1887
Volume 13 Number 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

In this paper, we present a case study conducted in the archaeological park of Egnazia (Apulia, Southern Italy) based on the integrated use of two different ground‐penetrating radar systems plus a magnetometer. The surveys were carried out using a pulsed ground‐penetrating radar system, a prototypal reconfigurable stepped frequency ground‐penetrating radar and a high‐resolution magnetometer. The most important anomalies identified are ascribable to the presence of a massive building structure mainly consisting of masonry, probably dating from the Roman age. Emphasis is on the integration of the results, which has made it possible to produce enhanced images. In particular, two different approaches based on (i) algebraic and (ii) RGB combinations of the data gathered with the three sensors are illustrated and discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015042
2015-07-01
2019-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AgapiouA., HadjimitsisD.G., SarrisA., GeorgopoulosA. and AlexakisD.D.2013. Optimum temporal and spectral window for monitoring crop marks over archaeological remains in the Mediterranean region. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 1479–1492.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AndreassiG., CocchieroA. and MarucaA.2002. Egnazia. Dalla terra al mare.Edipuglia.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BianchiV.1998. L’area archeologica di Egnazia. In: AA. VV. Fasano, Natura e Cultura, pp. 51–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CaggianiM.C., CiminaleM., GalloD., NovielloM. and SalveminiF.2012. Non destructive archaeology; the archaeological park of Egnazia (Southern Italy) study case. Journal of Archaeological Science39, 67–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CaldaraM., CiminaleM., De SantisV. and NovielloM.2014. A multi‐disciplinary approach to reveal and interpret ‘missing’ archaeological features at the Masseria Pantano site in Apulia (Southern Italy). Archaeological Prospection21, 301–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CaoD., YinX., WuG. and ZhaoX.2013. Impedance joint inversion of borehole and surface seismic data. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering10, 045003.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CardarelliE., FischangerF. and PiroS.2008. Integrated geophysical survey to detect buried structures for archaeological prospecting. A case‐history at Sabine Necropolis (Rome, Italy). Near Surface Geophysics6, 15–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CataldoR., De DonnoA., De NunzioG., LeucciG., NuzzoL. and SivieroS.2005. Integrated methods for analysis of deterioration of cultural heritage: the Crypt of “Cattedrale di Otranto”. Journal of Cultural Heritage6(1), 29–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CavalliR.M., ColosiF., PalomboA., PignattiS. and PoscolieriM.2007. Remote hyperspectral imagery as a support to archaeological prospection. Journal of Cultural Heritage8, 272–283.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CiminaleM. and GalloD.2008. High‐resolution magnetic survey in a quasi‐urban environment. Near Surface Geophysics6, 97–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CiminaleM., GalloD., LasaponaraR. and MasiniN.2009. A multiscale approach for reconstructing archaeological landscapes: applications in Northern Apulia (Italy). Archaeological Prospection16, 143–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. CiminaleM. and LoddoM.2001. Aspects of magnetic data processing. Archaeological Prospection8, 239–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DempsterA.P.1968. A generalization of Bayesian inference (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B30(2), 205–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eder‐HinterleitnerA., NeubauerW. and MelicharP.1996. Restoring magnetic anomalies. Archaeological Prospection3, 185–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GoodmanD., PiroS., NishimuraY., PattersonH. and GaffneyV.2004. Discovery of a 1st Century AD Roman Amphitheater and Other Structures at the Forum Novum by GPR. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics9(1), 35–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GoodmanD. and PiroS. (eds). 2013. GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology.Springer‐Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GuanT. and FengB.2004. Rough fuzzy integrals for information fusion and classification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science3066, 362–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KhaleghiB., KhamisA., KarrayF.O. and RazaviS.N.2013. Multisensor data fusion: a review of the state‐of‐the‐art. Information Fusion14, 28–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KvammeK.L.2006. Integrating multidimensional geophysical data. Archaeological Prospection13, 57–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LasaponaraR. and MasiniN.2011. Satellite remote sensing in archaeology: past, present and future perspectives. Journal of Archaeological Science38, 1995–2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LinfordN., LinfordP., MartineL. and PayneA.2010. Stepped frequency ground‐penetrating radar survey with a multi‐element array antenna: results from field application on archaeological sites. Archaeological Prospection17, 187–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MasiniN., LasaponaraR. and OreficiG.2009. Addressing the challenge of detecting archaeological adobe structures in Southern Peru using QuickBird imagery. Journal of Cultural Heritage10S, e3–e9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MateraL., CiminaleM., PersicoR., GiannottaM.T., DesantisV. and AlessioA.2014. Application of a reconfigurable stepped frequency system to cultural heritage prospecting. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Brussels, Belgium.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. NovielloM., CiminaleM. and De PasqualeV.2013. Combined application of pansharpening and enhancement methods to improve archaeological cropmark visibility and identification in QuickBird imagery: two case studies from Apulia, Southern Italy. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 3604–3613.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ParriniF., PersicoR., PieracciniM., SpinettiA., MacalusoG., FratiniM.et al.2011. A reconfigurable stepped frequency GPR (GPR‐R). Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2011, Vancouver, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. PersicoR.2014. Introduction to Ground Penetrating Radar: Inverse Scattering and Data Processing.Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. PersicoR., CiminaleM. and MateraL.2014. A new reconfigurable stepped frequency GPR system, possibilities and issues; applications to two different Cultural Heritage Resources. Near Surface Geophysics12(6), 793–801.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. PersicoR., LeucciG., MateraL., CiminaleM., DeiD., ParriniF.et al.2013a. Applications of a reconfigurable stepped frequency GPR in the Chapel of the Holy Spirit, Lecce (Italy). Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar, Nantes, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. PersicoR., MasiniN., MateraL. and CiminaleM.2013b. Reconfigurable stepped frequency ground penetrating radar: a preliminary experimental test. Proceedings of Cost Action TU1208, Rome, Italy, pp. 63–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. PersicoR. and PriscoG.2008. A reconfigurative approach for SF‐GPR prospecting. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation56(8), 2673–2680.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PersicoR., SoldovieriF. and PierriR.2002. Convergence properties of a quadratic approach to the inverse scattering problem. Journal of Optical Society of America Part A19(12), 2424–2428.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PierriR., LeoneG., SoldovieriF. and PersicoR.2001. Electromagnetic inversion for subsurface applications under the distorted Born approximation. Nuovo Cimento24C(2), 245–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. PiroS. and GabrielliR.2009. Multimethodological approach to investigate chamber tombs in the Sabine Necropolis at Colle del Forno (CNR, Rome, Italy). Archaeological Prospection16, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. PiscitelliS., RizzoE., CristalloF., LapennaV., CroccoL., PersicoR.et al.2007. GPR and microwave tomography for detecting shallow cavities in the historical area of Sassi of Matera (Southern Italy). Near Surface Geophysics5, 275–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SalaJ. and LinfordN.2010. Processing stepped frequency continuous wave GPR system so to obtain maximum value from archaeological data sets. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ground Penetrating, Lecce, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ScollarI., TabbaghA., HesseA. and HerzogI.1990. Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing.Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. ShahrukM., SoupiosP., PapadopoulosN. and SarrisA.2012. Geophysical investigations at the Istron archaeological site, eastern Crete, Greece using seismic refraction and electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering9, 749–760.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. TrinksI., JohanssonB., GustafssonJ., EmilssonJ., FriborgJ., GustafssonC.et al.2010. Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating radar array system. Archaeological Prospection3, 175–186.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015042
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2015042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error