1887
Volume 12 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Surface and laboratory Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) measurements combined with transient electromagnetic (TEM) data are powerful tools for subsurface water detection. Surface NMR (sNMR) and TEM soundings, laboratory NMR, complex resistivity, and X‐Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis were all conducted to characterise the distribution of water within Sherman Crater on Mt. Baker, WA. Clay rich rocks, particularly if water saturated, can weaken volcanoes, thereby increasing the potential for catastrophic sector collapses that can lead to far‐travelled, destructive debris flows. Detecting the presence and volume of shallow groundwater is critical for evaluating these landslide hazards. The TEM data identified a low resistivity layer (<10 ohm‐m), under 60 m of glacial ice related to water saturated clays. The TEM struggles to resolve the presence or absence of a plausible thin layer of bulk liquid water on top of the clay. The sNMR measurements did not produce any observable signal, indicating the lack of substantial accumulated bulk water below the ice. Laboratory analysis on a sample from the crater wall that likely represented the clays beneath the ice confirmed that the controlling factor for the lack of sNMR signal was the fine‐grained nature of the media. The laboratory measurements further indicated that small pores in clays detected by the XRD contain as much as 50% water, establishing an upper bound on the water content in the clay layer. Forward modelling of geologic scenarios revealed that bulk water layers as thin as ½ m between the ice and clay layer would have been detectable using sNMR. The instrumentation conditions which would allow for sNMR detection of the clay layer are investigated. Using current instrumentation the combined analysis of the TEM and sNMR data allow for valuable characterisation of the groundwater system in the crater. The sNMR is able to reduce the uncertainty of the TEM in regards to the presence of a bulk water layer, a valuable piece of information in hazard assessment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2014009
2014-01-01
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbragamA.1961The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism. Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AizawaK.2008. Classification of self‐potential anomalies on volcanoes and possible interpretations for their subsurface structure. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research175, 253–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BehroozmandA.A., AukenE., FiandacaG. and ChristiansenA.V.2012. Improvement in mrs parameter estimation by joint and laterally constrained inversion of mrs and tem data. Geophysics77, WB191–WB200.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BehroozmandA.A., DalgaardE., ChristiansenA.V. and AukenE.2013. A comprehensive study of parameter determination in a joint MRS and TEM data analysis scheme. Near Surface Geophysics11, 557–567.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BoucherM., FavreauG., VouillamozJ.M., NazoumouY. and LegchenkoA.2009. Estimating specific yield and transmissivity with magnetic resonance sounding in an unconfined sandstone aquifer (Niger). Hydrogeology Journal17, 1805–1815.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CaldwellG., PearsonC.F. and ZayadiH.1986. Resistivity of rocks in geothermal systems; a laboratory study. Proceedings of the New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, 227–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CarrH.Y. and PurcellE.M.1954. Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments. Physical Review94, 630–638.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChristiansenA.V. and AukenE.2010. A global measure for Depth of Investigation in EM and DC Modeling. ASEG Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
  9. ChristiansenA.V., AukenE. and ViezzoliA.2011. Quanti_ation of modeling errors in airborne TEM caused by inaccurate system description. Geophysics76, F43–F52.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ClarkD.A.1997. Magnetic petrophysics and magnetic petrology: aids to geological interpretation of magnetic surveys. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics17, 83–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CoatesG.R., XiaoL. and PrammerM.G.1999. NMR Logging: Principles and Applications. Haliburton Energy Services.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ConstableS., ParkerR. and ConstableC.1987. Occams inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics52, 289–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DanielsenJ.E., AukenE., JørgensenF., SøndergaardV. and SørensenK.I.2003. The application of the transient electromagnetic method in hydrogeophysical surveys. Journal of Applied Geophysics53, 181–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DlugoschR., Müller‐PetkeM., GüntherT., CostabelS. and YaramanciU.2011. As4 sessment of the potential of a new generation of surface nuclear magnetic resonance instruments. Near Surface Geophysics9, 169–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FarrarT.C. and BeckerE.D.1971. Pulse and Fourier Transform NMR: Introduction to Theory and Methods. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FinizolaA., RevilA., RizzoE., PiscitelliS., RicciT., MorinJ.et al. 2006. Hydrogeologic insights at Stromboli volcano (Italy) from geo‐electrical, temperature, and CO2 soil degassing investigations. Geophysical Research Letters33. doi:10.1029/2006GL026842.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FinnC.A. and Descsz‐PanM.2011. Helicopter magnetic and electromagnetic surveys at Mounts Adams, Baker and Rainier, Washington: Implications for debris flow hazards and volcano hydrology. Society of Exploration Geophysicists Global Meeting Abstracts, 15, 3 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. FinnC.A., Descsz‐PanM. and BedrosianP.2012. Helicopter electromagnetic data map ice thickness at Mount Adams and Mount Baker, Washington. Journal of Glaciology58, 1133–1143.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. FinnC.A., Descsz‐PanM., AndersonE.D. and JohnD.A.2007a. Three‐dimensional geophysical mapping of rock alteration and water content at Mount Adams, Washington: Implications for lahar hazards. Journal of Geophysical Research112.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. FinnC.A., Descsz‐PanM., HortonR., BreitG. and JohnD.A.2007b. Airborne Magnetic and Electromagnetic Data map Rock Alteration and Water Content at Mount Adams, Mount Baker and Mount Rainier, Washington: Implications for Lahar Hazards and Hydrothermal Systems: Eos Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 88, (Fall Meeting Supplement), Abstract NS34A–05.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. FinnC.A., SissonT.W. and Descsz‐PanM.2001. Aerogeophysical measurements of collapse‐prone hydrothermally altered zones at Mount Rainier Volcano, Washington. Nature409, 600–603.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. FittermanD. and LabsonV.2005. Electromagnetic Induction Methods for Environmental Problems, in Near‐Surface Geophysics: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Investigations in Geophysics, 301–356.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. GardnerC.1995. Potential Volcanic Hazards from Future Activity of Mount Baker, Washington: USGS Open‐File Report 95‐498.
