1887
Volume 14 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The assessment of cultural heritage requires high‐resolution and non‐destructive methodologies. Ground‐penetrating radar is widely applied in the inspection of historical buildings. However, some structures with curved surfaces make the radar data acquisition process difficult and consequently the following data interpretation. This paper describes a case study concerning a circular and buried Greek monument. This monument is a magnificent tomb buried with irregular stones. However, its structure and the internal stones arrangement are unknown. Therefore, a radar survey was carried out to achieve two main objectives: (i) identification of hidden elements and arrangement of the stones and (ii) detection of specific zones where further restoration and maintenance should be recommended. The methodology for the radar data acquisition involves the use of a laser scan in order to define accurately each radar line, covering all the internal surface of the tomb. Radar data processing was developed by converting Cartesian coordinates into polar coordinates. This procedure allows defining better the internal anomalies, improving the radar data interpretation. The main results of the survey were three: (i) the presence of a hidden target buried in the corridor access to the tomb; (ii) the description of the internal structure of the walls of the tomb, defining the stones arrangement and the position and depth to the keystone; and (iii) the existence of delimited zones where the signal is highly attenuated, probably due to a high salt content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015030
2018-12-18
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AriasP., ArmestoJ., Di‐CapuaD., Gonzalez‐DrigoR., LorenzoH. and Perez‐GraciaV.2007. Digital photogrammetry, GPR and computational analysis of structural damages in a mediaeval bridge. Engineering Failure Analysis14, 1444–1457.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CaliaA., Lettierim., LeucciG., MateraL., PersicoR. and Sileom.2007. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 4162–4169.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CampJ.M.2004. The Archaeology of Athens. Yale University Press, London, U.K.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ConyersL. and GoodmanD.1997. Ground‐Penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists, pp. 232. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ConyersL. and LeckebuschJ.2010. Geophysical archaeology research agendas for the future: some ground‐penetrating radar examples. Archaeological Prospection17, 117–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FaizeA. and DriouachA.2012. The use of ground penetrating radar for the detection and study of a buried marble and in situ location of possible cracks. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications2(4), 1036–1039.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Geophysical Geometry Laboratory
    Geophysical Geometry Laboratory . 2014. GPR‐SLICE V7.0 Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging Software User’s Manual, CA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hertrichm., Braunm. and YaramanciU.2005, Magnetic resonance soundings with separated transmitter and receiver loops. Near Surface Geophysics3, 141–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HrnskaJ. and FuchsG.1999. GPR prospection in ancient Ephesos. Journal of Applied Geophysics41, 293–312
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LeucciG., CataldoR. and De NunzioG.2007. Assessment of fractures in some columns inside the crypt of the Cattedrale di Otranto using integrated geophysical methods. Journal of Archaeological Science34, 222–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., SerenS. and MelicharP.2002. Georadar in the roman civil town carnuntum, austria: an approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Perez‐GraciaV., CanasJ.A., PujadesL.G., ClapesJ., CasellesO., GarcíaF. et al. 2000. GPR survey to confirm the location of ancient structures under the Valencian Cathedral (Spain). Journal of Applied Geophysics43, 167–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Perez‐GraciaV., Di CapuaD., CasellesO., RialF., LorenzoH., González‐DrigoR. et al. 2011. Characterization of a Romanesque Bridge in Galicia (Spain). International Journal of Architectural Heritage5(3), 251–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pérez‐GraciaV., GarcíaF., PujadesL.G., González‐DrigoR. and Di CapuaD.2008. GPR survey to study the restoration of a Roman monument. Journal of Cultural Heritage9, 89–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Perez‐GraciaV., González‐DrigoR. and SalaR.2012. Ground‐penetrating radar resolution in cultural heritage applications. Near Surface Geophysics10, 77–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. RainerJ.H.1982. Effect of Vibrations on Historic Buildings: An Overview. Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology14(1), 2–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Santos‐AssunçaoS.2014. Ground Penetrating Radar Applications in Seismic Zonation: Assessment and Evaluation. PhD thesis, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona‐Tech, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Santos‐AssunçaoS., Perez‐GraciaV., CasellesO., ClapesJ. and SalinasV.2014. Assessment of complex masonry structures with GPR compared to other non‐destructive testing studies. Remote Sensing6, 8220–8237.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sollam., LorenzoH., RialF.I. and NovoA.2011. GPR evaluation of the Roman masonry arch bridge of Lugo (Spain). NDT&E International44, 8–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TrinksI., JohanssonB., GustafssonJ., EmilssonJ., FriborgJ., GustafssonC. et al. 2010. Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating Radar Array system. Archaeological Prospection17(3), 175–186.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015030
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015030
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error