1887
Volume 14 Number 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This experimental study presents a comparison between two‐dimensional azimuthal and three‐dimensional electrical resistivity imaging techniques at a given location within the Abu‐Jir Fault Zone, Central Iraq. The aim is to examine which one is a better technique in one order to study the subsurface fracture zones and to use it within and outside the fault zone. Our results show that the two‐dimensional azimuthal imaging technique is quite successful in imaging the structural geology, particularly for effective identification and delineation of the subsurface fracture zones in all directions, whereas the three‐dimensional imaging technique, carried out using data acquired in parallel two‐dimensional imaging lines, gives limited and distorted images about these zones because the Y‐spacing between the survey lines is quite small compared to the length of these lines. The two‐dimensional azimuthal technique can be useful in deep investigations to determine the extent of the structures, particularly in areas with unknown geological and structural settings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2016020
2016-07-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AizebeokhaiA.P. and OlayinkaA.I.2010. Anomaly effects of arrays for 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging using orthogonal or parallel 2D profiles. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology7, 446–454.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐HameedawieM.A.2013. Comparison between different electrode arrays in delineating aquifer boundary by using 1D and 2D techniques in north Badra area eastern Iraq.MSc thesis (Unpublished), University of Baghdad, Iraq, 142p.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al‐MubarakM. and AminR.M.1983. Regional mapping of south and western desert of Iraq. Internal Report. GEOSURV Library, 1380. Baghdad, Iraq.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alsa’diM.2010. The effect of Abu‐Jir Fault Zone on the distribution and quality of ground water in Iraq. PhD thesis (Unpublished), University of Baghdad, Iraq, 184p.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Al‐ShamariM.2014. Groundwater quality evolution in Tar AL‐Sayyed area, south Razaza Lake, Central Iraq.MSc thesis (Unpublished), University of Baghdad, Iraq, 145p.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Al‐ZubediA.S. and ThabitJ.M.2014. Comparison between 2D imaging and vertical electrical sounding in aquifer delineation: a case study of south and south west of Samawa City (IRAQ). Arabian Journal of Geosciences7, 173–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BentleyL.R. and GharibiM.2004. Two‐ and three‐dimensional electrical resistivity imaging at a heterogeneous remediation site. Geophysics69, 674–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BusbyJ.P.2000. The effectiveness of azimuthal apparent resistivity measurements as a method for determining fracture strike orientations. Geophysical Prospecting48, 677–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BusbyJ.P. and JacksonP.2006. The application of time‐lapse azimuthal apparent resistivity measurements for the prediction of coastal cliff failure. Journal of Appalled Geophysics59, 261–272.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ChambersJ.C., KurasO., MeldrumP.I., OgilvyR.D. and HollandsJ.2006. Electrical resistivity tomography applied to geologic, hydrogeologic, and engineering investigations at a former waste‐disposal site. Geophysics71, 231–239.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ChambersJ.E., OgilvyR.D., KurasO., CrippsJ.C. and MeldrumP.I.2002. 3D electrical imaging of known targets at a controlled environmental test site. Environmental Geology41, 690–704.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ClaerboutJ.F. and MuirF.1973. Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics38, 826–844.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Consortium
    Consortium . 1977. Water Development Project Western Desert, Block‐7, Hydrogeological Exploration and Hydrotechnical Works, Climatology and Hydrology, Final Report 1, 39 P.
  14. deGroot‐HedlinC. and ConstableS.1990. Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics55, 1613–1624.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FordD.C. and WilliamsP.W.2007. Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology.Chichester, UK, 562 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FouadS.F.2004. Contribution to the structure of Abu Jir Fault Zone. Iraqi Geological Journal32, 63–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GCGW
    GCGW . 2010. General Commission for Groundwater, Karbala Project, Data of the Drilled Wells, Iraq.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GradesZ.E.D.2004. Inversion methods and resolution analysis for the 2D/3D reconstruction of resistivity structures from DC.PhD thesis, Technischen Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany, 160pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HagreyS.A.1994. Electric study of fracture anisotropy at Falkenberg, Germany. Geophysics59, 881–888.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. JohnsonT.C., VersteegR.J., WardA., Day‐LewisF.D. and RevilA.2010. Improved hydrogeophysical characterization and monitoring through parallel modeling and inversion of time‐domain resistivity and induced‐polarization data. Geophysics75, 27–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. KemnaA., KulessaB. and VereeckenH.2002. Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models. Journal of Hydrology267, 125–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Leonard‐MayerP.1984. A surface resistivity method for measuring hydrologic characteristics of jointed formations. U.S. Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations8901.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LiY. and OldenburgD.W.1992. Approximate inverse mappings in DC resistivity problems. Geophysical Journal International109, 343–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LiuB., LiS.C., NieL.C., WangJ., X. L. and ZhangQ.S.2012. 3D resistivity inversion using an improved genetic algorithm based on control method of mutation direction. Journal of Applied Geophysics87, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LokeM.H.2012. Tutorial: 2D and 3D Electrical Imaging Surveys, 165p.
  26. LokeM.H.2014. Tutorial: 2D and 3D Electrical Imaging Surveys, 188p.
  27. LokeM.H., ChambersJ.E., RuckerD.F., KurasO. and WilkinsonP.P.2013. Recent developments in the direct‐current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics95, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. NimmerR.E., OsienskyJ.L., BinleyA.M. and WilliamsB.C.2008. Three‐dimensional effects causing artifacts in two‐dimensional, cross‐borehole, electrical imaging. Journal of Hydrology359, 59–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. OlayinkaA.I. and YaramanciU.2000. Assessment of the reliability of 2D inversion of apparent resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting48, 293–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ParkS.K. and VanG.P.1991. Inversion of pole‐pole data for 3‐D resistivity structures beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics56, 951–960.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PavlovaA.M. and ShevninV.A.2013. 3D electrical resistivity tomography in glacial sediments. Near Surface Geoscience‐19th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Bochum, Germany, 9–11 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. RuckerD.F., LevittM.T. and GreenwoodW.J.2009a. Three‐dimensional electrical resistivity model of a nuclear waste disposal site. Journal of Applied Geophysics69, 150–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. TaylorR.W. and FlemingA.H.1988. Characterizing jointed systems by azimuthal resistivity surveys. Groundwater26, 464–474.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. WatsonK.A. and BarkerR.D.1999. Differentiating anisotropy and lateral effects using azimuthal resistivity offset Wenner soundings. Geophysics64, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. WolkeR. and SchwetlickH.1988. Iteratively reweighted least squares algorithms, convergence analysis, and numerical comparisons. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computations9, 907–921.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ZhouQ.Y., MatsuiH. and ShimadaJ.2004. Characterization of the unsaturated zone around a cavity in fractured rocks using electrical resistivity tomography. Journal of Hydraulic Research42, 25–31.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2016020
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2016020
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error