Dynamic Capillarity during the Water Flooding Process in Fractured Low Permeability Reservoirs

References

1. Baldwin, B. A, E. ASpinler
   . A direct method for simultaneously determining positive and negative capillary pressure curves in reservoir rock.Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 1998, 20 (20): 161–165.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AbbasiJ., GhaediM., RiaziM.
   A new numerical approach for investigation of the effects of dynamic capillary pressure in imbibition process.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 162:44–54.
   [Google Scholar]
3. KirkhamD, FengCL
   . Some tests of the diffusion theory, and laws of capillary flow, in soils.Soil Sci, 1949;67(1):29–40.
   [Google Scholar]
4. NganC G and DussanE B.
   On the Nature of the dynamic contact angle: an experimental study.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1982, 118: 27–40.
   [Google Scholar]
5. HassanizadehS M, GrayW G.
   Thermodynamic basis of capillary pressure in porous media. Water resources research, 1993, 29(10): 3389–3407.
   [Google Scholar]
6. GrayW G and HassanizadehS M
   . Unsaturated flow theory including interfacial phenomena.Water Resources Research, 1991, 27(8): 1855–1863.
   [Google Scholar]
7. HassanizadehS M, CeliaM A and DahleH K
   . Dynamic effect in the capillary pressure-saturation relationship and its impact on unsaturated flow.Vadose Zone Journal, 2002, 1(1): 38–57.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barenblatt, G.I., Gilman, A.A.
   : Nonequilibrium counterflow capillary impregnation.J. Eng. Phys. 52(3), 335–339 (1987).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barenblatt, G.I., Garcia-Azorero, J., De Pablo, A., Vazquez, J.L.
   : Mathematical model of the non-equilibrium water–oil displacement in porous strata.Appl. Anal.65, 19–45 (1997).
   [Google Scholar]
10. O’CarrollD M, MumfordK G, AbriolaL M, et al.
    Influence of wettability variations on dynamic effects in capillary pressure.Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(8):416–428.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Camps-RoachG, O’CarrollD M, NewsonT A, SakakiT and IllangasekareT H.
    Experimental investigation of dynamic effects in capillary pressure: Grain size dependency and upscaling.Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(8): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ZhangH, HeS, JiaoC, et al.
    Investigation of dynamic effect of capillary pressure in ultra-low permeability sandstones.Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 45(1): 79–88.
    [Google Scholar]
13. TianS., LeiG., HeS., et al.
    Dynamic effect of capillary pressure in low permeability reservoirs.Petroleum exploration and development, 2012, 39(3): 405–411.
    [Google Scholar]
14. LiY., LiH., ChenS., et al.
    Capillarity Characters Measurement and Effects Analysis in Different Permeability Formations during Waterflooding.Fuel, 2017, 194(15):129–143.
    [Google Scholar]
15. SalimiH, BruiningJ.
    Upscaling of fractured oil reservoirs using homogenization including non-equilibrium capillary pressure and relative permeability.Computational Geosciences, 2012, 16(2):367–389.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dejam, M.
    Advective-diffusive-reactive solute transport due to non-Newtonian fluid flows in a fracture surrounded by a tight porous medium.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 128: 1307–1321.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Das, Diganta Bhusan, MahsanamMirzaei
    . Dynamic effects in capillary pressure relationships for two-phase flow in porous media: Experiments and numerical analyses. Aiche Journal, 2012, 58 (12): 3891–3903.
    [Google Scholar]
18. LiH., LiY., ChenS., et al.
    Effects of Chemical Additives on Dynamic Capillary Pressure during Waterflooding in Low Permeability Reservoirs. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30 (9): 7082–7093.
    [Google Scholar]
19. TangM., LuS., ZhanH., et al.
    The effect of a microscale fracture on dynamic capillary pressure of two-phase flow in porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 2018, 113: 272–284.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LiYing, LiHaitao, ChenShengnan, et al.
    The Second Critical Capillary Number for Chemical Flooding in Low Permeability Reservoirs: Experimental and Numerical Investigation[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.11.004.
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.11.004 [Google Scholar]
21. WangDashun, DiNiu, Huazhou AndyLi
    . Predicting Waterflooding Performance in Low-Permeability Reservoirs With Linear Dynamical Systems.SPE Journal, 2017, 22 (05): 1596–1608.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Das, D., and Mirzaei, M.
    Experimental Measurement of Dynamic Effect in Capillary Pressure Relationship for Two-Phase Flow in Weakly Layered Porous Media.AIChE J., 2013, 59(5):1723–1734.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LengT, BoF, SixuZ, et al.
    Performance Evaluation of Gas Production with Consideration of Dynamic Capillary Pressure in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs.Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
24. WhitmarshLorraine, NickNash, PaulUpham et al.
    UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support.Applied Energy, 2015, 160: 419–430.
    [Google Scholar]
25. QuX., FanJ., WangC., et al.
    Impact of Fractures on Water Flooding Seepage Features of Chang 7 Tight Cores in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin.Journal of Xian Shiyou University, 2017, 5(9): 1673–064X.
    [Google Scholar]