  24. Geofysiksamarbejdet
    Geofysiksamarbejdet . 2001. Getting Started With Sitem and Semdi. Technical Report, Aarhus University, Aarhus.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Geofysiksamarbejdet
    Geofysiksamarbejdet . 2002a. Test og sammenligning af transient elektromagnetiske instrumenter i Danmark. Technical Report, Aarhus University, Aarhus. (in Danish)
  26. Geofysiksamarbejdet
    Geofysiksamarbejdet . 2002b. Vejledning i kalibrering af Geonics Protem 47 måleinstrument. Technical Report, Aarhus University, Aarhus. (in Danish)
  27. GevI., GoldmanM., RabinovichB., RabinovichM. and IssarA.1996. Detection of the water level in fractured phreatic aquifers using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) geophysical measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics34, 277–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. GirardJ.F., LegchenkoA., BoucherM. and BaltassatJ.M.2008. Numerical study of the variations of magnetic resonance signals caused by surface slope. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 94–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. GrunewaldE. and KnightR.2011a. A laboratory study of NMR relaxation times in unconsolidated heterogeneous sediments. Geophysics76, G73–G83.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. GrunewaldE. and KnightR.2011b. The effect of pore size and magnetic susceptibility on the surface NMR relaxation parameter T2* . Near Surface Geophysics9, 169–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. HertrichM., BraunM. and YaramanciU.2005. Magnetic resonance soundings with separated transmitter and receiver loop. Near Surface Geophysics3, 131–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. HildrethW., FiersteinJ.E. and LanphereM.A.2003. Eruptive history and geochronology of the Mount Baker volcanic field, Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin115, 729–764.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. IronsT., HobzaC.M., SteeleG.V., AbrahamJ.D. and WoodwardJ.C.2012a. Quantification of aquifer properties with surface nuclear magnetic resonance in the Platte River valley, central Nebraska, using a novel inversion method. Scientific Investigations Report2012–5189, U.S. Geological Survey.
  34. IronsT., KassM.A. and Others. 2012b. Lemma v1: https://lemmasoftware.org.
  35. IronsT., LiY. and McKennaJ.R.2010. Frequency domain surface nuclear magnetic resonance forward modeling on an adaptive octree mesh. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 29, 3935–3939.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. IversonR.M. and ReidM.E.1992. Gravity‐driven groundwater ow and slope failure potential, 1, Elastic effective‐stress model. Water Resource Research18, 925–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. JohnD.A., SissonT.W., BreitG.N., RyeR.O. and VallanceJ.W.2008. Characteristics, extent and origin of hydrothermal alteration at Mount Rainier Volcano, Cascades Arc, USA: Implications for debris‐ow hazards and mineral deposits. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research175, 289–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. KagiyamaT., UtadaH. and YamamotoY.1999. Magma ascent beneath Unzen Volcano, SW Japan, deduced from the electrical resistivity structure. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research89, 35–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. KeatingK. and KnightR.2007. A Laboratory Study to Determine the Effects of Iron Oxides on Proton NMR Measurements. Geophysics71, E27.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. KeatingK. and KnightR.2008. A laboratory study of the effct of magnetite on NMR relaxation rates. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 188–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. KeatingK. and KnightR.2010. A laboratory study of the effect of Fe(II) bearing minerals on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation measurements. Geophysics75.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. KellerG.V.1987. Rock and mineral properties. Investigations in Geophysics3, 13–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. KenyonW.E.1997. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging. The Log Analyst38, 21–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. KleinbergR.L., KenyonW.E. and MitraP.P.1994. Mechanism of NMR Relaxation of Fluids in Rock. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A, 108, 206‐214.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. KnightR., GrunewaldE., IronsT., DlubacK., SongY., BachmanH.N.et al. 2012. Field experiment provides ground truth for surface nuclear magnetic resonance measurement. Gephysical Research Letters39.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.‐M., BeauceA. and BernardJ.2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 21–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. LegchenkoA., BaltassatJ.‐M., BobachevA., MartinC., RobainH. and VouillamozJ.‐M.2004. Magnetic resonance sounding applied to aquifer characterization. Ground Water42, 363–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. LegchenkoA., DescloitresM., VincentC., GuyardH., GaramboisS., ChalikakisK.et al. 2011. Three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for groundwater. New Journal of Physics13, 25022.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. LegchenkoA. and ShushakovO.1998. Inversion of surface NMR data. Geophysics63, 75–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Legchenko, A., VouillamozJ.