1887
Volume 11 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In two‐dimensional (2D) ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data, the reflections from detection targets in depth can be severely obscured by strong scattering generated from near‐surface non‐target structures. By using GPR as a geotechnical non‐destructive testing device, it is still a challenge to eliminate the strong scattering caused by near‐surface rebars in a tunnel lining and to image and asses the grouting condition behind the tunnel lining. This study proposes a method for the reconstruction of GPR images, termed Maxwell curl equation datuming. To eliminate the deleterious effect caused by near‐surface diffractive scattering, we have redefined the reference surface to an actual geologic/engineered interface by using Maxwell curl equation datuming methodology based on the Kirchhoff integral solution. The datuming procedure can redefine the reference surface to a deeper horizon on which GPR transmitters and receivers appear to be located. We conducted a comparison between the datuming and migration to synthetic examples and case studies are presented for a physical model and real GPR data for assessments of shield tunnel grouting in the Shanghai Metro line No.9. The results show that the datuming technique is able to eliminate the strong scattering related to near‐surface rebars in a tunnel lining and improves the quality of deeper images beneath the tunnel lining. The datuming images make it easy to identify the distribution of tunnel grouting.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012029
2012-07-01
2020-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AnnanA.P.1999. Ground penetrating radar: Survey design. Mississauga, Ontario.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BerryhillJ.R.1979. Wave equation datuming.Geophysics44, 1329–1344.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BerryhillJ.R.1984. Wave equation datuming before stack.Geophysics49, 2064–2067.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CalvertR.W., BakulinA. and JonesT.C.2004. Virtual sources, a new way to remove overburden problems.66th Annual Conference, Paris, France, Expanded Abstracts, P234.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DruzhininA.1998. Explicit Kirchhoff‐Helmholtz integrals and their accurate numerical implementation.Wave Motion28, 119–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DuJ., HuangH.W. and XieX.Y.2005. Research on the simulation examination about GPR detection of grouting material behind shield tunnel segment.Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering1, 817–821.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HanafyS.M. and SchusterG.T.2007. Target‐oriented interferometric tomography for GPR data.Geophysics72, J1–J6.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LaneJr.J.W., BuursinkM.L., HaeniF.P. and VersteegR.J.2000. Evaluation of Ground‐Penetrating Radar to Detect Free‐Phase Hydrocarbons in Fractured Rocks – Results of Numerical Modeling and Physical Experiments.Ground Water38, 929–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LarkinS.P. and LevanderA.1996. Wave‐equation datuming for improving deep crustal seismic images.Tectonophysics264, 371–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LiuL.B. and ArconeS.A.2003. Numerical simulation of the wave‐guide effect of the near‐surface thin layer on radar wave propagation.Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics8, 133–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LiuL.B., HeK., XieX.Y. and DuJ.2007. Image enhancement with wave‐equation redatuming: Application to GPR data collected at public transportation sites.Journal of Geophysics and Engineering4, 139–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McMechanG.A. and ChenH.W.1990. Implicit static corrections in prestack migration of common source data.Geophysics55, 757–760.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PradaC., KerbratE., CassereauD. and FinkM.2002. Time reversal techniques in ultrasonic nondestructive testing of scattering media.Inverse Problems18, 1761–1773.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ReshefM.1991. Depth migration from irregular surfaces with depth extrapolation methods.Geophysics56, 119–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. RickettJ. and ClaerboutJ.1999. Acoustic daylight imaging via spectral factorization: Helioseismology and reservoir monitoring.The Leading Edge18, 957–960.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SchusterG.T., YuJ., ShengJ. and RickettJ.2004. Interferometric/daylight seismic imaging.Geophysical Journal International157, 838–852.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ScottP.F. and HelmbergerD.1983. Application of the Kirchhoff‐Helmholtz integral problems in seismology.Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society72, 237–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SigginsA.F. and WhiteleyR. J.2000. Laboratory simulation of high‐frequency GPR responses of damaged tunnel lining.Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 805–811, SPIE.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SniederR., GretA., DoumaH. and ScalesJ.2002. Coda wave interferometry for estimating nonlinear behavior in seismic velocity.Science295, 2253–2255.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ThorsosE.I.1988. The validity of the Kirchhoff approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America83, 78–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ToppG.C., ZegelinS. and WhiteI.1999. Impacts of the Real and Imaginary Components of Relative Permittivity on Time Domain Reflectometry Measurements in Soils.Soil Science Society of America Journal64, 1244–1252.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. WapenaarC.P.A., ThorbeckeJ. and DraganovD.2004. Relation between reflection and transmission responses of 3‐D inhomogeneous media.Geophysical Journal International156, 179–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. XieX.Y., LiuY.J., HuangH.W., DuJ., ZhangF.S. and LiuL.B.2007. Evaluation of grout behind the lining of shield tunnels using ground‐penetrating radar in the Shanghai Metro Line.Journal of Geophysics and Engineering4, 253–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. XueY.2010. Least squares datuming and surface waves prediction with interferometry.PhD thesis. The University of Utah.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ZhangF.H., XieX.Y. and HuangH.W.2010. Application of ground penetrating radar in grouting evaluation for shield tunnel construction.Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology25, 99–107.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012029
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2012029
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error