1887

Abstract

Summary

In 2011 Schlumberger and an independent operator jointly acquired a comprehensive dataset of hydraulic fracturing operations which stimulated the Fayetteville shale: signal and noise were tracked from reservoir to surface and then across the surface. The performance of alternative monitoring technologies such as surface and shallow borehole seismic arrays as well as a downhole seismic array are analyzed.

The noise levels on the different seismic arrays are characterized and appropriate attenuation techniques are applied. Furthermore linear and non-linear stacking methods are utilized to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The application of the Coalescense Microseismic Mapping algorithm to locate microseismic events concludes that an accurate source location requires an accurate velocity model together with consistent and aligned signal. Coherent noise, insufficient signal or noise discrimination are key factors influencing location uncertainty.

Although surface line segments benefit from larger receiver apertures, SNRs of their stacks were usually only slightly higher than from stacks of surface patches using linear stacking methods. However, source localization is more accurate using surface lines. Nevertheless, surface patches are easily deployable so provided sufficient signal is recorded and noise attenuation methods are applied prior to stacking and source scanning, they may ultimately become the preferred surface monitoring configuration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141051
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Drew, J., Leslie, D., Armstrong, P. and Michaud, G.
    (2005): “Automated microseismic event detection and location by continuous spatial mapping.” Paper 95513 presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 9–12October.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Drew, J., Peyret, O., Brook, K., Primiero, P., Raymer, D., Probert, T., Leslie, D.
    (2012). “Microseismic monitoring field test using surface, shallow grid, and downhole arrays.” Paper presented at the 82nd Annual International Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Las Vegas, Nevada, 4–9November.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Özbek, A., Probert, T., Raymer, D. and Drew, J.
    (2013). “Nonlinear Processing Methods for Detection and Location of Microseismic Events”. Paper presented at the 75th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, London, UK, 10–13June.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Schilke, S.
    (2013). “Use of surface patches for hydraulic fracture monitoring”. MSc thesis, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141051
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141051
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error