1887
Volume 13 Number 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

Katarínka (St. Catherine) is the ruin of an abandoned Franciscan monastery from the early 17th century located in the western Small Carpathians in Slovakia. Historical sources and paintings suggest that, beside the remains of the monastery that are still visible, a circle of eight chapels, a pilgrim’s hospice, a cemetery, and garden terraces originally surrounded the main building of the monastery. From 2009 to 2012, geophysical campaigns were performed to find evidences and positions of remains of these buildings of the monastery campus. An initial magnetic overview survey revealed multiple local accumulations of disordered dipole anomalies. Since these accumulations did not allow a structural interpretation, ground penetrating radar measurements were conducted. The ground penetrating radar results clearly showed wall structures beneath almost all magnetic anomaly accumulations. In between the remains of the monastery main building, ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography were performed at different areas that were difficult to access because of a strong cover of vegetation and steep topography.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015027
2015-03-01
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BreinerS.1999. Applications Manual for Portable Magnetometers. Geometrics, San Jose, CA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ClarkA.J.1986. Archaeological geophysics in Britain. Geophysics51(7), 1404–1413.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DoetschJ., LindeN., PessognelliM., GreenA.G. and GüntherT.2012. Constraining 3‐D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization.Journal of Applied Geophysics78, 68–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ErkulE., KleinC., RabbelW. and StümpelH.2007. Integrated prospection methods – multisensory geophysical prospection of the archaeological site of Metaponte (Gulf of Tarent, Italy). In: Geophysik und Ausgrabung – Einsatz und Auswertung zerstörungsfreier Prospektion in der Archäologie ( Hrsg. M.Posselt , B.Zickgraf , and C.Dobiat ), pp. 11–16. Rahden/Westf.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ErkulE., StümpelH. and WunderlichT.2011. Geophysical investigation of the Hittite city of Sarissa. 9th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Izmir, Turkey, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HercegP.2009. Doterajšie Skúsenosti Pri Obnove Zrúcaniny Kláštora Katarínka. ISBN: 978‐80‐969551‐6‐9 (in Slovak).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HillI., GrosseyT. and LeechC.2004. High‐resolution multisensory geophysical surveys for near‐surface applications can be rapid and cost‐effective.The Leading Edge23(7), 684–688.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KeayS., GraemeE. and HayS.2009. The role of integrated geophysical survey methods in the assessment of archaeological landscapes: the case of Portus.Archaeological Prospection16(3), 154–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44 (1), 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. NeubauerW.2002. Magnetische Prospektion in der Archäologie. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NiewöhnerP., RabbelW., StümpelH., PaštekaR. and BarisS.2010. Eine neu entdeckte byzantinische Kirche in Iznik/Nikaia.Istanbuler Mitteilungen60, 475–491.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PanisovaJ., FraštiaM., WunderlichT., PaštekaR. and KušnirákD.2013. Microgravity and ground‐penetrating radar investigations of subsurface features at the St. Catherineșs Monastery, Slovakia.Archaeological Prospection20, 163–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PaštekaR. and ZahorecP.2000. Interpretation of microgravimetrical anomalies in the region of the former church of St. Catherine, Dechtice.Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy30(4), 373–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PringleJ.K., JervisJ.R. and TuckwellG.T.2009. Comparison of time‐lapse GPR and resistivity over simulated clandestine graves. 15th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Dublin, Ireland, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. RabbelW., ErkulE., StümpelH., WunderlichT., PaštekaR., PapčoJ. et al. 2014. Discovery of a Byzantine church in Iznik/Nicaea, Turkey: an educational case history of geophysical prospecting with combined methods in urban areas.Archaeological Prospection (in press).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. RabbelW. and Müller‐KarpeA.2004. Trecker und Sensoren–Geophysik erforscht antike.
  17. RabbelW., StümpelH. and WölzS.2004. Archaeological prospecting with magnetic and shear‐wave surveys at the ancient city of Miletos (western Turkey).The Leading Edge23, 690–703.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ŠimoncicJ.1989. Kostol a kláštor sv. Kataríny v Dechticiach.Vlastivedný Časopis4, 161–166 (in Slovak).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WilkenD., WunderlichT., FeldensP. and HeinrichC.2012. Application of 2D Fourier filtering for elimination of stripe noise in side‐scan sonar mosaics.Geo‐Marine Letters32(4), 337–347.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015027
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error