oa Measurement of geophysical parameters on clay samples at the solid–fluid transition

References

1. Abu‐HassaneinZ., BensonC. and BlotzL.R.1996. Electrical resistivity of compacted clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering122(5), 397–406.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AnceyC.2007. Plasticity and geophysical flows: a review. Journal of Non‐Newtonian Fluid Mechanics142, 4–35.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ArchieG.1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mechanics Engineering146, 54–62.
   [Google Scholar]
4. AtkinsE. and SmithG.1961. The significance of particle shape in formation factor porosity relationship. Journal of Petroleum Technology13, 285–291.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BardouE., RavotE., MetzgerR., SpinelloI., RielleN. and JaboyedoffM.2007. Coupling between hillslope processes and river system. Case study of La Tinière, Southwestern Switzerland. Geophysical Research Abstracts9, 03009.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BarfétyJ., BarbierR., BorderP.J.F., PetitevilleJ., RivoirardR. and MelouxJ.1997. Carte géologique (1/50000), Saint Jean de Maurienne (74). Notice explicative par. Orléans BRGM.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BeckY., Palma LopesS., FerberV. and CoteP.2011. Microstructural interpretation of water content and dry density influence on the DC electrical resistivity of a fine grained soil. Geotechnical Testing Journal34(6), 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BièvreG., JongmansD., WiniarskiT. and ZumboV.2012. Application of geophysical measurements for assessing the role of fissures in water infiltration within a clay landslide (Trièves area, French Alps). Hydrological Processes26(14), 2128–2142.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BièvreG., KniessU., JongmansD., PathierE., SchwartzS., van WestenC.et al. 2011. Paleotopographic control of landslides in lacustrine deposits (Trièves plateau, French Western Alps). Geomorphology125, 214–224.
   [Google Scholar]
10. BrenguierF., CampilloM., HadziioannouC., ShapiroN., NadeauR. and LaroseE.2008. Postseismic relaxation along the San Andreas fault at Parkfield from continuous seismological observations. Science321(5895), 1478–1481.
    [Google Scholar]
11. CampilloM., RouxP. and ShapiroN.2011. Using seismic noise to image and to monitor the solid earth. Gupta, H.K. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, 1230‐1235.
    [Google Scholar]
12. CarrièreS., JongmansD., ChambonG., BièvreG., LansonB., BertelloL.et al. 2016. Rheometric properties of clayey soils originating from flow‐like landslides. Journal of Geophysical Research.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ChambersJ., GunnD., WilkinsonP., MeldrumP., HaslamE., HolyoakeS.et al. 2014. 4D electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of soil moisture dynamics in an operational railway embankment. Near Surface Geophysics12(1), 61–72.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ChambersJ., WilkinsonP., KurasO., FordJ., GunnD., MeldrumP.et al. 2011. Three‐dimensional geophysical anatomy of an active landslide in Lias Group mudrocks, Cleveland Basin, (UK). Geomorphology125(4), 472–484.
    [Google Scholar]
15. ClavierC., CoatesG. and DumanoirJ.1984. Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual‐water model for interpretation of shaly sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal24, 153–168.
    [Google Scholar]
16. CoussotP., NguyenQ., HuynhH. and BonnD.2002. Avalanche behavior in yield stress fluids. Physical Review Letters88(17), 175501.
    [Google Scholar]
17. CoussotP., RousselN., JarnyS. and ChansonH.2005. Continuous or catastrophic solid–liquid transition in jammed systems. Physics of Fluids17, 011704.
    [Google Scholar]
18. DoebelinN. and KleebergR.2015. Profex: a graphical user interface for the Rietveld refinement program (BGMN). Journal of Applied Crystallography48(5), 1573–1580.
    [Google Scholar]
19. EilertsenR., HansenL., BargelT. and SolbergI.2008. Clay slides in the Maalselv valley, northern Norway: characteristics, occurrence, and triggering mechanisms. Geomorphology,93(3–4), 548–562.
    [Google Scholar]
20. FukueM., MinatoT., HoribeH. and TayaN.1999. The micro‐structures of clay given by resistivity measurements. Engineering Geology54(1–2), 43–53.
    [Google Scholar]
21. GattinoniP., ScesiL., ArieniL. and CanavesiM.2012. The February 2010 large landslide at Maierato, Vibo Valentia, Southern Italy. Landslides9(2), 255–261.
    [Google Scholar]
22. GloverP., HoleM. and PousJ.2000. A modified Archie’s law for two conducting phases. Earth and Planetary Science Letters180(3–4), 369–383.
