1887

Abstract

Summary

The effect of shear-wave splitting, an expression of an azimuthal anisotropic medium, has been observed in shear-wave seismic reflection recordings since at least the 1980’s. Since those early experiments it has been recognised that the existence of this phenomenon will degrade shear-wave images unless the issue is addressed adequately within data processing.

A 4-component converted-wave dataset acquired in the Arabian Gulf exhibits such shear-wave splitting. Significant azimuthal anisotropy within the overburden, and locally in excess of 10%, results in a severe loss of coherency on the radial component. Correcting for the shear-wave splitting in this and subsequent intervals dramatically improves both the vertical and spatial resolution, and therefore the interpretability, of the data.

The resulting attributes from the analyses also yield information on the evolution of the subsurface. Of particular note is the overprinting of the azimuthal anisotropy in the post-Eocene overburden by the pre-Turonian (Cretaceous) faulted anticline. This is consistent with an interpretation of late uplift of this deep structure and the consequent extension of the overburden in a direction orthogonal to the structural axis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140642
2014-06-16
2020-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alford, R.
    [1986] Shear Data in the Presence of Azimuthal Anisotropy: Dilley, Texas. 56th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 476–479
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg, E., Svenning, B., and Martin, J.
    [1994] SUMIC – Multicomponent sea-bottom seismic surveying in the North Sea – Data interpretation and applications. 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 477–480
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beydoun, Z.
    [1991] Arabian Plate hydrocarbon geology and potential, a plate tectonic approach. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Studies in Geology, 33, 77p
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaimov, T., Beaudoin, G., Haggard, W., Mueller, M., Thomsen, L.
    [1995] Shear-wave anisotropy and coalbed methane productivity. 65th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 305–308
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaiser, J.
    [1999] Applications for vector coordinate systems of 3-D converted-wave data. The Leading Edge, 181290–1300.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Granger, P-Y. Bonnot, J-M., Gresillaud, A., Rollet, A.
    [2001] C-wave resolution enhancement through birefringence compensation at the Valhall Field. 71st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 772–775
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Granli, J., Sollid, A., and Arnsten, B.
    [1995] Imaging through gas-filled sediments with marine S-wave data. 65th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 352–355
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gratacos, B.
    [2006] A Robust Algorithm and Associated QC for Finding the Anisotropy directions for Converted Wave Data. 68th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis, C., Davis, T., Vuillermoz, C., Gurch, M., Iverson, W., Schipperijn, A.
    [1989] Three-dimensional Multicomponent Imaging of Reservoir Heterogeneity, Silo Field, Wyoming. 59th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 763–766
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lynn, H., and Thomsen, L.
    [1986] Reflection Shear-Wave Data along the Principal Axes of Azimuthal Anisotropy. 56th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 473–476
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Olofsson, B., Probert, T., Kommedal, J., Barkved, O.
    [2003] Azimuthal anisotropy from the Valhall 4C 3D survey. The Leading Edge, 22, 1228–1235.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Potters, J., Groenendaal, H., Oates, S., Hake, J., Kalden, A.
    [1999] The 3D shear experiment over Natih field in Oman. Reservoir geology, data acquisition and anisotropy analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 47, 637–662
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Thomsen, L., Tsvankin, I., Mueller, M.
    [1995] Layer-stripping for azimuthal anisotropy of reflection seismic data. 65th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 289–292
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140642
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140642
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error