1887

Abstract

Summary

We suggest new objective functions for full waveform inversion in the time domain. These objective functions minimize the energy differences between observed and modeled data. We applied sequential time windows to the data and calculated the energy. A numerical example shows that the objective functions can be used to obtain a macrovelocity model. The recovered macro-velocity model can be used as an initial velocity for a subsequent inversion in the frequency domain to obtain high-resolution velocity information. Since we calculate the partial derivative of the energy objective function explicitly, heavy computational requirement is an important limitation of these objective functions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140701
2014-06-16
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aminzadeh, F., N.Burkhard, L.Nicoletis, and F.Rocca
    [1994] SEG/EAEG 3-D modeling project: 2nd update. The Leading Edge, 13, 949–952
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenders, A. J. and R. G.Pratt
    [2007] Full waveform tomography for lithospheric imaging: Results from a blind test in a realistic crustal model. Geophysical Journal International, 168, 133–151
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gauthier, O., J.Virieux, and A.Tarantola
    [1986] Two-dimensional nonlinear inversion of seismic waveforms: Numerical results. Geophysics, 51, 1387–1403
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kolb, P., F.Collino, and P.Lailly
    [1986] Prestack inversion of a 1d medium. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., 74, 498–506
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Marfurt, K. J.
    [1984] Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave-equations. Geophysics, 49, 533–549
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Operto, S., C.Ravaut, L.Improta, J.Virieux, A.Herrero, and P.Dell’Aversana
    [2004] Quantitative imaging of complex structures from dense wide-aperture seismic data by multiscale traveltime and waveform inversions. Geophysical Prospecting, 52, 625–651
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Plessix, R.
    [2006] A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 495–503
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pratt, R. G., C.Shin, and G. J.Hicks
    [1998] Gauss-newton and full newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 133, 341–362
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ravaut, C., S.Operto, L.Improta, J.Virieux, A.Herrero, and P.Dell’Aversana
    [2004] Multiscale imaging of complex structures from multifold wide-aperture seismic data by frequency-domain full-waveform tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 159, 1032–1056
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shin, C. and D. J.Min
    [2006] Waveform inversion using a logarithmic wavefield. Geophysics, 71, R31–R42
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shin, C., S.Pyun, J. B.Bednar
    [2007], Comparison of waveform inversion, part1: conventional wave field vs logarithmic wave field. Geophysical Prospecting, 55, 449–464
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tarantola, A.
    [2006] Inversion of seismic-reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49, 1259–1266
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140701
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140701
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error