1887

Abstract

Permafrost delineation and thickness determination is of great importance in engineering related projects in arctic areas. <br>In this paper, 2D geoelectrical measurements are applied and evaluated for permafrost mapping in an area in West Greenland. <br>Multi-electrode resistivity profiles (MEP) have been collected and are compared with borehole information. <br>It is shown that the permafrost thickness in this case is grossly overestimated by a factor of two to three. The difference between the inverted 2D resistivity sections and the borehole information is explained by macro-anisotropy due to the presence of horizontal ice-lenses in the frozen clay deposits. <br>It is concluded that where the resistivity method perform well for lateral permafrost mapping, great care should be taken in evaluating permafrost thickness based on 2D resistivity profiles alone. Additional information from boreholes or other geophysical techniques is needed for correct interpretation. <br>

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201402672
2006-09-04
2020-04-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201402672
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error