1887
Volume 12 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The technique of surface nuclear magnetic resonance (surface‐NMR) provides information on porosity and hydraulic conductivity that is highly valuable in a hydrogeological context. However, the applicability of surface‐NMR is often limited due to a bad signal‐to‐noise ratio. In this paper we provide a detailed insight into the technique of harmonic noise cancellation based on remote references to improve the signal‐to‐noise ratio. We give numerous synthetic examples to study the influence of various parameters such as optimal filter length for time‐ domain approaches or the necessary record length for frequency‐domain approaches, all of which evaluated for different types of noise conditions. We show that the frequency‐domain approach is superior to time‐domain approaches. We demonstrate that the parameter settings in the frequency domain and the decision whether or not to use separated noise measurement depend on the actual noise properties, i.e., frequency content or stability with time. We underline our results using two field examples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2013033
2013-04-01
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AsterR., BorchersB. and ThurberC.2005. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. Elsevier Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ButtkusB.2000. Spectral Analysis and Filter Theory in Applied Geophysics. Springer‐Verlag Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ChaveA.D., ThomsonD.J. and AnderM.E.1987. On the Robust Estimation of Power Spectra, Coherences, and Transfer Functions. Journal of Geophysical Research92(B1), 633–648.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CostabelS. and Müller‐PetkeM.2012. MRS noise investigations with focus on optimizing the measurement setup in the field. Proceedings of Magnetic Resonance in the Subsurface 2012. 5th International Workshop on Magnetic Resonance, Hannover, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CostabelS. and Müller‐PetkeM.2013. Despiking of magnetic resonance signals in time and wavelet domain. Near Surface Geophysics12(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DalgaardE., AukenE. and LarsenJ.2012. Adaptive noise cancelling of multichannel magnetic resonance sounding signals. Geophysical Journal International191(1), 88–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GambleT.D., GoubauW.M. and ClarkeJ.1979a. Magnetotellurics with a remote magnetic reference. Geophysics44(1), P53–P68.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GambleT.D., GoubauW.M. and ClarkeJ.1979b. Error analysis for remote reference magnetotellurics. Geophysics44(5), P959–P968.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GoubauW.M., MaxtonP.M., KochR.H. and ClarkeJ.1984. Noise correlation lengths in remote reference magnetotellurics. Geophysics49(4), P433–P438.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GüntherT. and Müller‐PetkeM.2012. Hydraulic properties at the North Sea island of Borkum derived from joint inversion of magnetic resonance and electrical resistivity soundings. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences16, 3279–3291.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HertrichM., GreenA.G., BraunM. and YaramanciU.2009. High‐resolution surface‐NMR tomography of shallow aquifers based on multi‐off set measurements. Geophysics74(6), G47–G59.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. JiangC., LinJ., DuanQ., SunS. and TianB.2011. Statistical stacking and adaptive notch filter to remove high‐level electromagnetic noise from MRS measurements. Near Surface Geophysics9, 459–468.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lehmann‐HornJ.A., HertrichM., GreenhalghS.A. and GreenA.G.2011. Three‐Dimensional Magnetic Field and NMR Sensitivity Computations Incorporating Conductivity Anomalies and Variable‐Surface Topography. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing49, 3878–3891.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Müller‐PetkeM. and YaramanciU.2010a. QT inversion ‐ Comprehensive use of the complete surface NMR data set. Geophysics75(4), WA199–WA209.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Müller‐PetkeM. and YaramanciU.2010b. Improving the Signal‐to‐noise Ratio of Surface‐NMR Measurements by Reference Channel Based Noise Cancellation. Proceedings of Near Surface 2010 – 16th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. NeyerF.2010. Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Processing of Full Time Series, Multichannel Surface NMR Signals. M.Sc thesis, ETH Zurich, Department of Earth Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. RadicT.2006. Improving the Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio of Surface NMR Data Due to the Remote Reference Technique. 12th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SpiesB.R.1988. Local noise prediction filtering for central induction transient electromagnetic sounding. Geophysics53(8), 1068–1079.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TrushkinD., ShushakovO. and LegchenkoA.1994. The potential of a noise‐reducing antenna for surface NMR groundwater surveys in the earth’s magnetic field. Geophysical Prospecting42(8), 855–862.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WalshD.O.2008. Multi‐channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations. Journal of Applied Geophysics66(3–4), 140–150, Resonance Sounding – A Reality in Applied Hydrogeophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2013033
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2013033
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error