    [Google Scholar]
23. GombergJ., SchulzW., BodinP. and KeanJ.2011. Seismic and geodetic signatures of fault slip at the Slumgullion Landslide Natural Laboratory. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth116(B9), 2156‐2202.
    [Google Scholar]
24. HungrO., LeroueilS. and PicarelliL.2014. The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides11(2), 167–194.
    [Google Scholar]
25. HunterJ., BenjumeaB., HarrisJ., MillerR., PullanS. and BurnsR.2002. Surface and downhole shear wave seismic methods for thick soil site investigations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering22(9–12), 931–941.
    [Google Scholar]
26. IversonR.2005. Regulation of landslide motion by dilatancy and pore pressure feedback. Journal of Geophysical Research110(F2), F02015.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Iverson, R. and GeorgeD.2016. Modelling landslide liquefaction, mobility bifurcation and the dynamics of the 2014 Oso disaster. Géotechnique66(3), 175–187
    [Google Scholar]
28. IversonR., GeorgeD., AllstadtK., ReidM., CollinsB., VallanceJ.et al. 2015. Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster. Earth and Planetary Science Letters412, 197–208.
    [Google Scholar]
29. JaboyedoffM., PedrazziniA., LoyeA., OppikoferT., i PonsM. and LocatJ.2009. Earth flow in a complex geological environment: the example of Pont Bourquin, Les Diablerets (Western Switzerland). In: Landslide Processes, From Geomorphologic Mapping to Dynamic Modelling (eds. J.‐P.Malet, A.Remaitre, and T.Bogaard). Proceedings of the Landslide Processes Conference, Strasbourg, France
    [Google Scholar]
30. JongmansD. and GaramboisS.2007. Geophysical investigation of landslides: a review. Bulletin Société Géologique de France178(2), 101–112.
    [Google Scholar]
31. JongmansD.B.G., SchwartzS. and RenalierF.2009. Geophysical investigation of a large landslide in glaciolacustrine clays in the Trièves area (French Alps). Engineering Geology109, 45–56.
    [Google Scholar]
32. KalinskiR. and KellyW.1993. Estimating water content of soils from electrical resistivity. Geotechnical Testing Journal16(3), 323–329.
    [Google Scholar]
33. KhaldounA., MollerP., FallA., WegdamG., De LeeuwB., MéheustY.et al. 2009. Quick clay and landslides of clayey soils. Physical Review Letters103(18), 188301.
    [Google Scholar]
34. LaroseE., CarrièreS., VoisinC., BottelinP., BailletL., GuéguenP.et al. 2015. Environmental seismology: what can we learn on earth surface processes with ambient noise?Journal of Applied Geophysics116, 62–74.
    [Google Scholar]
35. LebourgT., HernandezM., ZeratheS., El BedouiS., JomardH. and FresiaB.2010. Landslides triggered factors analysed by time lapse electrical survey and multidimensional statistical approach. Engineering Geology114(3–4), 238–250.
    [Google Scholar]
36. MainsantG., ChambonG., JongmansD., LaroseE. and BailletL.2015. Shear‐wave‐velocity drop prior to clayey mass movement in laboratory flume experiments. Engineering Geology192, 26–32.
    [Google Scholar]
37. MainsantG., JongmansD., ChambonG., LaroseE. and BailletL.2012a. Shear‐wave velocity as an indicator for rheological changes in clay materials: lessons from laboratory experiments. Geophysical Research Letters39(19), L19301.
    [Google Scholar]
38. MainsantG., LaroseE., BrönnimannC., JongmansD., MichoudC., and Jaboyedoff, M.2012b. Ambient seismic noise monitoring of a clay landslide: toward failure prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface117(F1), F01030.
    [Google Scholar]
39. MaletJ., LaigleD., RemaitreA. and MaquaireO.2005. Triggering conditions and mobility of debris flows associated to complex earthflows. Geomorphology66(1), 215–235.
    [Google Scholar]
40. MarescotL., RigobertS., Palma LopesS., LagabrielleR. and ChapellierD.2006. A general approach for DC apparent resistivity evaluation on arbitrarily shaped 3D structures. Journal of Applied Geophysics60(1), 55–67.
    [Google Scholar]
41. MerrittA., ChambersJ., WilkinsonP., WestL., MurphyW., GunnD.et al. 2016. Measurement and modelling of moisture‐electrical resistivity relationship of fine‐grained unsaturated soils and electrical anisotropy. Journal of Applied Geophysics124, 155–165.
    [Google Scholar]
42. MobuchonC., CarreauP.J., HeuzeyM.C. and VermantJ.2009. Anisotropy of nonaqueous layered silicate suspensions subjected to shear flow. Journal of Rheology53(3), 517–538.
