The complications in anisotropic multi-parameter inversion lie in the trade-off between the different anisotropy parameters. We compute the tomographic waveform sensitivity kernels for a VTI acoustic medium perturbation as a tool to investigate this ambiguity between the different parameters. We use dynamic ray tracing to efficiently handle the expensive computational cost for 3-D anisotropic models. Ray tracing provides also the ray direction information necessary for conditioning the sensitivity kernels to handle anisotropy. The NMO velocity and η parameter kernels showed a maximum sensitivity for diving waves which results in a relevant choice of those parameters in wave equation tomography. The δ parameter kernel showed zero sensitivity; therefore it can serve as a secondary parameter to fit the amplitude in the acoustic anisotropic inversion. Considering the limited penetration depth of diving waves, migration velocity analysis based kernels are introduced to fix the depth ambiguity with reflections and compute sensitivity maps in the deeper parts of the model.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alkhalifah, T.
    [2000] An acoustic wave equation for anisotropic media. Geophysics, 65(4), 1239–1250.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkhalifah, T. and Plessix, R.É
    . [2014] A receipe for practical full waveform inversion in anisotropic media: An analytical parameter resolution study. Geophysics, Submitted.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Červenỳ, V.
    [2005] Seismic Ray Theory. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521018227.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahlen, F.A., Hung, S.H. and Nolet, G.
    [2000] Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes-I. theory. Geophys. J. Int., 141(1), 157–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Djebbi, R. and Alkhalifah, T.
    [2013] Finite frequency traveltime sensitivity kernels for acoustic anisotropic media: Angle dependent bananas. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG Expanded Abstracts, 4858–4863.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [2014] Traveltime sensitivity kernels for wave equation tomography using the unwrapped phase. Geophys. J. Int., accepted.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gholami, Y., Brossier, R., Operto, S., Ribodetti, A. and Virieux, J.
    [2013] Which parameterization is suitable for acoustic vertical transverse isotropic full waveform inversion? part 1: Sensitivity and trade-off analysis. Geophysics, 78(2), R81–R105.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Plessix, R.É. and Cao, Q.
    [2011] A parametrization study for surface seismic full waveform inversion in an acoustic vertical transversely isotropic medium. Geophys. J. Int., 185(1), 539–556.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sieminski, A., Trampert, J. and Tromp, J.
    [2009] Principal component analysis of anisotropic finite-frequency sensitivity kernels. Geophys. J. Int., 179(2), 1186–1198.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Woodward, M.J.
    [1992] Wave-equation tomography. Geophysics, 57(1), 15–26.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error