Mapping of hydrocarbon‐ and scrap‐metal‐contaminated soil using volatile organic compounds and electromagnetic profiling methods

References

1. Abdel Aal OmarG.Z., AtekwanaE., SlaterL.D. and AtekwanaE.A.2004. Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments.Geophysical Research Letters31, 1–4.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AdelusiA.O., AkinlaluA.A. and AdebayoS.S.2013. Geophysical and hydrochemistry methods for mapping groundwater contamination around Aule area, Akure, Southwestern Nigeria.International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering5, 442–451.
   [Google Scholar]
3. API.1991. An evaluation of soil gas and geophysical techniques for detection of hydrocarbons.API Publication No. 4509, Health and Environmental Sciences Department, American Petroleum Institute, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
4. AtekwanaE., CassidyD.P., MagnusonC., EndresA.L., WerkemaJr.D.D. and SauckW.A.2001. Changes in geoelectrical properties accompanying microbial degradation of LNAPL.Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Denver, CO.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Belmonte‐JiménezS., Bortolotti‐VillalobosA., Campos‐EnriquezJ., Pérez‐FloresM.A., Delgado‐RodríguezO. and Ladrón de Guevara‐TorresM.A.2014. Electromagnetic methods application for characterizing a site contaminated by leachates.Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental30, 317–329.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BouyoucosG.J.1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method.Soil Science42, 225–228.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BriggsI.C.1974. Machine contouring using minimum curvature.Geophysics39, 39–48.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Delgado‐RodríguezO., ShevninV., Ochoa‐ValdésJ. and RyjovA.2006a. Geoelectrical characterization of a site with hydrocarbon contamination caused by pipeline leakage.Geofísica Internacional45, 63–72.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Delgado‐RodríguezO., ShevninV., Ochoa‐ValdésJ. and RyjovA.2006b. Using electrical techniques for planning the remediation process in a hydrocarbon contaminated site.Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental22, 157–163.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Delgado‐RodríguezO., Flores‐HernándezD., Amezcua‐AllieriM.A., ShevninV., Rosas‐MolinaA. and Marín‐CórdovaS.2014. Joint interpretation of geoelectrical and volatile organic compounds data: a case study in a hydrocarbons contaminated urban site.Geofísica Internacional53, 183–198.
    [Google Scholar]
11. El‐QadyG., MetwalyM. and KhozaymA.2014. Tracing buried pipelines using multi frequency electromagnetic.NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics3, 101–107.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Geonics Limited.2010. EM31‐MK2. Operating Manual, 51 pp.
13. Geoprobe System.2016. Model 5410. Technical Specifications, 2 pp.
14. Golden Software, Inc.2014. Surfer 12. User's Guide. Powerful Contouring, Gridding, and Surface Mapping, 124 pp.
15. GustafsonJ.1997. Using TPH in risk‐based corrective action. Shell Development Corporation.Published on the Internet by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Underground Storage Tanks.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HeronG., CarrollS. and NielsenS.G.2005. Full‐scale removal of DNAPL constituents using steam‐enhanced extraction and electrical resistance heating.Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation25(4), 92–107.
    [Google Scholar]
17. HortonR.J.2003. Application of Magnetic and Electromagnetic Methods to Locate Buried Metal.USGS Open‐File Report 03–317, 3 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HuangH. and WonI.J.2004. Electromagnetic detection of buried metallic objects using quad–quad conductivity.Geophysics69(6), 1387–1393.
    [Google Scholar]
19. KayaM.A., ÖzürlanG. and ŞengülE.2007.Delineation of soil and groundwater contamination using geophysical methods at a waste disposal site in Çanakkale, Turkey.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment135(1), 441–446.
    [Google Scholar]
20. KellerG.V. and FrischknechtF.C.1966. Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting. Oxford, UK:Pergamon Press, 517 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
21. KonečnýF., BoháčekZ., MüllerP., KovářováM. and SedláckováI.2003. Contamination of soils and groundwater by petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds—Case study: ELSLAV BRNO.Bulletin of Geosciences78(3), 225–239.
