Factors Affecting Water Alternating Hydrocarbon Gas Miscible Flooding in a Low Permeability Reservoir

References

1. LiyaZ, JinP, ShishiT.
   1.LiyaZ, JinP, ShishiT.CO2-Rich Associated Gas Re-injection Miscible Flooding Mechanism Research [C]// Fourth International Conference on Computational & Information Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 2012.
   [Google Scholar]
2. LiuH, QuP, LiuY.
   2.LiuH, QuP, LiuY.Study on Flow Mechanism of Gas Injection in Porous Carbonate Core [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 941–944.
   [Google Scholar]
3. StalkupFI
   3.StalkupFI. Miscible displacement.Textbook series, vol. 8. Richardson, TX: SPE, 1983.
   [Google Scholar]
4. GreenDW, WillhiteGP.
   4.GreenDW, WillhiteGP.Enhanced oil recovery.Textbook series, vol.6. Richardson, TX: SPE, 1998.
   [Google Scholar]
5. KulkarniMM, RaoDN
   5.KulkarniMM, RaoDN. Experimental investigation of miscible and immiscible water-alternating-gas (WAG) process performance.J Petrol Sci Eng, 2005, 48(1):1–20.
   [Google Scholar]
6. SurguchevL, KorbolR, HaugenS, KrakstadO.
   6.SurguchevL, KorbolR, HaugenS, KrakstadO.Screening of WAG injection strategies for heterogeneous reservoirs.European petroleum conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
7. TourayS.
   7.TourayS.Effect of water alternating gas injection on ultimate oil recovery, 2013.
   [Google Scholar]
8. HustadOS, HoltT.
   8.HustadOS, HoltT.Gravity stable displacement of oil by hydrocarbon gas after waterflooding. SPE/DOE enhanced oil recovery symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HanL, GuY.
   9.HanL, GuY.Optimization of Miscible CO2 Water-Alternating-Gas Injection in the Bakken Formation [J].Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(11):6811–6819.
   [Google Scholar]
10. HallamR J, MaT D, ReinboldE W.
    10.HallamR J, MaT D, ReinboldE W.Performance evaluation and optimization of the Kuparuk hydrocarbon miscible water-alternating-gas flood [J].Geological Society, 1995, 84(1):153–164.
    [Google Scholar]
11. ChristensenJR, StenbyEH, SkaugeA.
    11.ChristensenJR, StenbyEH, SkaugeA.Review of WAG field experience.International petroleum conference and exhibition of Mexico. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ChristensenJR, StenbyEH, SkaugeA.
    12.ChristensenJR, StenbyEH, SkaugeA.Review of WAG field experience.SPE Reservoir Eval Eng, 2001, 4(02):97–106.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Koottungal, Leena
    13.Koottungal, Leena, “SPECIAL REPORT: EOR/Heavy Oil Survey: 2010 worldwide EOR survey,”Oil and Gas Journal, April 19, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ChenS, LiH, YangD, TontiwachwuthikulP.
    14.ChenS, LiH, YangD, TontiwachwuthikulP.Optimal parametric design for wateralternating-gas (WAG) process in a CO2-miscible flooding reservoir.J Can Pet Technol2010, 49(10):75–82.
    [Google Scholar]
15. SongZ, LiZ, WeiM, LaiF, BaiB
    15.SongZ, LiZ, WeiM, LaiF, BaiB. Sensitivity analysis of water-alternating-CO2 flooding for enhanced oil recovery in high water cut oil reservoirs.Comput Fluids2014, 99:93–103.
    [Google Scholar]
16. RogersJD, GriggRB
    16.RogersJD, GriggRB. A literature analysis of the WAG injectivity abnormalities in the CO2 process. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
17. AttanucciV, AslesenK, HejlK, WrightC
    17.AttanucciV, AslesenK, HejlK, WrightC. WAG process optimization in the Rangely CO2 miscible flood.In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]