1887
Volume 15 Number 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an integrated and iterative approach to the identification and understanding of seafloor and shallow geohazards at a complex geologic setting in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. The approach, focusing on geophysical data gathering and processing, allowed continuous improvement in the understanding of individual geohazard risks ahead of any eventual selection of wildcat drilling locations.

The progressive development of increased image resolution has included the use of the following data types: exploration 3D, autonomous underwater vehicle seabed clearance, short‐offset 3D, a full‐waveform inversion velocity model, HR3D acquisition, HR3D, autonomous underwater vehicle high‐resolution sonar, and seabed photographic transects.

Data have assisted in revealing the presence and the understanding of, numerous seafloor and sub‐seafloor geologic features that could potentially affect the choice of well location, well trajectory, and final drilling practices. Features that have been defined have included active benthic communities, widespread seafloor faulting, multi‐scale active seabed expulsion features, slope‐failure scarps, mass transport complexes, shallow gas, and various effects from the presence and transmission of shallow overpressure towards the seafloor.

The final, integrated geologic model that is developed will allow selection of well surface locations and trajectories that meet local regulatory requirements for safe drilling and environmental protection, as well as the adoption of safe drilling practices to mitigate identified hazards.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017026
2017-06-01
2020-02-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlbertyM.W., HafleM.E., MingeJ.C. and ByrdT.M.1999. Mechanisms of shallow waterflows and drilling practices for intervention.SPE Drilling and Completions14(2), 123–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BrookshireB., LippusC., ParishA., MattoxB. and BurksA.2016. Dense arrays of short streamers for ultrahigh‐resolution 3D seismic imaging.The Leading Edge35(7), 594–599.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.2009. Notice to Lessees and Operators of Federal Oil, Gas, and Sulphur Leases in the Outer Continental Shelf, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, Deepwater Benthic Communities.United States Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico, NTL 2009 G40.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CampbellK.1999. Deepwater geohazards: how significant are they.The Leading Edge18(4), 514–519.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CampbellK., KinnearS. and ThameA.2015. AUV technology for seabed characterization and geohazards assessment.The Leading Edge34(2), 170–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CowlardA.P.1996. Drill site geohazard identification facilitated by rework of suitable existing 3D seismic data volumes.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 1996, Paper 7970.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DinglerJ., RobertshawA.R., WoodG.A. and HillA.W.2016. Riserless monitoring of top‐hole drilling: The value of real‐time pre‐drill prediction verification.EAGE Applied Shallow Marine Geophysics Conference, Barcelona, Spain, September 2016, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GeorgeR.A., GeeL., HillA.W., ThomsonJ.A. and JeanjeanP.2002. High‐resolution AUV surveys of the Eastern Sigsbee Escarpment.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 2002, Paper 14137.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HewittA.T., SmithJ.L. and WeilandR.J.2008. AUV and ROV data integration to predict environmentally sensitive biological communities in deep‐water.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 2008, Paper 19358.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HillA.W., WoodG.A. and ScherschelC.2013. Fundamental and specific marine geohazard risk assessment categorization.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 2013, Paper 24211.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HillA.W., ArogunmatiY., WoodG.A., AttoeD., FiskeM.F., DinglerA. et al. 2015. Slicing and dicing HR seismic acquisition: varied approaches to delivery of 3D HR seismic data volumes for drilling hazards studies.The Leading Edge34(4), 380–382, 384–384, 386–388.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HillA.W. and WoodG.A.2015. Managing marine geohazard risks over the full business cycle.SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, London, UK, March 2015, Paper 173139.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HuffmanR. and CastagnaJ.2001. The petrophysical basis for shallow‐water flow prediction using multicomponent seismic data.The Leading Edge20(9), 1030–1052.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.2013. Guidelines for the conduct of offshore drilling hazard site surveys.International Association of Oil and Gas Producers, Report 373–18‐1, April 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LiH., CernoohJ., VighD. and KapoorJ.2014. The analysis of an FWI velocity model for potential shallow geohazards in Gulf of Mexico.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014, 1167–1171.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. OstermeierR.M., PelletierJ.H., WinkerC.D., NicholsonJ.W., RambowF.H. and CowanK.M.2000. Dealing with shallow‐water flow in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 2000, Paper 11972.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ShippC., NottJ. and NewlinJ.2004. Physical characteristics and impact of mass transport complexes on deepwater jetted conductors and suction anchor piles.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 2004, Paper 16751.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. WeilandR.J., AdamsG.P., McDonaldR.D., RooneyT.C. and WillsL.M.2008. geological and biological relationships in the Puma appraisal area: From salt diapirism to chemosynthetic communities.Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May 2008, Paper 19360.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017026
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017026
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error