    [Google Scholar]
22. KorhonenK., KuivamäkiA., RuotoistenmäkiT. and PaananenM.2005. Interpretation of lineaments from airborne geophysical and topographic data.An alternative model within version Laxemar 1.2 of the Oskarshamn modelling project, Geological Survey of Finland SKB P‐05–247, 39 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
23. KoromaS., AratoA. and GodioA.2015. Analyzing geophysical signature of a hydrocarbon‐contaminated soil using geoelectrical surveys.Environmental Earth Sciences74, 2937–2948.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LerdauM., GuentherA. and MonsonR.1997. Plant production and emission of volatile organic compounds: plant‐produced hydrocarbons influence not only the plant itself but the atmosphere as well.BioScience47, 373–383.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LinJ.H. and ChouM.S.2006. Henry's law constant variations of volatile organic compounds in wastewater and activated sludge.Aerosol and Air Quality Research6(2), 180–192.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LinC., OwenS. and PeñuelasJ.2007. Volatile organic compounds in the roots and rhizosphere of Pinus spp.Soil Biology and Biochemistry39, 951–960.
    [Google Scholar]
27. MarrinD. and KerfootB.1988. Soil‐gas surveying techniques: a new way to detect volatile organic contaminants in the subsurface.Environmental Science and Technology22(7), 740–745.
    [Google Scholar]
28. NwankwoC.N. and EmujakporueG.O.2012. Geophysical method of investigating groundwater and sub‐soil contamination—A case study.American Journal of Environmental Engineering2(3), 49–53.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ontario Geological Survey.2003. Ontario airborne geophysical surveys, magnetic data, Oba Kapuskasing area.Geophysical Data Set 1024 –Revised, 67 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
30. OrfanosC. and ApostolopoulosG.2012. Analysis of different geophysical methods in the detection of an underground opening at a controlled test site.Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society15(1), 7–18.
    [Google Scholar]
31. PeñuelasJ., AsensioD., ThollD., WenkeK., RosenkranzM., PiechullaB. et al. 2014. Biogenic volatile emissions from the soil.Plant, Cell and Environment.
    [Google Scholar]
32. PHOTOVAC, Inc., 2002. Photoionization Monitor2020, 2 pp.
33. PréndezM., CarvajalV., CoradaK., MoralesJ., AlarcónF. and PeraltaH.2013. Biogenic volatile organic compounds from the urban forest of the Metropolitan Region, Chile.Environmental Pollution183, 143–150.
    [Google Scholar]
34. RAE Systems.1999. Environmental Applications for PIDs, Application Note AP‐214, Rev.2.CWt.12/99, 5 pp.
35. RosalesR.M., Martínez‐PaganP., FazA. and Moreno‐CornejoJ.2012. Environmental monitoring using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) in the subsoil of three former petrol stations in SE of Spain.Water, Air, and Soil Pollution223(7), 3757–3773.
    [Google Scholar]
36. RuckerD.F.2010. The application of magnetic gradiometry and electromagnetic induction at a former radioactive waste disposal site.Waste Management and Research28, 364–372.
    [Google Scholar]
37. SiemonB.2009. Levelling of helicopter‐borne frequency‐domain electromagnetic data.Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 206–218.
    [Google Scholar]
38. TPHCWG.1998. Analysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Environmental Media.Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group, Series 1.Amherst, MA:Amherst Scientific Publishers, 98 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
39. WenkeK., KaiM. and PiechullaB.2010. Belowground volatiles facilitate interactions between plant roots and soil organisms.Planta231(3), 499–506.
    [Google Scholar]
40. WestphalenO. and RiceJ.1992. Drum Detection: EM vs. MAG. Some revealing tests.Ground Water Management2, 665–688.
    [Google Scholar]
41. ŻogałaB., MendeckiM.J., ZuberekW.M. and RobakM.2012. Application of self‐potential method in the area contaminated with oil derivatives.Acta Geodyn Geomater9(2), 179–189.
    [Google Scholar]