las‐HerasF. and PinoM.R.2007. Reconstruction of equivalent currents distribution over arbitrary three‐dimensional surfaces based on integral equation algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation55(12), 3460–3468.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChanzyA., TarussovA., JudgeA. and BonnF.1996. Soil water content determination using digital ground penetrating radar. Soil Science Society of America Journal60, 1318‐1326.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CraeyeC., GillesT. and DardenneX.2009. Efficient full‐wave characterization of arrays of antennas embedded in finite dielectric volumes. Radio Science44.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CraeyeC. and Gonzalez‐OvejeroD.2011. A review on array mutual coupling analysis. Radio Science46, 25.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GentiliG.G. and SpagnoliniU.2000. Electromagnetic inversion in monostatic ground penetrating radar: TEM horn calibration and application. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing38(4), 1936–1946.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. IlicM.M., DjordjevicM., IlicA.Z. and NotarosB.M.2009. Higher Order Hybrid FEM‐MoM Technique for Analysis of Antennas and Scatterers. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation57(5), 1452–1460.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KnightJ.H. and RaicheA.P.1982. Transient electromagnetic calculations using the Gaver‐Stehfest inverse Laplace transform method. Geophysics47, 47–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LambotS. and AndréF.2012. Full‐wave modeling of near‐field radar data to reconstruct planar layered media. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Submitted.
  9. LambotS., SlobE.C., van den BoschI., StockbroeckxB. and VancloosterM.2004. Modeling of ground‐penetrating radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing42(11), 2555–2568.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LambotS., SlobE. and VereeckenH.2007. Fast evaluation of zero‐offset Green's function for layered media with application to ground‐penetrating radar. Geophysical Research Letters34, L21405, doi:21410.21029/22007GL031459.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LambotS., WeihermüllerL., HuismanJ.A., VereeckenH., VancloosterM. and SlobE.C.2006. Analysis of air‐launched ground‐penetrating radar techniques to measure the soil surface water content. Water Resources Research42, W11403, doi:11410.11029/12006WR005097.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LedieuJ., De RidderP., De ClercqP. and DautrebandeS.1986. A method of measuring soil moisture by time domain reflectometry. Journal of Hydrology88, 319–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MelesG., GreenhalghS., van der KrukJ., GreenA. and MaurerH.2011. Taming the non‐linearity problem in GPR full‐waveform inversion for high contrast media. Journal of Applied Geophysics73(2), 174–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MinetJ., LambotS., SlobE.C. and VancloosterM.2010. Soil Surface Water Content Estimation by Full‐Waveform GPR Signal Inversion in the Presence of Thin Layers. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing48(3), 1138–1150.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MoghadasD., AndréF., VereeckenH. and LambotS.2010. Efficient loop antenna modeling for zero‐offset, off‐ground electromagnetic induction in multilayered media. Geophysics75(4), WA125–WA134.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PatriarcaC., LambotS., MahmoudzadehM.R., MinetJ. and SlobE.2011. Reconstruction of sub‐wavelength fractures and physical properties of masonry media using full‐waveform inversion of proximal penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics74(1), 26–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. PettinelliE., VannaroniG., Di PasquoB., MatteiE., Di MatteoA., De SantisA. and AnnanP.A.2007. Correlation between near‐surface electromagnetic soil parameters and early‐time GPR signals: An experimental study. Geophysics72(2), A25–A28.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RhoadesJ.D., RaatsP.A.C. and PratherR.J.1976. Effects of liquid‐phase electrical conductivity, water content, and surface conductivity on bulk soil electrical conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal40, 651–655.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SarkarT.K. and TaagholA.1999. Near‐field to near/far‐field transformation for arbitrary near‐field geometry utilizing an equivalent electric current and MoM. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation47(3), 566‐573.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SerhirM., BesnierP. and DrissiM.2010. Antenna Modeling Based on a Multiple Spherical Wave Expansion Method: Application to an Antenna Array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation58(1), 51–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SlobE.C. and FokkemaJ.2002. Coupling effects of two electric dipoles on an interface. Radio Science37(5), 1073, doi:1010.1029/2001RS2529.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SlobE., SatoM. and OlhoeftG.2010. Surface and borehole ground‐penetrating‐radar developments. Geophysics75(5), A103–A120.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SoldovieriF., LoperaO. and LambotS.2011. Combination of Advanced Inversion Techniques for an Accurate Target Localization via GPR for Demining Applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing49(1), 451–461.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WarrenC. and GiannopoulosA.2011. Creating finite‐difference timedomain models of commercial ground‐penetrating radar antennas using Taguchi's optimization method. Geophysics76(2), G37–G47.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. YelfR.2004. Where is true time‐zero? In: E.C.Slob , J.Rhebergen , and A.Yarovoy (ed). Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands. 279–282.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012005
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error