1887

Abstract

Summary

We present the application and verification of a combined geophysical approach for monitoring and quantifying the storage of CO2 in deep saline formations using numerical simulations. Supercritical CO2 is injected into a deep thin saline aquifer below a synthetic site of the North German Basin. The displacement of formation brine by CO2 yields changes in bulk density, elastic moduli and electric resistivity. This justifies the application of the seismic full waveform inversion (FWI) and electric resistivity tomography (ERT) to monitor and quantify the thin, deep gas plume. These goals are real challenges for the applied geophysical monitoring techniques. Densities and saturations are obtained from a numerical simulation of the injection process and are introduced into geophysical forward models to simulate the geophysical data acquisition. These synthetic geophysical datasets are then inverted and evaluated with respect to changes in CO2 saturation and are compared to the fully known CO2 saturation of the numerical process model.

Inversion results show that both seismic FWI as well as ERT techniques are capable to detect and map the thin CO2 phase body within the target storage formation (∼2.2 km depth) from the beginning of the injection process, if accurate baseline models are available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141124
2014-06-16
2020-06-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archie, G.E.
    [1942] The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers146, 54–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asnaashari, A., Brossier, R., Garambois, S., Audebert, F., and Virieux, J.
    , 2013, Target-oriented time-lapse imaging using FWI with prior model information, EAGE Expanded Abstracts, 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibitio, London (U.K), We P07 06.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer, S., Class, H., Ebert, M., Feeser, V., Götze, H., Holzheid, A., Kolditz, O., Rosenbaum, S., Rabbel, W., Schäfer, D. and Dahmke, A.
    [2012] Modeling, parameterization and evaluation of monitoring methods for CO2 storage in deep saline formations: the CO2-MoPa project. Environmental Earth Sciences67 (2), doi: 10.1007/s12665‑012‑1707‑y.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1707-y [Google Scholar]
  4. Hagrey, S. A. al
    [2011] CO2 Plume modeling in deep saline reservoirs by 2D ERT in boreholes. The Leading Edge30(1), 24–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [2012a] 2D model study of CO2 Plumes in Saline Reservoirs by Borehole Resistivity Tomography. International Journal of Geophysics2011, 12 p, Article ID 805059. doi:10.1155/2011/805059.
    https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/805059 [Google Scholar]
  6. [2012b] 2D optimized electrode arrays for borehole resistivity tomography and CO2 sequestration modeling. Pure & Applied Geophysics169(7), 1283–1292, doi: 10.1007/s00024‑011‑0369‑0.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0369-0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hagrey, S. A. al, Strahser, M. and Rabbel, W.
    [2013]. Seismic and Geoelectric Modelling Studies of Parameters Controlling CO2 Geostorage in Saline Reservoir, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, accepted.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Denli, H. and Huang, L.
    [2009] Double-Difference Elastic Waveform Tomography in the Time Domain. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2302–2306.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gassmann, F.
    [1951] Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Viertel. Naturforsch. Ges. Zürich, 96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hese, F.
    [2009] Geologisches 3D Modell der Region Wagrien. Unpublished report, LLUR S-H, Flintbek.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Loke, M.H., Acworth, I. and Dahlin, T.
    [2003] A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics34, 182–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Xue, Z., Kim, J., Mito, S., Kitamura, K. and Matsuoka, T.
    [2009] Detecting and monitoring CO2 with P-wave velocity and resistivity from both laboratory and field scales. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 126885, 6p.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141124
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141124
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error