1887

Abstract

Summary

We investigate the effect of recording microseismic data with an OBS cable trenched approximately 1 m into the seabed, compared to a cable lying on the seafloor. The data is from the OCTIO’s PRM system installed at the Oseberg field in 2013, approximately 140 km off the Norwegian coast. The PRM system consists of 172 4C stations in a digital network.

Trenching of the cable lowers the RMS on the crossline stations, most evident on the stations close to the rig. The large effect observed on the crossline component is believed to be due to that the majority of the rig noise comes on the inline component on the sections along the array, and that this noise is so dominating that trenching the cable will only have a marginal effect.

Inspecting the spectra, noise is lower in the frequency band 5–30 Hz once the cable is trenched. For the lower frequencies (0.1–0.8 Hz) less noise is observed on the un-trenched cable. The enhanced noise seen in the datasets for the trenched cable in the lower frequency range is thought to be due to the stronger coupling of the stations to the seafloor after trenching, which thereby picks up more signals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141050
2014-06-16
2020-02-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Duennebier, F.K. and Sutton, G.H.
    [2007] Why bury ocean bottom seismometers? Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 8(2), doi: 10.1029/2006GC001428.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001428 [Google Scholar]
  2. Gaiser, J.E.
    [1998] Compensating OBC data for variations in geophone coupling. 68th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Norwegian Meterological Insitute
    Norwegian Meterological Insitute [2014] eklima www.eklima.no. (Last accessed January 6, 2014).
  4. Norwegian National Seismic Network [2014] www.skjelv.no. (Last accessed January 2, 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Peterson, J.
    [1993] Observations and modelling of seismic background noise. Open-File Report 93-322, U.S. Department of interior geological survey, pp. 94.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141050
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141050
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error