1887

Abstract

Summary

Core point selection plays vital role to ensure that cores are cut in best part of reservoir to fulfill objectives requested during well planning. Different methodologies are applied to select coring point. Depending on geological environment, these approaches reflect criticalities as rig time, offset of LWD tools, absence of markers etc. Here an innovative approach based on analysis of mud gas shows using GWD™ methodology is described. This methodology consists in computation of several ratios of hydrocarbon mixture (C1 to C5) continuously extracted from mud and monitored at rig site. A successful case history from a well recently drilled in Bhit field, Pakistan is presented. In this case, absence of drilling parameter changes and specific GR marker into thick shale sequence above reservoir does not allow proper identification of coring point. Gas data from two reference wells were analyzed and distinctive gas ratio trends between shale sequence and coring target were established, both qualitatively and quantitatively. After application of QC criteria, same trends were recognized in new well and coring point was selected even before scratching level of interest. Further confidence of quantitative aspects of methodology can lead to refine coring point selection, significantly saving rig time and costs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140636
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. HawkerD.
    , 2001, Enhanced Use of Well Site Gas Data and the Influence of Technology, AAPG Short Course Program - E&P Methods and Technologies, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Denver Colorado, June2001
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lloyd M.Wenger, Robert J.Pottorf, GordonMacleod, GlennOtten, SebastienDreyfus, HolgerJustwan, Emily SekulaWood
    ; 2009, Drill-Bit Metamorphism: Recognition and Impact on Show Evaluation, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 4–7 October 2009, SPE 125218
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GrazianoCapone, Lilik BudiRiyanto, CarloCarugo, GionataFerroni
    ; 2012, Advanced Mud Gas Detection System improves Formation Fluid Characterization while Drilling in Challenging Indonesia Deepwater: A Case History, Proceedings, Indonesian Petroleum Association, 36th Annual Convention & Exhibition, May2012
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wright. A.C.
    , 1996, Estimation of Gas/Oil Ratios and Detection of Unusual Formation Fluids from Mud Logging Gas Data, SPWLA, 37th Annual Logging Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. A.Mitchell, B.Barraud, G.Segalini, G.Beda, R.Quagliaroli
    ; 1999, Gas While Drilling (GWD); A Real Time Geologic and Reservoir Interpretation Tool, SPWLA, 40th Annual Logging Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. D.Kandel, R.Quagliaroli, G.Segalini, B.Barraud
    ; 2000, Improved Integrated Reservoir interpretation using the Gas While Drilling (GWD) Data, SPE European Petroleum Conference, 24–25 October 2000, Paris, France, SPE 65176
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FarzadIrani, S.P.Das, N.B.Ishwar, R.Sharma
    ; 2011, Logging While Drilling Aids Accurate Core Point Selection Providing Time Savings with Lower Risk, The 2nd South Asian Geoscience Conference and Exhibition, Geo India, 12–14 January, 2011, Gearter Noida, New Delhi, India; Paper ID 523
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GavinLindsay
    , 2008, An Analysis of the At-Bit Resistivity Decision Making Process, International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia, 3–5 December, 2008; IPTC 12513
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140636
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140636
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error