1887

Abstract

Summary

In well placement optimization, simultaneously satisfying the investors and environmental agencies is difficult because enforcing environmental regulations have negative impact on economic returns. Thus, a balance between ensuring profitability and keeping to environmental regulations must be found. The NPV is often used as an indicator of economic performance while the VRR is one of the factors used as an indicator of environmental safety. Recently, a study was conducted proposing the use of a weighted combination of the NPV and VRR as an objective function in well placement optimization. This approves the importance of considering both objectives. The approach however, requires that users determine priori the weight of each objective.

In this work, we present a Pareto-based multiobjective approach for integrating the NPV and the VRR in a well placement optimization framework. This approach allows us to obtain several optimal instances of well placement, each instance optimal in a particular sense. Differential evolution was used as an optimizer and well spacing constraints were enforced. A set of Pareto-optimal well locations was obtained. A synthetic case is presented to show the usefulness of the approach and analyses of how investors can use these Pareto-optimal well locations in field development planning are presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140947
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AanonsenS.I., Eide, A.L. and Holden, L.
    [1995] Optimization Reservoir Performance Under Uncertainty with Application to Well Location. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Awotunde and Sibaweihi
    [2012] Consideration of Voidage Replacement Ratio in Well Placement Optimization. SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. D.Y.Ding
    [2008] Optimization of Well Placement Using Evolutionary Methods Europe. EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Rome, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Forouzanfar, F., Li, G. and Reynolds, A.C.
    [2010] A Two Stage Well Placement Optimization Method based on Adjoint Gradient. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo, G. and Evans, R.D.
    [1993] An Economic Model for Assessing the Feasibility of Exploiting Naturally Fractured Reservoir by Horizontal Well Technology. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hassani, H., Sarkheil, H., Foroud, T. and Karimpooli, S.
    [2011] A Proxy Modeling Approach to Optimization Horizontal Well Placement. 45th U.S. Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Seifi, A. and Kazemzadeh, M.B.
    [2008] Metamodeling and optimization of the accumulated outflow from a fractured hydrocarbon reservoir.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yeten, B., Durlofsky, L.J. and Aziz, K.
    [2002] Optimization of nonconventional well type, location and trajectory. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140947
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140947
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error