‐M. and RoyJ.2010. Application of the magnetic resonance sounding method to the investigation of aquifers in the presence of magnetic materials. Geophysics75, L91–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Lehmann‐HornJ., HertrichM., GreenhalghS. and GreenA.2011a. Three‐dimensional magnetic field and nmr sensitivity computations incorporating conductivity anomalies and variable‐surface topography. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing49, 3878–3891.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lehmann‐HornJ., WalbreckerJ., HertrichM., LangstonG., McClymontA. and GreenA.2011b. Imaging groundwater beneath a rugged proglacial moraine. Geophysics76, B165–B172.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McNeillJ. and LabsonV.F.1988, Geological mapping using VLF radio fields: Presented at the Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Müller‐PetkeM. and YaramanciU.2010. QT inversion – Comprehensive use of the complete surface NMR data set. Geophysics75, WA199–WA209.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. NabighianM. and MacnaeJ.1991. Time Domain Electromagnetic Prospecting Methods. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Investigations in Geophysics, 6, 427–520.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. NielsenM.R., HagensenT.F., ChalikakisK. and LegchenkoA.2011. Comparison of transmissivities from MRS and pumping tests in Denmark. Near Surface Geophysics9(2), 211–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. PallattN. and ThornlyD.1990. The role of bound water and capillary water in the evaluation of porosity in reservoir rocks. 1st Society of Core Analysis European Coe Analysis Symposium, 223–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. ParkM.2011. Glacial and geothermal dynamics in Sherman Crater, Mount Baker, Washington. PhD Thesis, Western Washington University, Bellingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Radic′T.2005. Zeitreihenauswertung von NMR Messungen im Erdmagnetfeld: Protokoll n”uber das 21. Kolloquium “Elektromagnetische Tiefenforschung’.
  60. ReidM.E.2004. Massive collapse of volcano edifices triggered by hydrothermal pressurization. Geology32, 373–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. ReidM.E. and IversonR.M.1992. Gravity‐driven groundwater ow and slope failure potential: 2. Effects of slope morphology, material properties, and hydraulic heterogeneity. Water Resource Research28, 939–950.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. ReynoldsJ.M.2011. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. RobertsJ.J. and LinW.1997. Electrical properties of partially saturated Topopah Spring tuff: Water distribution as a function of saturation. Water Resources Journal33, 577–587.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. SchirovM., LegchenkoA. and CreerG.1991. New direct non‐invasive ground water detection technology for Australia. Exploration Geophysics22, 333–338.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. ScottK.M.2003. The Sherman Crater eruptive period at Mount Baker, North Cascades – A.D. 1843 to present – implications for reservoirs at the base of the volcano. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 305, 321.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. SemenovA.G.1987. NMR hydroscope for water prospecting. Expanded Abstracts, 66–67.
  67. ShushakovO. and FomenkoV.2004. Surface‐NMR relaxation and echo of aquifers in geomagnetic field. Applied Magnetic Resonance25, 599–610.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. StraleyC., RoosiniD. and VinegarH.1997. Core analysis by low‐field NMR. Log Analyst35, 599–610.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. TrushkinD.V., ShushakovO. and LegchenkoA.1994. The potential of a noise‐reducing antenna for surface NMR groundwater surveys in the earth’s magnetic field. Geophysical Prospecting42, 855–862.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. VallanceJ.W. and ScottK.M.1997. The Osceola Mudow from Mount Rainier: Sedi6 entology and hazard implications of a huge clay‐rich debris ow. Geological Society of America Bulletin109, 143–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. VouillamozJ.‐M., LegchenkoA. and NandagiriL.2011. Characterizing aquifers when using magnetic resonance sounding in a heterogeneous geomagnetic field. Near Surface Geophysics9, 135–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. WalbreckerJ.O., HertrichM. and GreenA.G.2009. Accounting for relaxation processes during the pulse in surface NMR data. Geophysics74, G27–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. WalshD.2008. Multi‐channel surface NMR instrumentation and software for 1D/2D groundwater investigations. Journal of Applied Geophysics66, 140–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. WalshD., GrunewaldE., TurnerP., HinnellA. and FerreP.2011. Practical limitations and applications of short dead time surface NMR. Near Surface Geophysics9, 103–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. WeichmanP.B., LavelyE.M. and RitzwollerM.H.2000. Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonance with applications to geophysical imaging problems. Physical Review E62, 1290–1312.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. YaramanciU., LangeG. and KnodelK.1999. Surface NMR within a Geophysical Study of an Aquifer at Haldensleben Germany. Geophysical Prospecting47, 923–943.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2014009
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2014009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error