Tomographic GPR imaging using a linear inversion algorithm informed by FDTD modelling: a numerical case study of buried utility pipes monitoring

References

1. BalanisC.A.1989. Advanced Engineering ElectroMagnetics. John Wiley & Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BergmannT., RobertssonJ.O.A. and HolligerK.1998. Finite‐difference modeling of electromagnetic wave propagation in dispersive and attenuating media. Geophysics63(3), 856–867.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BerteroM. and BoccacciP.2002. Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging. The Institute of Physics Publishing, London.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CassidyN.J.2001. The application of mathematical modelling in the interpretation of near‐surface archaeological ground‐penetrating radar. PhD thesis, Keele University.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CassidyN.J.2007. A review of practical numerical modelling methods for the advanced interpretation of ground‐penetrating radar in near‐surface environments. Near Surface Geophysics5(1), 5–21.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CatapanoI., CroccoL., PersicoR., PieracciniM., SoldovieriF.2006. Linear and Nonlinear Microwave Tomography Approaches for Subsurface Prospecting: Validation on Real Data. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters5, 49–53.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ClayC.S.1990. Elementary Exploration Seismology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ConyersL.B. and GoodmanD.1997. Ground‐penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists. AltaMira Press, Sage Publications, California, U.S.A.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CroccoL., PriscoG.SoldovieriF. and CassidyN.J.2009. Early‐stage leaking pipes GPR monitoring via microwave tomographic inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics67(4), 270–277.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CroccoL. and SoldovieriF.2003. GPR prospecting in a layered medium via microwave tomography. Annals of Geophysics46(3), 559–572.
    [Google Scholar]
11. CroccoL., SoldovieriF., MillingtonT. and CassidyN.J.2010. Bistatic tomographic GPR imaging for incipient pipeline leakage evaluation. Progress In Electromagnetics Research101, 307–321.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GiannopoulosA.2008. An improved new implementation of complex frequency shifted PML for the FDTD method. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation56(9), 2995–3000.
    [Google Scholar]
13. OyLeuangthong
    GloaguenE., MarcotteD. and ChouteauM.2004. A Non‐linear GPR Tomographic Inversion Algorithm Based on Iterated Cokriging and Conditional Simulations. In: Geostatics Banff2004, Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics series, (eds OyLeuangthong and C.V.Deutsch ), pp. 409–418. Springer Netherlands2005
    [Google Scholar]
14. JolH.M.1995. Ground‐Penetrating Radar Antennae Frequencies and Transmitter Powers Compared for Penetration Depth, Resolution and Reflection Continuity. Geophysical Prospecting43(5), 693–709.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LambotS., SlobE.C., StockbroeckxB., SheersB. and VancloosterM.2004. Estimating soil dielectric properties from monostatic GPR signal inversion in the frequency domain. Water Resources Research40(W04205).
    [Google Scholar]
16. MeinckeP.2001. Linear GPR inversion for lossy soil and a planar air‐soil interface. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing39(12), 2713–2721.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MelesG.A., van der KrukJ., GreenhalghS.A., ErnstJ.R., MaurerH. and GreenA.G.2010. A New Vector Waveform Inversion Algorithm for Simultaneous Updating of Conductivity and Permittivity Parameters From Combination Crosshole/Borehole‐to‐Surface GPR Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing48(9), 3391–3407.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MillingtonT.M. and CassidyN.J.2010. Optimising GPR modelling: A practical, multi‐threaded approach to 3D FDTD numerical modelling. Computers & Geosciences36(9), 1135–1144.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MillingtonT.M., NuzzoL., CassidyN.J. and PringleJ.K.2009. Three‐dimensional modelling and inversion of complex, near‐surface GPR targets. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on advanced Ground Penetrating Radar.
    [Google Scholar]
20. OrlandoL. and BernabiniM.1998. Frequency analysis for Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR): waves in the air and in the ground. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR '98), USA, pp. 69–73.
    [Google Scholar]
21. PersicoR. and SoldovieriF.2006. Microwave tomography approach for a differential configuration in GPR prospecting. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation54(11), 3541–3548.
    [Google Scholar]
22. PettinelliE., Di MatteoA., MatteiE., CroccoL., SoldovieriF., RedmanJ.D. and AnnanA.P.2009. GPR Response From Buried Pipes: Measurement on Field Site and Tomographic Reconstructions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing47(8), 2639–2645.
    [Google Scholar]
23. SoldovieriF., HugenschmidtJ., PersicoR. and LeoneG.2007. A linear inverse scattering algorithm for realistic GPR applications. Near Surface Geophysics5(1), 29–41.
    [Google Scholar]
24. TafloveA. and HagnessS.C.2005. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite‐difference Time‐domain Method. 3rd edn, Artech House.
    [Google Scholar]
25. UK Highways Agency
    UK Highways Agency . Design Manual for Roads and Bridges: Volume 7 – Pavement Design and Maintenance. 2001. London, The Stationary Office Ltd. Ref Type: Generic
    [Google Scholar]
26. Waterwise, The Facts, http://www.waterwise.org.uk/reducing_water_wast‐age_in_the_uk/the_facts/the_facts_about_saving_water.html, accessed 17/11/2010.
27. YeeK.S.1966. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation14, 302–307.
    [Google Scholar]