1887

Abstract

Magnetic gradient measurementsp ossesss everal advantages compared with other magnetic field measurementsin<br>shallow-site investigations, hazardous-waste site characterization, and other investigations to locate buried ferromagnetic<br>objects. These advantages include (1) immunity from time-varying geomagnetic noise, (2) improved spatial resolution<br>because of the more rapid spatial attenuation of the gradient components compared with magnetic field components, and<br>(3) generally low-background gradient values from geological effects. For this reason, conventional magnetic surveys for<br>site investigations and for object detection routinely acquire the vertical gradient of the total magnetic field with a pair of<br>identical proton or alkali vapor (e.g., Cesium) magnetometers with spatial separations of a few feet.<br>Quantitative interpretation of magnetic gradient data requires the knowledge of several components of the gradient (Hood<br>1965; Reid et. al 1990). Theoretically, these gradients can be calculated from a properly sampled map of one of the<br>components of magnetic field (Nabighian 1984), but the advantage to their direct measurement is that interpretation can<br>be performed with data acquired at a few data points along a profile. Consequently, interpretation in near real time either<br>during acquisition or immediately after it is therefore quite feasible.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.206.1995_048
1995-04-23
2021-11-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.206.1995_048
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error