1887

Abstract

Summary

Features with a lateral extent much shorter than the recording cable length, because the recorded seismograms to exhibit highly irregular moveout behaviour in preSDM CRP gathers during the initial phases of velocity model update. If these features are only a few hundred metres wide, then it is unlikely that conventional ray-based tomography will be able to invert for them. In addition, if the autopicker being used to supply residual moveout behaviour to the tomographic inversion scheme is using a parametric picker, then the complex moveout behaviour will not be adequately described, and the tomographic inversion may not converge.

Here we show one such example of this problem, for a structure offshore Netherlands, and describe a piecemeal solution using the measured autopicking error distribution to guide a local vertical velocity update. This approach helps to resolve the shallow velocity anomaly, permitting conventional tomographic update for the deeper section to proceed successfully.

Further, this approach will be contrasted with that of a non-parametric (generalised moveout) picking approach wherein the assumption of 2nd or 4th order parametric moveout is relaxed, so as to capture the more complex moveout behaviour in the CRP gathers so as to enable the subsequent tomographic inversion to better resolve small-scale structure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140861
2014-06-16
2020-05-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bardi, F.
    , [2009], 3D seismic analysis of the Terschelling Basin Sliding Complex. TNO reports TNO 034-UT-2009-02153/A. www.tno.nl
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brittan, J. and Yuan, J.
    [2005] Dense multi-offset reflection tomography. 75th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2534–2537.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fruehn, J.K., I. F.Jones, V.Valler, P.Sangvai, A.Biswal, & M.Mathur
    , [2008], Resolving Near Seabed Velocity Anomalies: Deep Water Offshore Eastern India: Geophysics, 73, No.5, VE235VE241..
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones, I.F.
    , [2010], An introduction to velocity model building, EAGE, ISBN 978-90-73781-84-9, 296 pages.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones, I.F
    , [2012], Tutorial: Incorporating near-surface velocity anomalies in pre-stack depth migration models. First Break, 30(3),
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones, I.F.
    [2010] An Introduction to Velocity Model Building. EAGE, Houten.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lo, T.W. and Inderwiesen, P.
    [1994] Fundamentals of Seismic Tomography. SEG, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140861
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140861
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error