    [Google Scholar]
43. PaineauE., MichotL., BihannicI. and BaravianC.2011. Aqueous suspensions of natural swelling clay minerals. 2. Rheological characterization. Langmuir27(12), 7806–7819.
    [Google Scholar]
44. PerroneA., LapennaV. and PiscitelliS.2014. Electrical resistivity tomography technique for landslide investigation: a review. Earth‐Science Reviews135, 65–82.
    [Google Scholar]
45. PicarelliL., UrciuoliG., RamondiniM. and ComegnaL.2005. Main features of mudslides in tectonised highly fissured clay shales. Landslides2(1), 15–30.
    [Google Scholar]
46. PignonF. and MagninA.P.P.1998. Thixotropic behavior of clay dispersions: combinations of scattering and rheometric techniques. Journal of Rheology42(6), 1349–1373.
    [Google Scholar]
47. PignonF., MagninA. and PiauJ.‐P.1997. Butterfly light scattering pattern and rheology of a sheared thixotropic clay gel. Physical Review Letters79(23), 4689–4692.
    [Google Scholar]
48. PujariS., DoughertyL., MobuchonC., Carreau, P.J., Heuzey, M.‐C. and BurghardtW.R.2011. X‐ray scattering measurements of particle orientation in a sheared polymer/clay dispersion. Rheologica Acta50(1), 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
49. RenalierF, BièvreG, JongmansD., CampilloM., and BardP.‐Y.2010. Characterization and monitoring of unstable clay slopes using active and passive shear wave velocity measurements. In: Advances in Near‐Surface Seismology and Ground‐Penetrating Radar (eds. R.D.Miller, J.D.Bradford and K.Holliger), pp. 397–414. Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tulsa, USA,.
    [Google Scholar]
50. RevilA., CathlesL.M., LoshS. and NunnJ.A.1998. Electrical conductivity in shaly sands with geophysical applications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth103(B10), 23925–23936.
    [Google Scholar]
51. ReyE. and JongmansD.2007. A 2D numerical study of the effect of particle shape and orientation on resistivity in shallow formations. Geophysics72(1), 9–17.
    [Google Scholar]
52. ReynoldsJ.1997. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics.Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
53. RussellE. and BarkerR.2010. Electrical properties of clay in relation to moisture loss. Near Surface Geophysics8(2), 173–180.
    [Google Scholar]
54. SalloumN., JongmansD., CornouC., Youssef Abdel MassihD., Hage ChehadeF., VoisinC.et al. 2014. The shear wave velocity structure of the heterogeneous alluvial plain of Beirut (Lebanon): combined analysis of geophysical and geotechnical data. Geophysical Journal International199(2), 894–913.
    [Google Scholar]
55. SantamarinaJ.C, KleinK.A. and PrenckeE.2002. Specific surface: determination and relevance. Canadian Geotechnical Journal39, 233–241.
    [Google Scholar]
56. ShahP. and SinghD.2005. Generalized Archie’s law for estimation of soil electrical conductivity. Journal of ASTM International2(5), 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
57. ShefferM.R., ReppertP.M. and HowieJ.A.2007. A laboratory apparatus for streaming potential and resistivity measurements on soil samples. Review of Scientific Instruments78(9), 094502.
    [Google Scholar]
58. SupperR., OttowitzD., JochumB., KimJ., RömerA., BaronI.et al. 2014. Geoelectrical monitoring: an innovative method to supplement landslide surveillance and early warning. Near Surface Geophysics12, 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
59. TabbaghA. and CosenzaP.2007. Effect of microstructure on the electrical conductivity of clay‐rich systems. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C32(1–7), 154–160.
    [Google Scholar]
60. TanakaH., MeunierJ. and BonnD.2004. Nonergodic states of charged colloidal suspensions: repulsive and attractive glasses and gels. Physical Review E.69, 031404.
    [Google Scholar]
61. TravellettiJ. and MaletJ.‐P.2012. Characterization of the 3D geometry of flow‐like landslides: a methodology based on the integration of heterogeneous multi‐source data. Engineering Geology128, 30–48.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Van AschT. and MaletJ‐P.2009. Flow‐type failures in fine‐grained soils: an important aspect in landslide hazard analysis. Natural Hazards Earth Systems Science9, 1703–1711.
    [Google Scholar]
63. WaxmanM. and SmitsL.1968. Electrical conductivities in oil‐bearing shaley sands. Society of Petrol Engineering Journal8, 107–122.
    [Google Scholar]